Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Why Lord says? In the Vedic scripture also we'll find, parasya saktir vividhaiva sruyate: (Svetasvatara Upanisad 6.8) "There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme." Svabhaviki jnana-bala-kriya ca: Difference between revisions

m (Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|""There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme.""}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Sahadeva}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2014-08-23T14:…')
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id="compilation">
<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|""There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme.""}}
{{terms|"why Lord says? In the Vedic scripture also we'll find, ''parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate'' (''Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad'' 6.8); "There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme." ''Svābhāvikī jñāna-bala-kriyā ca''"}}
{{notes|}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Sahadeva}}
{{compiler|Sahadeva}}
Line 11: Line 11:
{{toc right}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Why]]
[[Category:Why]]
[[Category:The Lord]]
[[Category:God Says]]
[[Category:God Says]]
[[Category:Vedic Scriptures]]
[[Category:Find]]
[[Category:There Are]]
[[Category:Different Kinds Of...]]
[[Category:Different Natures of God]]
[[Category:God Is The Supreme]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1966 - 1977]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1966]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, Bhagavad-gita As It Is]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - in USA, New York]]
</div>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="section">
Line 24: Line 33:
Why Lord says? In the Vedic scripture also we'll find, parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate: (CC Madhya 13.65, purport) "There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme." Svābhāvikī jñāna-bala-kriyā ca.
Why Lord says? In the Vedic scripture also we'll find, parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate: (CC Madhya 13.65, purport) "There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme." Svābhāvikī jñāna-bala-kriyā ca.
</div>
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:660718 - Lecture BG 04.03-6 - New York|660718 - Lecture BG 04.03-6 - New York]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text">
Now, if you inquire where is now sunset or sunrise you can understand in different countries somewhere, the sun is now rising. Now, in America, the sunset and in India it is rising. It is rising. Exactly it is now eight, quarter past eight, and if you know by radio message what is the time in India you'll find that it is quarter past eight in the morning, and the sun has just rising. Now, here the sunset, and the sun... Similarly, if you inquire from Japan or any other country, the sun, the sun is somewhere in the meridian, sometimes it is, I mean to say, dead of night. So this timing difference is just like going on according to the position of the world movement. Similarly, Kṛṣṇa's appearance and disappearance is like that. It is not that Kṛṣṇa is born and Kṛṣṇa is gone. No, it is not like that. Somewhere is Kṛṣṇa there. Just like the sun is somewhere. There are innumerable universes. The one universe, you see, oh, this is only one, but there are many. You'll find in the Bhagavad-gītā that ekāṁśena sthito jagat ([[Vanisource:BG 10.42|BG 10.42|BG 10.42]]). Ekāṁśena sthito jagat. This material manifestation, with innumerable universes, is only a one part of manifestation of the Supreme Lord. Ekāṁśena sthito jagat. These descriptions are there in the Bhagavad-gītā.


So we should always remember that we are reading Bhagavad-gītā and we should understand it as it is. We should not make any interpretation. That is a wrong thing. And if there was some necessity of interpretation, we should not think that Kṛṣṇa left the matter for being interpreted by in later age by some scholar. Oh, He could have disclosed it Himself. He was quite competent. No. There is no question of interpretation. We have to understand Bhagavad-gītā as it is. If we cannot understand, that is a defect in me, not in the Bhagavad-gītā. So we have to find out the defect in me. So Lord Kṛṣṇa says, ajo 'pi sann avyayātmā bhūtānām īśvaro 'pi san: "Although I am the Lord, I am the Supreme Lord of everything and although I am unborn, aja, and avyayātmā, I have no change, still, prakṛtiṁ svām adhiṣṭhāya." Prakṛtiṁ svām.


Now, you should know there are two kinds of prakṛti. Prakṛti means nature. You'll find it in the Seventh Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā that the Lord says that He has got two... Why Lord says? In the Vedic scripture also we'll find, parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate: ([[Vanisource:CC Madhya 13.65|CC Madhya 13.65|CC Madhya 13.65, purport]]) "There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme." Svābhāvikī jñāna-bala-kriyā ca. So out of many kinds of nature of the Supreme Lord, they have divided the whole thing into three divisions. One is called external nature, and the other is called internal nature. And there is another nature which is called marginal nature. The external nature, the material world, manifestation of this material world, is external nature. And this is described in the Bhagavad-gītā, as we'll find it in the Seventh Chapter, that apareyam. Aparā. Aparā means inferior or lower nature, lower nature. So He has got higher nature.
<mp3player>https://vanipedia.s3.amazonaws.com/clip/660713BG-NEW_YORK_clip3.mp3</mp3player>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:660713_-_Lecture_BG_04.03-6_-_New_York|660713 - Lecture BG 04.03-6 - New York]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text">
So we should always remember that we are reading ''Bhagavad-gītā'' and we should understand it as it is. We should not make any interpretation. That is the wrong thing. And if there was some necessity of interpretation, we . . . you should not think that Kṛṣṇa left the matter for being interpreted by in later age by some scholar. Or He could have disclose this Himself. He was quite competent. No. There is no question of interpretation. We have to understand ''Bhagavad-gītā'' as it is. If we cannot understand, that is a defect in me, not in the ''Bhagavad-gītā''. So we have to find out the defect in me.


