Prabhupāda: No, there is no question of separation, that if we accept God as the supreme father. Now the Christian religion believes God as the supreme father. So if the supreme father is there, and if we become obedient to the supreme father, then why, where is the difference of opinion? But we do not know the supreme father and we do not obey the supreme father. That is the cause of dissension. The son's duty is to become obedient to the father and enjoy father's property. So if we know the supreme father, and if we live according to the father's order, so there is question of antagonism, dissension. It is all our own, father being the center. That, the difficulty is that we call supreme father but we do not accept the father's order or what is the order of the supreme father. That is the defect.
If we know the supreme father, and if we live according to the father's order, so there is question of antagonism, dissension: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"if we know the supreme father, and if we live according to the father's order, so there is question of antagonism, dissension"}} …') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{terms|"if we know the supreme father, and if we live according to the father's order, so there is question of antagonism, dissension"}} | {{terms|"if we know the supreme father, and if we live according to the father's order, so there is question of antagonism, dissension"}} | ||
{{notes|}} | {{notes|}} | ||
{{compiler|Mayapur}} | {{compiler|Mayapur|Labangalatika}} | ||
{{complete|ALL}} | {{complete|ALL}} | ||
{{first|22Jun12}} | {{first|22Jun12}} | ||
{{last| | {{last|23Jun12}} | ||
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} | {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} | ||
{{total|1}} | {{total|1}} | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<div class="heading">If we know the supreme father, and if we live according to the father's order, so there is question of antagonism, dissension. It is all our own, father being the center. | <div class="heading">If we know the supreme father, and if we live according to the father's order, so there is question of antagonism, dissension. It is all our own, father being the center. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Philosophy Discussion on Karl Marx|Philosophy Discussion on Karl Marx]]: </span><div | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Philosophy Discussion on Karl Marx|Philosophy Discussion on Karl Marx]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: No, there is no question of separation, that if we accept God as the supreme father. Now the Christian religion believes God as the supreme father. So if the supreme father is there, and if we become obedient to the supreme father, then why, where is the difference of opinion? But we do not know the supreme father and we do not obey the supreme father. That is the cause of dissension. The son's duty is to become obedient to the father and enjoy father's property. So if we know the supreme father, and if we live according to the father's order, so there is question of antagonism, dissension. It is all our own, father being the center. That, the difficulty is that we call supreme father but we do not accept the father's order or what is the order of the supreme father. That is the defect.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 11:15, 23 June 2012
Expressions researched:
"if we know the supreme father, and if we live according to the father's order, so there is question of antagonism, dissension"
Lectures
Philosophy Discussions
If we know the supreme father, and if we live according to the father's order, so there is question of antagonism, dissension. It is all our own, father being the center.
Philosophy Discussion on Karl Marx: