Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Here the Queen (the wife of King Citraketu) blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son: Difference between revisions

(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his…')
 
(Removed from deleted category 'His')
 
Line 17: Line 17:
[[Category:Supreme]]
[[Category:Supreme]]
[[Category:Providence]]
[[Category:Providence]]
[[Category:For]]
[[Category:Son]]
[[Category:Son]]
[[Category:Death]]
[[Category:Death]]
Line 27: Line 26:
[[Category:Die]]
[[Category:Die]]
[[Category:First]]
[[Category:First]]
[[Category:Then]]
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 06 Chapter 14 Purports - King Citraketu's Lamentation]]
[[Category:His]]
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 06 Purports]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>
Line 37: Line 36:
<div class="heading">This is the way a conditioned soul condemns the supreme creator when he meets reverses. Sometimes he accuses the Supreme Personality of Godhead of being crooked because some people are happy and some are not. Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son.
<div class="heading">This is the way a conditioned soul condemns the supreme creator when he meets reverses. Sometimes he accuses the Supreme Personality of Godhead of being crooked because some people are happy and some are not. Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son.
</div>
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 6.14.54|SB 6.14.54, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">Alas, O Providence, O Creator, You are certainly inexperienced in creation, for during the lifetime of a father You have caused the death of his son, thus acting in opposition to Your creative laws. If You are determined to contradict these laws, You are certainly the enemy of living entities and are never merciful.</p>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 6.14.54|SB 6.14.54, Translation and Purport]]:  
</span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">Alas, O Providence, O Creator, You are certainly inexperienced in creation, for during the lifetime of a father You have caused the death of his son, thus acting in opposition to Your creative laws. If You are determined to contradict these laws, You are certainly the enemy of living entities and are never merciful.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="purport text"><p>This is the way a conditioned soul condemns the supreme creator when he meets reverses. Sometimes he accuses the Supreme Personality of Godhead of being crooked because some people are happy and some are not. Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son. If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being. Actually it is not the creator, but the conditioned soul who is inexperienced. He does not know how the subtle laws of fruitive activity work, and without knowledge of these laws of nature, he ignorantly criticizes the Supreme Personality of Godhead.</p>
<div class="purport text"><p>This is the way a conditioned soul condemns the supreme creator when he meets reverses. Sometimes he accuses the Supreme Personality of Godhead of being crooked because some people are happy and some are not. Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son. If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being. Actually it is not the creator, but the conditioned soul who is inexperienced. He does not know how the subtle laws of fruitive activity work, and without knowledge of these laws of nature, he ignorantly criticizes the Supreme Personality of Godhead.</p>

Latest revision as of 15:56, 2 March 2021

Expressions researched:
"Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son"

Srimad-Bhagavatam

SB Canto 6

This is the way a conditioned soul condemns the supreme creator when he meets reverses. Sometimes he accuses the Supreme Personality of Godhead of being crooked because some people are happy and some are not. Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son.

SB 6.14.54, Translation and Purport:

Alas, O Providence, O Creator, You are certainly inexperienced in creation, for during the lifetime of a father You have caused the death of his son, thus acting in opposition to Your creative laws. If You are determined to contradict these laws, You are certainly the enemy of living entities and are never merciful.

This is the way a conditioned soul condemns the supreme creator when he meets reverses. Sometimes he accuses the Supreme Personality of Godhead of being crooked because some people are happy and some are not. Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son. If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being. Actually it is not the creator, but the conditioned soul who is inexperienced. He does not know how the subtle laws of fruitive activity work, and without knowledge of these laws of nature, he ignorantly criticizes the Supreme Personality of Godhead.