One's maternal uncle, the brother of one's mother, is on the level of one's father. When a maternal uncle has no son, his nephew legally inherits his property. Therefore, why did Kṛṣṇa directly kill Kaṁsa, the brother of His mother? Mahārāja Parīkṣit was very much inquisitive about the facts in this regard.
One's maternal uncle, the brother of one's mother, is on the level of one's father. When a maternal uncle has no son, his nephew legally inherits his property: Difference between revisions
Alankrutha (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"One's maternal uncle, the brother of one's mother, is on the level of one's father. When a maternal uncle has no son, his neph...") |
(Removed from deleted category 'His') |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
[[Category:Legal]] | [[Category:Legal]] | ||
[[Category:Inherited]] | [[Category:Inherited]] | ||
[[Category:Property]] | [[Category:Property]] | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 10 Chapter 01 Purports - The Advent of Lord Krsna: Introduction]] | [[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 10 Chapter 01 Purports - The Advent of Lord Krsna: Introduction]] |
Latest revision as of 05:11, 3 March 2021
Expressions researched:
"One's maternal uncle, the brother of one's mother, is on the level of one's father. When a maternal uncle has no son, his nephew legally inherits his property"
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 10.1 to 10.13
One's maternal uncle, the brother of one's mother, is on the level of one's father. When a maternal uncle has no son, his nephew legally inherits his property.
Lord Kṛṣṇa lived both in Vṛndāvana and in Mathurā. What did He do there? Why did He kill Kaṁsa, His mother's brother? Such killing is not at all sanctioned in the śāstras.