Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Had Krsna been the plenary portion and Narayana the primeval Lord, the statement of Suta Gosvami would have been reversed: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 14: Line 14:
[[Category:Krsna Is Lord Narayana]]
[[Category:Krsna Is Lord Narayana]]
[[Category:Krsna Is The Primeval Lord]]
[[Category:Krsna Is The Primeval Lord]]
[[Category:Statement]]
[[Category:Statements about Krsna]]
[[Category:Suta Gosvami]]
[[Category:Suta Gosvami]]
[[Category:Would Have]]
[[Category:Would Have]]

Latest revision as of 09:53, 26 March 2025

Expressions researched:
"Had Krsna been the plenary portion and Narayana the primeval Lord, the statement of Suta Gosvami would have been reversed"

Sri Caitanya-caritamrta

CC Adi-lila

Had Krsna been the plenary portion and Narayana the primeval Lord, the statement of Suta Gosvami would have been reversed.

Had Krsna been the plenary portion and Narayana the primeval Lord, the statement of Suta Gosvami would have been reversed.