Dhruva Maharaja should have known that honor and dishonor are both destined only by one's previous actions; therefore one should not be sorry or happy under any circumstances: Difference between revisions
Mangalavati (talk | contribs) (Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"he should have known that honor and dishonor are both destined"|"only by one's previous actions; therefore one should not be sorr…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Category:Should Have]] | [[Category:Should Have]] | ||
[[Category:Known]] | [[Category:Known]] | ||
[[Category:Honor and Dishonor]] | |||
[[Category:Honor | |||
[[Category:Both]] | [[Category:Both]] | ||
[[Category:Destined]] | [[Category:Destined]] | ||
| Line 24: | Line 21: | ||
[[Category:action]] | [[Category:action]] | ||
[[Category:Therefore]] | [[Category:Therefore]] | ||
[[Category:Should Not Be | [[Category:Should Not Be Sorry]] | ||
[[Category:Happy]] | [[Category:Happy]] | ||
[[Category:Under | [[Category:Under No Circumstances]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2> | <div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 29: | ||
<div id="SB_Canto_4" class="sub_section" sec_index="4" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="SB Canto 4"><h3>SB Canto 4</h3> | <div id="SB_Canto_4" class="sub_section" sec_index="4" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="SB Canto 4"><h3>SB Canto 4</h3> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id=" | <div id="SB4828_0" class="quote" parent="SB_Canto_4" book="SB" index="316" link="SB 4.8.28" link_text="SB 4.8.28"> | ||
<div class="heading">And if Dhruva Mahārāja were so developed as to understand honor and insult, then this understanding should have been applied in his own life; he should have known that honor and dishonor are both destined only by one's previous actions; therefore one should not be sorry or happy under any circumstances. | <div class="heading">And if Dhruva Mahārāja were so developed as to understand honor and insult, then this understanding should have been applied in his own life; he should have known that honor and dishonor are both destined only by one's previous actions; therefore one should not be sorry or happy under any circumstances. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 4.8.28|SB 4.8.28, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div class="trans text">My dear Dhruva, if you feel that your sense of honor has been insulted, you still have no cause for dissatisfaction. This kind of dissatisfaction is another feature of the illusory energy; every living entity is controlled by his previous actions, and therefore there are different varieties of life for enjoying or suffering. | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 4.8.28|SB 4.8.28, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">My dear Dhruva, if you feel that your sense of honor has been insulted, you still have no cause for dissatisfaction. This kind of dissatisfaction is another feature of the illusory energy; every living entity is controlled by his previous actions, and therefore there are different varieties of life for enjoying or suffering.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="purport text">In the Vedas it is said that the living entity is always uncontaminated and unaffected by material association. The living entity gets different types of material bodies because of his previous fruitive actions. If, however, one understands the philosophy that as a living spirit soul he has an affinity for neither suffering nor enjoyment, then he is considered to be a liberated person. It is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (18.54), brahma-bhūtaḥ prasannātmā: when one is actually situated on the transcendental platform, he has nothing for which to lament and nothing for which to hanker. Nārada Ṛṣi first of all wanted to impress upon Dhruva Mahārāja that he was only a child; he should not have been affected by words of insult or honor. And if he were so developed as to understand honor and insult, then this understanding should have been applied in his own life; he should have known that honor and dishonor are both destined only by one's previous actions; therefore one should not be sorry or happy under any circumstances. | <div class="purport text"><p>In the Vedas it is said that the living entity is always uncontaminated and unaffected by material association. The living entity gets different types of material bodies because of his previous fruitive actions. If, however, one understands the philosophy that as a living spirit soul he has an affinity for neither suffering nor enjoyment, then he is considered to be a liberated person. It is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (18.54), brahma-bhūtaḥ prasannātmā: when one is actually situated on the transcendental platform, he has nothing for which to lament and nothing for which to hanker. Nārada Ṛṣi first of all wanted to impress upon Dhruva Mahārāja that he was only a child; he should not have been affected by words of insult or honor. And if he were so developed as to understand honor and insult, then this understanding should have been applied in his own life; he should have known that honor and dishonor are both destined only by one's previous actions; therefore one should not be sorry or happy under any circumstances.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 02:13, 29 June 2022
Expressions researched:
"he should have known that honor and dishonor are both destined"
|"only by one's previous actions; therefore one should not be sorry or happy under any circumstances"
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 4
My dear Dhruva, if you feel that your sense of honor has been insulted, you still have no cause for dissatisfaction. This kind of dissatisfaction is another feature of the illusory energy; every living entity is controlled by his previous actions, and therefore there are different varieties of life for enjoying or suffering.
In the Vedas it is said that the living entity is always uncontaminated and unaffected by material association. The living entity gets different types of material bodies because of his previous fruitive actions. If, however, one understands the philosophy that as a living spirit soul he has an affinity for neither suffering nor enjoyment, then he is considered to be a liberated person. It is confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (18.54), brahma-bhūtaḥ prasannātmā: when one is actually situated on the transcendental platform, he has nothing for which to lament and nothing for which to hanker. Nārada Ṛṣi first of all wanted to impress upon Dhruva Mahārāja that he was only a child; he should not have been affected by words of insult or honor. And if he were so developed as to understand honor and insult, then this understanding should have been applied in his own life; he should have known that honor and dishonor are both destined only by one's previous actions; therefore one should not be sorry or happy under any circumstances.