Pariksit Maharaja's observations indicate that even five thousand years ago it was the practice of criminals to atone for their crimes but then commit the same crimes again, as if forced to do so: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Pariksit Maharaja's observations indicate that even five thousand years ago it was the practice of criminals to atone for their c…') |
m (Text replacement - "\[\[Category:(after|all|also|any|are|but|by|can|even|for|from|get|has|have|his|how|into|it is|not|now|own|such|that|them|then|there|they|this|thus|to be|upon|was|who|will|you)\]\] " to "") |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Category:observation]] | [[Category:observation]] | ||
[[Category:Indicate]] | [[Category:Indicate]] | ||
[[Category:Five Thousand Years]] | [[Category:Five Thousand Years]] | ||
[[Category:ago]] | [[Category:ago]] | ||
[[Category:practice]] | [[Category:practice]] | ||
[[Category:Criminal]] | [[Category:Criminal]] | ||
[[Category:Atonement]] | [[Category:Atonement]] | ||
[[Category:their]] | [[Category:their]] | ||
[[Category:Crime]] | [[Category:Crime]] | ||
[[Category:same]] | [[Category:same]] | ||
[[Category:crime]] | [[Category:crime]] | ||
[[Category:again]] | [[Category:again]] | ||
[[Category:force]] | [[Category:force]] | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 06 Chapter 01 Purports - The History of the Life of Ajamila]] | |||
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 06 Purports]] | |||
[[Category:to Do]] | [[Category:to Do]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 39: | Line 35: | ||
<div class="heading">Parīkṣit Mahārāja's observations indicate that even five thousand years ago it was the practice of criminals to atone for their crimes but then commit the same crimes again, as if forced to do so. Therefore, owing to his practical experience, Parīkṣit Mahārāja saw that the process of repeatedly sinning and atoning is pointless. | <div class="heading">Parīkṣit Mahārāja's observations indicate that even five thousand years ago it was the practice of criminals to atone for their crimes but then commit the same crimes again, as if forced to do so. Therefore, owing to his practical experience, Parīkṣit Mahārāja saw that the process of repeatedly sinning and atoning is pointless. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 6.1.9|SB 6.1.9, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">Mahārāja Parīkṣit said: One may know that sinful activity is injurious for him because he actually sees that a criminal is punished by the government and rebuked by people in general and because he hears from scriptures and learned scholars that one is thrown into hellish conditions in the next life for committing sinful acts. Nevertheless, in spite of such knowledge, one is forced to commit sins again and again, even after performing acts of atonement. Therefore, what is the value of such atonement?</p> | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 6.1.9|SB 6.1.9, Translation and Purport]]: | ||
</span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">Mahārāja Parīkṣit said: One may know that sinful activity is injurious for him because he actually sees that a criminal is punished by the government and rebuked by people in general and because he hears from scriptures and learned scholars that one is thrown into hellish conditions in the next life for committing sinful acts. Nevertheless, in spite of such knowledge, one is forced to commit sins again and again, even after performing acts of atonement. Therefore, what is the value of such atonement?</p> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="purport text"><p>In some religious sects a sinful man goes to a priest to confess his sinful acts and pay a fine, but then he again commits the same sins and returns to confess them again. This is the practice of a professional sinner. Parīkṣit Mahārāja's observations indicate that even five thousand years ago it was the practice of criminals to atone for their crimes but then commit the same crimes again, as if forced to do so. Therefore, owing to his practical experience, Parīkṣit Mahārāja saw that the process of repeatedly sinning and atoning is pointless. Regardless of how many times he is punished, one who is attached to sense enjoyment will commit sinful acts again and again until he is trained to refrain from enjoying his senses. The word vivaśa is used herein, indicating that even one who does not want to commit sinful acts will be forced to do so by habit. Parīkṣit Mahārāja therefore considered the process of atonement to have little value for saving one from sinful acts. In the following verse he further explains his rejection of this process.</p> | <div class="purport text"><p>In some religious sects a sinful man goes to a priest to confess his sinful acts and pay a fine, but then he again commits the same sins and returns to confess them again. This is the practice of a professional sinner. Parīkṣit Mahārāja's observations indicate that even five thousand years ago it was the practice of criminals to atone for their crimes but then commit the same crimes again, as if forced to do so. Therefore, owing to his practical experience, Parīkṣit Mahārāja saw that the process of repeatedly sinning and atoning is pointless. Regardless of how many times he is punished, one who is attached to sense enjoyment will commit sinful acts again and again until he is trained to refrain from enjoying his senses. The word vivaśa is used herein, indicating that even one who does not want to commit sinful acts will be forced to do so by habit. Parīkṣit Mahārāja therefore considered the process of atonement to have little value for saving one from sinful acts. In the following verse he further explains his rejection of this process.</p> | ||
Latest revision as of 18:45, 7 March 2021
Expressions researched:
"Pariksit Maharaja's observations indicate that even five thousand years ago it was the practice of criminals to atone for their crimes but then commit the same crimes again, as if forced to do so"
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 6
SB 6.1.9, Translation and Purport:
Mahārāja Parīkṣit said: One may know that sinful activity is injurious for him because he actually sees that a criminal is punished by the government and rebuked by people in general and because he hears from scriptures and learned scholars that one is thrown into hellish conditions in the next life for committing sinful acts. Nevertheless, in spite of such knowledge, one is forced to commit sins again and again, even after performing acts of atonement. Therefore, what is the value of such atonement?
In some religious sects a sinful man goes to a priest to confess his sinful acts and pay a fine, but then he again commits the same sins and returns to confess them again. This is the practice of a professional sinner. Parīkṣit Mahārāja's observations indicate that even five thousand years ago it was the practice of criminals to atone for their crimes but then commit the same crimes again, as if forced to do so. Therefore, owing to his practical experience, Parīkṣit Mahārāja saw that the process of repeatedly sinning and atoning is pointless. Regardless of how many times he is punished, one who is attached to sense enjoyment will commit sinful acts again and again until he is trained to refrain from enjoying his senses. The word vivaśa is used herein, indicating that even one who does not want to commit sinful acts will be forced to do so by habit. Parīkṣit Mahārāja therefore considered the process of atonement to have little value for saving one from sinful acts. In the following verse he further explains his rejection of this process.