Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Although in human society such activities (rape and theft) are considered abominable, the demigod Indra was not considered to be degraded by them: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Although in human society such activities are considered abominable, the demigod Indra was not considered to be degraded by th...")
 
(Removed from deleted category 'Such')
 
Line 12: Line 12:
[[Category:Although]]
[[Category:Although]]
[[Category:Human Society]]
[[Category:Human Society]]
[[Category:Such]]
[[Category:Activities]]
[[Category:Activities]]
[[Category:Rape]]
[[Category:Rape]]
Line 23: Line 22:
[[Category:Considered To Be...]]
[[Category:Considered To Be...]]
[[Category:Degradation]]
[[Category:Degradation]]
[[Category:Them]]
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 04 Chapter 24 Purports - Chanting the Song Sung by Lord Siva]]
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 04 Chapter 24 Purports - Chanting the Song Sung by Lord Siva]]
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 04 Purports]]
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 04 Purports]]
Line 50: Line 48:


<div class="quote_verse">
<div class="quote_verse">
:api cet su-durācāro</dd><dd>bhajate mām ananya-bhāk</dd><dd>sādhur eva sa mantavyaḥ</dd><dd>samyag vyavasito hi saḥ
:api cet su-durācāro
:bhajate mām ananya-bhāk
:sādhur eva sa mantavyaḥ
:samyag vyavasito hi saḥ
</div>
</div>



Latest revision as of 11:54, 2 March 2021

Expressions researched:
"Although in human society such activities are considered abominable, the demigod Indra was not considered to be degraded by them"

Srimad-Bhagavatam

SB Canto 4

It is understood from various scriptures and purāṇas that the King of heaven, Indra, was very expert in stealing and kidnapping. He could steal anything without being visible to the proprietor, and he could kidnap anyone's wife without being detected. Once he raped the wife of Gautama Muni by using his disappearing art, and similarly by becoming invisible he stole the horse of Mahārāja Pṛthu. Although in human society such activities are considered abominable, the demigod Indra was not considered to be degraded by them.

Mahārāja Antardhāna had another wife, named Nabhasvatī, and by her he was happy to beget another son, named Havirdhāna. Since Mahārāja Antardhāna was very liberal, he did not kill Indra while the demigod was stealing his father's horse at the sacrifice.

It is understood from various scriptures and purāṇas that the King of heaven, Indra, was very expert in stealing and kidnapping. He could steal anything without being visible to the proprietor, and he could kidnap anyone's wife without being detected. Once he raped the wife of Gautama Muni by using his disappearing art, and similarly by becoming invisible he stole the horse of Mahārāja Pṛthu. Although in human society such activities are considered abominable, the demigod Indra was not considered to be degraded by them. Although Antardhāna could understand that King Indra was stealing the horse from his father, he did not kill Indra, for he knew that if one who is very powerful sometimes commits an abominable act, it should be disregarded. In Bhagavad-gītā (BG 9.30) it is clearly stated:

api cet su-durācāro
bhajate mām ananya-bhāk
sādhur eva sa mantavyaḥ
samyag vyavasito hi saḥ

Thus the Lord says that even if a devotee commits an abominable act, he should be considered a sādhu, or a pious man, because of his unflinching devotion to the Lord. The devotees of the Lord never willingly commit any sinful act, but sometimes they commit something abominable due to their previous habits. Such acts should not be taken very seriously, however, because the devotees of the Lord are very powerful, whether they are on the heavenly planets or on this planet. If by chance they commit something abominable, it should not be taken into account, but should be overlooked.