These are the characteristics of an impartial ruler. It is the duty of a ruler to punish the criminal and give protection to the innocent. King Pṛthu was so neutral that if his own son were punishable, he would not hesitate to punish him. On the other hand, if the son of his enemy were innocent, he would not engage in some intrigue in order to punish him.
King Prthu was so neutral that if his own son were punishable, he would not hesitate to punish him. On the other hand, if the son of his enemy were innocent, he would not engage in some intrigue in order to punish him: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"King Pṛthu was so neutral that if his own son were punishable, he would not hesitate to punish him. On the other hand, if th...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{total|1}} | {{total|1}} | ||
{{toc right}} | {{toc right}} | ||
[[Category:Prthu]] | [[Category:Prthu's Character]] | ||
[[Category:God Is Neutral]] | [[Category:God Is Neutral]] | ||
[[Category:That If]] | [[Category:That If]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:14, 7 June 2024
Expressions researched:
"King Pṛthu was so neutral that if his own son were punishable, he would not hesitate to punish him. On the other hand, if the son of his enemy were innocent, he would not engage in some intrigue in order to punish him"
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 4
These are the characteristics of an impartial ruler. It is the duty of a ruler to punish the criminal and give protection to the innocent. King Pṛthu was so neutral that if his own son were punishable, he would not hesitate to punish him. On the other hand, if the son of his enemy were innocent, he would not engage in some intrigue in order to punish him.
Since this King will always remain on the path of piety, he will be neutral to both his son and the son of his enemy. If the son of his enemy is not punishable, he will not punish him, but if his own son is punishable, he will immediately punish him.