Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


A sentimentalist who has no Vaisnava qualifications cannot produce transcendental writings: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"A sentimentalist who has no Vaiṣṇava qualifications cannot produce transcendental writings"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Iswara...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 18: Line 18:
[[Category:Transcendental]]
[[Category:Transcendental]]
[[Category:Writings]]
[[Category:Writings]]
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 08 Chapter 17 Purports - The Supreme Lord Agrees to Become Aditi's Son]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila Chapter 09 Purports - The Desire Tree of Devotional Service]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila Chapter 09 Purports - The Desire Tree of Devotional Service]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, 62 Chapters - All Purports]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila Purports]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - 62 Chapters, All Purports]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="section">
<div id="section">

Latest revision as of 19:17, 18 February 2021

Expressions researched:
"A sentimentalist who has no Vaiṣṇava qualifications cannot produce transcendental writings"

Sri Caitanya-caritamrta

CC Adi-lila

This is the process for writing transcendental literature. A sentimentalist who has no Vaiṣṇava qualifications cannot produce transcendental writings. There are many fools who consider kṛṣṇa-līlā to be a subject of art and who write or paint pictures about the pastimes of Lord Kṛṣṇa with the gopīs, sometimes depicting them in a manner practically obscene.

I also remember the six Gosvāmīs—Rūpa, Sanātana, Bhaṭṭa Raghunātha, Śrī Jīva, Gopāla Bhaṭṭa and Dāsa Raghunātha.

This is the process for writing transcendental literature. A sentimentalist who has no Vaiṣṇava qualifications cannot produce transcendental writings. There are many fools who consider kṛṣṇa-līlā to be a subject of art and who write or paint pictures about the pastimes of Lord Kṛṣṇa with the gopīs, sometimes depicting them in a manner practically obscene. These fools take pleasure in material sense gratification, but one who wants to make advancement in spiritual life must scrupulously avoid their literature. Unless one is a servant of Kṛṣṇa and the Vaiṣṇavas, as Kṛṣṇadāsa Kavirāja Gosvāmī presents himself to be in offering respects to Lord Caitanya, His associates and His disciples, one should not attempt to write transcendental literature.