|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <div id="compilation"> | | <div id="compilation"> |
| <div id="facts"> | | <div id="facts"> |
| {{terms|"Baladeva Vidyabhusana, with the order of Govindaji at Jaipur, he wrote the commentary on Brahma-sutra. That name is Govinda-bhasya. So the Gaudiya-Brahma Sampradaya, they have got also commentary on Brahma-sutra"}} | | {{terms|"Baladeva Vidyābhūṣana, with the order of Govindajī at Jaipur, he wrote the commentary on ''Brahma-sūtra''. That name is ''Govinda-bhāṣya''. So the Gauḍīya-Brahmā ''sampradāya'', they have got also commentary on ''Brahma-sūtra''"}} |
| {{notes|}} | | {{notes|}} |
| {{compiler|LindaB}} | | {{compiler|LindaB}} |
Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| {{first|06Aug13}} | | {{first|06Aug13}} |
| {{last|06Aug13}} | | {{last|06Aug13}} |
| {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}} | | {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} |
| {{total|0}} | | {{total|1}} |
| {{toc right}} | | {{toc right}} |
| [[Category:Baladeva Vidyabhusana]] | | [[Category:Baladeva Vidyabhusana]] |
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
| [[Category:Write]] | | [[Category:Write]] |
| [[Category:Commentaries]] | | [[Category:Commentaries]] |
| [[Category:Brahma-sutra - redirect to - Vedanta-sutra]] | | [[Category:Vedanta-sutra]] |
| [[Category:That]]
| |
| [[Category:Name]] | | [[Category:Name]] |
| [[Category:Govinda-bhasya]] | | [[Category:Govinda-bhasya]] |
| [[Category:Gaudiya]] | | [[Category:Madhva-Gaudiya-sampradaya]] |
| [[Category:Brahma-sampradaya]] | | [[Category:Brahma-sampradaya]] |
| [[Category:They Have]] | | [[Category:They Have]] |
| [[Category:Also]] | | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1966 - 1977]] |
| </div></div> | | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1973]] |
| | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, Bhagavad-gita As It Is]] |
| | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - in India, Bombay]] |
| | </div> |
| | <div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2> |
| | </div> |
| | <div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="0" parent="Lectures" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures"><h3>Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures</h3> |
| | </div> |
| | <div id="LectureonBG13812BombaySeptember301973_0" class="quote" parent="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is_Lectures" book="Lec" index="357" link="Lecture on BG 13.8-12 -- Bombay, September 30, 1973" link_text="Lecture on BG 13.8-12 -- Bombay, September 30, 1973"> |
| | <div class="heading">Baladeva Vidyābhūṣana, with the order of Govindaji at Jaipur, he wrote the commentary on Brahma-sūtra. That name is Govinda-bhāṣya. So the Gauḍīya-Brahmā Sampradāya, they have got also commentary on Brahma-sūtra. That is required. |
| | So Kṛṣṇa has explicitly explained that brahma-sūtra-padaiś caiva hetumadbhir. Hetumadbhir viniścitaṁ. The Brahma-sūtra is called therefore nyāya-prasthāna, with logic and reason, hetumadbhir, cause and effect, Everything. |
| | </div> |
| | |
| | |
| | <mp3player>https://vanipedia.s3.amazonaws.com/clip/730930BG-BOMBAY_clip4.mp3</mp3player> |
| | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on BG 13.8-12 -- Bombay, September 30, 1973|Lecture on BG 13.8-12 -- Bombay, September 30, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;"> |
| | You can expand the . . . explain very elaborately. That is another thing. But you cannot go beyond the ''sutra''. |
| | |
| | Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu therefore says, ''māyāvādī bhāṣya sunile haya sarva nāśa'' ([[vanisource:CC Madhya 6.169|CC Madhya 6.169]]). ''Māyāvādī bhāṣya'' means Śaṅkara, ''Śārīraka-bhāṣya'' of the ''Brahma-sūtra.'' If you hear the ''Śārīraka-bhāṣya'', then you'll be doomed; it will be godless. Therefore it has been forbidden by Caitanya Mahāprabhu. All the Vaiṣṇava ''sampradāyas'', Rāmanujya ''sampradāya'', Madhvācārya ''sampradāya'', they all, I mean to say, disagree with the commentary of Śaṅkarācārya, ''Śārīraka-bhāṣya, Brahma-sūtra''. |
| | |
| | So far we are concerned, Madhva-Gauḍīya ''sampradāya'', our ''ācāryas'', they took it, ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'', as the right commentary on ''Brahma-sūtra. Bhāṣyaṁ brahma-sūtrānāṁ vedārtha-paribṛṁhitam.'' This ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' is the real ''bhāṣya'' of ''Brahma-sūtra''. So the Gauḍīya ''sampradāya'' did not make any commentary on the ''Brahma-sūtra'' because they took it, Caitanya Mahāprabhu took it, as ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'', as a natural commentary, because ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' is also made by Vyāsadeva, and Vyāsadeva is the original author of ''Brahma-sūtra.'' So author made his own commentary, so there was no need of another commentary. This is the ''Gauḍīya-siddhānta, Gauḍīya-vaiṣṇava-siddhānta.'' |
| | |
| | But sometimes back, in Jaipur, there was a challenge that, "The Gauḍīya ''sampradāya'' has no commentary on the ''Vedānta-sūtra''." So at that time Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura was requested . . . because he was grand scholar, grand old man scholar, at that time living at Vṛndāvana. So he was very old at that time; so he authorized Baladeva Vidyābhūṣana that, "You do it." There was no need, but people are demanding, "Where is your commentary on the ''Vedānta-sūtra''?" So Baladeva Vidyābhūṣana, with the order of Govindajī at Jaipur, he wrote the commentary on ''Brahma-sūtra''. That name is ''Govinda-bhāṣya''. So the Gauḍīya-Brahmā ''sampradāya'', they have got also commentary on ''Brahma-sūtra''. That is required. |
| | |
| | So Kṛṣṇa has explicitly explained that ''brahma-sūtra-padaiś caiva hetumadbhir. Hetumadbhir viniścitaṁ.'' The ''Brahma-sūtra'' is called therefore ''nyāya-prasthāna'', with logic and reason; ''hetumadbhir'', cause and effect, everything. Because people like to understand on the basis of philosophy and reasoning everything. Yes. That is required. |