The King (Pariksit) was right to punish his subject for coldly receiving him or neglecting him, but because the culprit was a sage and a brahmana, it was unprecedented: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The King was right to punish his subject for coldly receiving him or neglecting him, but because the culprit was a sage and a bra…') |
(Removed from deleted category 'Was') |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{toc right}} | {{toc right}} | ||
[[Category:Pariksit]] | [[Category:Pariksit]] | ||
[[Category:Right (Correct)]] | [[Category:Right (Correct)]] | ||
[[Category:Punishment]] | [[Category:Punishment]] | ||
[[Category:Subject]] | [[Category:Subject]] | ||
[[Category:Cold]] | [[Category:Cold]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Receiving]] | ||
[[Category:Neglect]] | [[Category:Neglect]] | ||
[[Category:Because]] | [[Category:Because]] | ||
[[Category:Culprit]] | [[Category:Culprit]] | ||
[[Category:Sages]] | [[Category:Sages]] | ||
[[Category:Intellectual Class - Brahmana]] | [[Category:Intellectual Class - Brahmana]] | ||
[[Category:Unprecedented]] | [[Category:Unprecedented]] | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 01 Chapter 18 Purports - Maharaja Pariksit Cursed by a Brahmana Boy]] | |||
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 01 Purports]] | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2> | <div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2> | ||
Revision as of 07:09, 3 March 2021
Expressions researched:
"The King was right to punish his subject for coldly receiving him or neglecting him, but because the culprit was a sage and a brahmana, it was unprecedented"
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 1
O brāhmaṇas, the King's anger and envy, directed toward the brāhmaṇa sage, were unprecedented, being that circumstances had made him hungry and thirsty.
For a king like Mahārāja Parīkṣit to become angry and envious, especially at a sage and brāhmaṇa, was undoubtedly unprecedented. The King knew well that brāhmaṇas, sages, children, women and old men are always beyond the jurisdiction of punishment. Similarly, the king, even though he commits a great mistake, is never to be considered a wrongdoer. But in this case, Mahārāja Parīkṣit became angry and envious at the sage due to his thirst and hunger, by the will of the Lord. The King was right to punish his subject for coldly receiving him or neglecting him, but because the culprit was a sage and a brāhmaṇa, it was unprecedented. As the Lord is never envious of anyone, so also the Lord's devotee is never envious of anyone. The only justification for Mahārāja Parīkṣit's behavior is that it was ordained by the Lord.