One may question that "Why? The Supreme Lord is all-good. Why He has got higher nature and lower nature?" Yes, He has got because He says. You cannot say that there is no higher nature and lower nature. There is also higher nature. Now, here the Lord says that "When I come as incarnation, when I appear..." Prakṛtiṁ svām adhiṣṭhāya. Svām means His higher nature. He does not accept this material nature. He does not accept this material nature.
So Lord Kṛṣṇa says, ''ajo 'pi sann avyayātmā bhūtānām īśvaro 'pi san'': "Although I am the Lord, I am the Supreme Lord of everything, and although I am unborn, ''aja'', and ''avyayātmā'', I have no change, still, ''prakṛtiṁ svām adhiṣṭhāya''." ''Prakṛtiṁ svām''.


Just like the example... We can give very tangible example. Just like in the prison house sometimes the head of the country goes to visit, to see, to inspect how the prison life is going on or to give them some instruction, some good lesson, that "Why you are rotting in prison? You become good citizen." Now, suppose the head of the state goes to the prison and to instruct the prisoners, and if the prisoners think, "Oh, he is also a prisoner. The head of the state who has come to instruct, he is also one of the prisoners, like us."
Now, you should know there are two kinds of ''prakṛti''. ''Prakṛti'' means nature. You'll find it in the Seventh Chapter of ''Bhagavad-gītā'' that the Lord says that He has got two . . . why Lord says? In the Vedic scripture also we'll find, ''parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate'' (''Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad'' 6.8); "There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme." ''Svābhāvikī jñāna-bala-kriyā ca''. So out of many kinds of nature of the Supreme Lord, they have divided the whole thing into three division. One is called external nature and the other is called internal nature. And there is another nature, which is called marginal nature. The external nature, the material world, manifestation of this material world, is external nature. And this is described in the ''Bhagavad-gītā'', as we'll find it in the Seventh Chapter, that ''apareyam''. ''Aparā''. ''Aparā'' means inferior or lower nature. Lower nature. So He has got higher nature.
 
So similarly, if we think that Kṛṣṇa is like us, He is also assumed a material body and He is one of us, then it is a mistake. It is a mistake. That is explained. In the later chapters you'll find. Avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam: ([[Vanisource:BG 9.11|BG 9.11|BG 9.11]]) "Oh, because I appear just like a man, the foolish man considers Me as one of them. But I am not as one of... I am not one of them." Here it is clearly said that "I appear, I appear." Prakṛtiṁ svām adhiṣṭhāya. "I appear in My own spiritual nature. I don't accept this lower nature, this material nature." So we are, when we appear... Just like we have appeared. We have appeared in this material world, accepting this material body, the lower nature. But when Kṛṣṇa comes, He does not accept the lower nature. He comes in His original, superior, or higher, nature. That is the difference between Kṛṣṇa and ourselves. Here it is clearly said, prakṛtiṁ svām. Svām means own, personal, internal nature.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 05:12, 23 August 2021

Expressions researched:
"why Lord says? In the Vedic scripture also we'll find, parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate (Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 6.8); "There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme." Svābhāvikī jñāna-bala-kriyā ca"

Lectures

Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures

Why Lord says? In the Vedic scripture also we'll find, parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate: (CC Madhya 13.65, purport) "There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme." Svābhāvikī jñāna-bala-kriyā ca.


660713 - Lecture BG 04.03-6 - New York:

So we should always remember that we are reading Bhagavad-gītā and we should understand it as it is. We should not make any interpretation. That is the wrong thing. And if there was some necessity of interpretation, we . . . you should not think that Kṛṣṇa left the matter for being interpreted by in later age by some scholar. Or He could have disclose this Himself. He was quite competent. No. There is no question of interpretation. We have to understand Bhagavad-gītā as it is. If we cannot understand, that is a defect in me, not in the Bhagavad-gītā. So we have to find out the defect in me.

So Lord Kṛṣṇa says, ajo 'pi sann avyayātmā bhūtānām īśvaro 'pi san: "Although I am the Lord, I am the Supreme Lord of everything, and although I am unborn, aja, and avyayātmā, I have no change, still, prakṛtiṁ svām adhiṣṭhāya." Prakṛtiṁ svām.

Now, you should know there are two kinds of prakṛti. Prakṛti means nature. You'll find it in the Seventh Chapter of Bhagavad-gītā that the Lord says that He has got two . . . why Lord says? In the Vedic scripture also we'll find, parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate (Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 6.8); "There are different kinds of nature of the Supreme." Svābhāvikī jñāna-bala-kriyā ca. So out of many kinds of nature of the Supreme Lord, they have divided the whole thing into three division. One is called external nature and the other is called internal nature. And there is another nature, which is called marginal nature. The external nature, the material world, manifestation of this material world, is external nature. And this is described in the Bhagavad-gītā, as we'll find it in the Seventh Chapter, that apareyam. Aparā. Aparā means inferior or lower nature. Lower nature. So He has got higher nature.