SharmisthaK (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"for a woman who has no son, who is not cared for by her husband and whose co-wives neglect her, treating her like a maidservan...") |
Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{total|1}} | {{total|1}} | ||
{{toc right}} | {{toc right}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Women]] | ||
[[Category:Who Has]] | [[Category:Who Has]] | ||
[[Category:Care]] | [[Category:Care]] | ||
Expressions researched:
"for a woman who has no son, who is not cared for by her husband and whose co-wives neglect her, treating her like a maidservant, to go to the forest is better than to remain at home"
"A person who has no mother at home and whose wife does not speak sweetly should go to the forest. For such a person, living at home and living in the forest are equal." Similarly, for a woman who has no son, who is not cared for by her husband and whose co-wives neglect her, treating her like a maidservant, to go to the forest is better than to remain at home.
A wife who has no sons is neglected at home by her husband and dishonored by her co-wives exactly like a maidservant. Certainly such a woman is condemned in every respect because of her sinful life.
As stated by Cāṇakya Paṇḍita:
"A person who has no mother at home and whose wife does not speak sweetly should go to the forest. For such a person, living at home and living in the forest are equal." Similarly, for a woman who has no son, who is not cared for by her husband and whose co-wives neglect her, treating her like a maidservant, to go to the forest is better than to remain at home.