If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered mercifu…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[Category:Creative]] | [[Category:Creative]] | ||
[[Category:Law]] | [[Category:Law]] | ||
[[Category:Change]] | [[Category:Change]] | ||
[[Category:According]] | [[Category:According]] | ||
[[Category:Whimsically]] | [[Category:Whimsically]] | ||
[[Category:Providence]] | [[Category:Providence]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Should Certainly]] | ||
[[Category:Certainly]] | [[Category:Certainly Not]] | ||
[[Category:Not Be]] | [[Category:Not Be]] | ||
[[Category:Consider]] | [[Category:Consider]] | ||
[[Category:Merciful]] | [[Category:Merciful]] | ||
[[Category:Must Be]] | [[Category:Must Be]] | ||
[[Category:Consider]] | [[Category:Consider]] | ||
[[Category:Inimical]] | [[Category:Inimical]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Created Beings]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 06 Chapter 14 Purports - King Citraketu's Lamentation]] | ||
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 06 Purports]] | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2> | <div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
<div class="heading">If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being. Actually it is not the creator, but the conditioned soul who is inexperienced. He does not know how the subtle laws of fruitive activity work, and without knowledge of these laws of nature, he ignorantly criticizes the Supreme Personality of Godhead. | <div class="heading">If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being. Actually it is not the creator, but the conditioned soul who is inexperienced. He does not know how the subtle laws of fruitive activity work, and without knowledge of these laws of nature, he ignorantly criticizes the Supreme Personality of Godhead. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 6.14.54|SB 6.14.54, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">Alas, O Providence, O Creator, You are certainly inexperienced in creation, for during the lifetime of a father You have caused the death of his son, thus acting in opposition to Your creative laws. If You are determined to contradict these laws, You are certainly the enemy of living entities and are never merciful.</p> | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 6.14.54|SB 6.14.54, Translation and Purport]]: | ||
</span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">Alas, O Providence, O Creator, You are certainly inexperienced in creation, for during the lifetime of a father You have caused the death of his son, thus acting in opposition to Your creative laws. If You are determined to contradict these laws, You are certainly the enemy of living entities and are never merciful.</p> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="purport text"><p>This is the way a conditioned soul condemns the supreme creator when he meets reverses. Sometimes he accuses the Supreme Personality of Godhead of being crooked because some people are happy and some are not. Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son. If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being. Actually it is not the creator, but the conditioned soul who is inexperienced. He does not know how the subtle laws of fruitive activity work, and without knowledge of these laws of nature, he ignorantly criticizes the Supreme Personality of Godhead.</p> | <div class="purport text"><p>This is the way a conditioned soul condemns the supreme creator when he meets reverses. Sometimes he accuses the Supreme Personality of Godhead of being crooked because some people are happy and some are not. Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son. If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being. Actually it is not the creator, but the conditioned soul who is inexperienced. He does not know how the subtle laws of fruitive activity work, and without knowledge of these laws of nature, he ignorantly criticizes the Supreme Personality of Godhead.</p> | ||
Latest revision as of 08:25, 7 June 2022
Expressions researched:
"If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being"
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 6
If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being. Actually it is not the creator, but the conditioned soul who is inexperienced. He does not know how the subtle laws of fruitive activity work, and without knowledge of these laws of nature, he ignorantly criticizes the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
SB 6.14.54, Translation and Purport:
Alas, O Providence, O Creator, You are certainly inexperienced in creation, for during the lifetime of a father You have caused the death of his son, thus acting in opposition to Your creative laws. If You are determined to contradict these laws, You are certainly the enemy of living entities and are never merciful.
This is the way a conditioned soul condemns the supreme creator when he meets reverses. Sometimes he accuses the Supreme Personality of Godhead of being crooked because some people are happy and some are not. Here the Queen blames supreme providence for her son's death. Following the creative laws, a father should die first and then his son. If the creative laws are changed according to the whims of providence, then providence certainly should not be considered merciful, but must be considered inimical to the created being. Actually it is not the creator, but the conditioned soul who is inexperienced. He does not know how the subtle laws of fruitive activity work, and without knowledge of these laws of nature, he ignorantly criticizes the Supreme Personality of Godhead.