Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Being a great son of a great father, he (Vyasadeva) should not have identified the self with the body or the mind. Ordinary men with a poor fund of knowledge can identify the body as self or the mind as self, but Vyasadeva should not have done so: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Being a great son of a great father, he should not have identified the self with the body or the mind. Ordinary men with a poo...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 13: Line 13:
[[Category:Great]]
[[Category:Great]]
[[Category:Son]]
[[Category:Son]]
[[Category:Father]]
[[Category:Parasara is the Father of Vyasadeva]]
[[Category:Vyasadeva]]
[[Category:Should Not]]
[[Category:Should Not]]
[[Category:Not Have]]
[[Category:Not Have]]
Line 20: Line 19:
[[Category:Self]]
[[Category:Self]]
[[Category:Body and Mind]]
[[Category:Body and Mind]]
[[Category:Ordinary Man]]
[[Category:Ordinary Men]]
[[Category:Poor Fund of Knowledge]]
[[Category:Men With a Poor Fund of Knowledge]]
[[Category:Can]]
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 01 Chapter 05 Purports - Narada's Instructions on Srimad-Bhagavatam for Vyasadeva]]
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 01 Chapter 05 Purports - Narada's Instructions on Srimad-Bhagavatam for Vyasadeva]]
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 01 Purports]]
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 01 Purports]]

Latest revision as of 09:41, 2 July 2023

Expressions researched:
"Being a great son of a great father, he should not have identified the self with the body or the mind. Ordinary men with a poor fund of knowledge can identify the body as self or the mind as self, but Vyāsadeva should not have done so"

Srimad-Bhagavatam

SB Canto 1

Being a great son of a great father, he should not have identified the self with the body or the mind. Ordinary men with a poor fund of knowledge can identify the body as self or the mind as self, but Vyāsadeva should not have done so.

Addressing Vyāsadeva, the son of Parāśara, Nārada inquired: Are you satisfied by identifying with the body or the mind as objects of self-realization?

This was a hint by Nārada to Vyāsadeva regarding the cause of his despondency. Vyāsadeva, as the descendant of Parāśara, a greatly powerful sage, had the privilege of having a great parentage which should not have given Vyāsadeva cause for despondency. Being a great son of a great father, he should not have identified the self with the body or the mind. Ordinary men with a poor fund of knowledge can identify the body as self or the mind as self, but Vyāsadeva should not have done so. One cannot be cheerful by nature unless one is factually seated in self-realization, which is transcendental to the material body and mind.