It is to be understood that the Haṁsa-guhya prayers were not composed by Dakṣa, but were existing in the Vedic literature
It is to be understood that the Hamsa-guhya prayers were not composed by Daksa, but were existing in the Vedic literature: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"It is to be understood that the Haṁsa-guhya prayers were not composed by Dakṣa, but were existing in the Vedic literature"...") |
(Removed from deleted category 'That') |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{toc right}} | {{toc right}} | ||
[[Category:It Is Understood]] | [[Category:It Is Understood]] | ||
[[Category:Hamsa]] | [[Category:Hamsa]] | ||
[[Category:Prayer]] | [[Category:Prayer]] | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
[[Category:Composed]] | [[Category:Composed]] | ||
[[Category:Daksa]] | [[Category:Daksa]] | ||
[[Category:Were]] | [[Category:Were]] | ||
[[Category:Exist]] | [[Category:Exist]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:10, 2 March 2021
Expressions researched:
"It is to be understood that the Haṁsa-guhya prayers were not composed by Dakṣa, but were existing in the Vedic literature"
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 6
It is to be understood that the Haṁsa-guhya prayers were not composed by Dakṣa, but were existing in the Vedic literature.
My dear King, I shall fully explain to you the Haṁsa-guhya prayers, which were offered to the Supreme Personality of Godhead by Dakṣa, and I shall explain how the Lord was pleased with him for those prayers.