Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Asvatthama was a bona fide son of Dronacarya and Krpi, but because he had degraded himself to a lower status of life, it was proper to treat him as an animal and not as a brahmana: Difference between revisions

(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Asvatthama was a bona fide son of Dronacarya and Krpi"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Sahadeva}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|22Oct10}} {{la…')
 
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
{{terms|"Asvatthama was a bona fide son of Dronacarya and Krpi"}}
{{terms|"Asvatthama was a bona fide son of Dronacarya and Krpi"}}
{{notes|}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Sahadeva}}
{{compiler|Sahadeva|Laksmipriya}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|22Oct10}}
{{first|22Oct10}}
{{last|22Oct10}}
{{last|24May12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=1|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=1|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Asvatthama]]
[[Category:Asvatthama]]
[[Category:Was]]
[[Category:Bona Fide]]
[[Category:Bona Fide]]
[[Category:Son Of...]]
[[Category:Son Of...]]
[[Category:Dronacarya]]
[[Category:Dronacarya]]
[[Category:Krpi]]
[[Category:Krpi]]
[[Category:Because]]
[[Category:Degradation]]
[[Category:Himself]]
[[Category:Lower]]
[[Category:Status]]
[[Category:Life]]
[[Category:Proper]]
[[Category:Treat]]
[[Category:Animal]]
[[Category:Not a Brahmana‎]]
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 01 Chapter 07 Purports - The Son of Drona Punished]]
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 01 Purports]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>

Latest revision as of 17:01, 24 February 2022

Expressions researched:
"Asvatthama was a bona fide son of Dronacarya and Krpi"

Srimad-Bhagavatam

SB Canto 1

Aśvatthāmā was a bona fide son of Droṇācārya and Kṛpī, but because he had degraded himself to a lower status of life, it was proper to treat him as an animal and not as a brāhma.
SB 1.7.33, Translation and Purport:

Arjuna, his eyes blazing in anger like two red balls of copper, dexterously arrested the son of Gautamī and bound him with ropes like an animal.

Aśvatthāmā's mother, Kṛpī, was born in the family of Gautama. The significant point in this śloka is that Aśvatthāmā was caught and bound up with ropes like an animal. According to Śrīdhara Svāmī, Arjuna was obliged to catch this son of a brāhmaṇa like an animal as a part of his duty (dharma). This suggestion by Śrīdhara Svāmī is also confirmed in the later statement of Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Aśvatthāmā was a bona fide son of Droṇācārya and Kṛpī, but because he had degraded himself to a lower status of life, it was proper to treat him as an animal and not as a brāhmaṇa.