Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


The Mayavadi philosopher tries to establish that the living entity is only imaginary and that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is under the influence of maya. Hearing this kind of commentary breaks the heart and life of a devotee: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Māyāvādī philosopher tries to establish that the living entity is only imaginary and that the Supreme Personality of G...")
 
m (Moved from category 'Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila Chapter 02 - The Chastisement of Junior Haridasa' to category 'Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila 20 Chapters')
 
Line 20: Line 20:
[[Category:Influence of Maya]]
[[Category:Influence of Maya]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila Chapter 02 - The Chastisement of Junior Haridasa]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila Chapter 02 - The Chastisement of Junior Haridasa]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - 62 Chapters]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila 20 Chapters]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="section">
<div id="section">

Latest revision as of 15:42, 15 August 2020

Expressions researched:
"The Māyāvādī philosopher tries to establish that the living entity is only imaginary and that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is under the influence of māyā. Hearing this kind of commentary breaks the heart and life of a devotee"

Sri Caitanya-caritamrta

CC Antya-lila

“The Māyāvādī philosopher tries to establish that the living entity is only imaginary and that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is under the influence of māyā. Hearing this kind of commentary breaks the heart and life of a devotee.”.

The Māyāvādī philosopher tries to establish that the living entity is only imaginary and that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is under the influence of māyā. Hearing this kind of commentary breaks the heart and life of a devotee.

Śrīla Svarūpa Dāmodara Gosvāmī wanted to impress upon Bhagavān Ācārya that even though someone firmly fixed in devotion to Kṛṣṇa’s service might not be deviated by hearing the Māyāvāda bhāṣya, that bhāṣya is nevertheless full of impersonal words and ideas—such as Brahman—which represent knowledge but which are impersonal. The Māyāvādīs say that the world created by māyā is false and that actually there is no living entity but only one spiritual effulgence. They further say that God is imaginary, that people think of God only because of ignorance, and that when the Supreme Absolute Truth is befooled by the external energy, māyā, He becomes a jīva, or living entity. Upon hearing all these nonsensical ideas from the nondevotee, a devotee is greatly afflicted, as if his heart and soul were broken.