Brahmanas and Vaisnavas should be accepted as earthly representatives of Narayana: Difference between revisions
Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tag: Undo |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{terms|Brahmanas and Vaisnavas should be accepted as earthly representatives of Narayana}} | <div id="compilation"> | ||
<div id="facts"> | |||
{{terms|"Brahmanas and Vaisnavas should be accepted as earthly representatives of Narayana"}} | |||
{{notes|}} | {{notes|}} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
{{toc right}} | {{toc right}} | ||
[[Category:Brahmanas and Devotees of God]] | |||
[[Category:Vaisnava - Devotees of God]] | |||
[[Category:Should Be]] | |||
[[Category:Accepted As...]] | |||
[[Category:Earthly]] | |||
[[Category:Devotees of God Always Represent God]] | |||
[[Category:God Is Lord Narayana]] | |||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 03 Chapter 16 Purports - The Two Doorkeepers of Vaikuntha, Jaya and Vijaya, Cursed by the Sages]] | |||
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 03 Purports]] | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="section" id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2></div> | |||
<div class="sub_section" id="SB_Canto_3" text="SB Canto 3"><h3>SB Canto 3</h3></div> | |||
<div class="quote" book="SB" link="SB 3.16.11" link_text="SB 3.16.11, Purport"> | |||
<div class="heading">Brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas should be accepted as earthly representatives of Nārāyaṇa. Nowadays some foolish persons have manufactured the term daridra-nārāyaṇa, indicating that the poor man should be accepted as the representative of Nārāyaṇa. But in Vedic literature we do not find that poor men should be treated as representatives of Nārāyaṇa.</div> | |||
<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:SB 3.16.11|SB 3.16.11, Purport]]:''' It has been observed in many instances in the Vedic scriptures that when the brāhmaṇas or Vaiṣṇavas curse someone in an angry mood, the person who is cursed does not take it upon himself to treat the brāhmaṇas or Vaiṣṇavas in the same way. There are many examples of this. For instance, the sons of Kuvera, when cursed by the great sage Nārada, did not seek revenge in the same harsh way, but submitted. Here also, when Jaya and Vijaya were cursed by the four Kumāras, they did not become harsh towards them; rather, they submitted. That should be the way of treating brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas. One may sometimes be faced with a grievous situation created by a brāhmaṇa, but instead of meeting him with a similar mood, one should try to pacify him with a smiling face and mild treatment. Brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas should be accepted as earthly representatives of Nārāyaṇa. Nowadays some foolish persons have manufactured the term daridra-nārāyaṇa, indicating that the poor man should be accepted as the representative of Nārāyaṇa. But in Vedic literature we do not find that poor men should be treated as representatives of Nārāyaṇa. Of course, "those who are unprotected" are mentioned here, but the definition of this phrase is clear from the śāstras. The poor man should not be unprotected, but the brāhmaṇa should especially be treated as the representative of Nārāyaṇa and should be worshiped like Him. It is specifically said that to pacify the brāhmaṇas, one's face should be lotuslike. A lotuslike face is exhibited when one is adorned with love and affection. In this respect, the example of the father's being angry at the son and the son's trying to pacify the father with smiling and sweet words is very appropriate.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
< | |||
Latest revision as of 13:26, 20 February 2022
Expressions researched:
"Brahmanas and Vaisnavas should be accepted as earthly representatives of Narayana"
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 3
Brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas should be accepted as earthly representatives of Nārāyaṇa. Nowadays some foolish persons have manufactured the term daridra-nārāyaṇa, indicating that the poor man should be accepted as the representative of Nārāyaṇa. But in Vedic literature we do not find that poor men should be treated as representatives of Nārāyaṇa.
SB 3.16.11, Purport: It has been observed in many instances in the Vedic scriptures that when the brāhmaṇas or Vaiṣṇavas curse someone in an angry mood, the person who is cursed does not take it upon himself to treat the brāhmaṇas or Vaiṣṇavas in the same way. There are many examples of this. For instance, the sons of Kuvera, when cursed by the great sage Nārada, did not seek revenge in the same harsh way, but submitted. Here also, when Jaya and Vijaya were cursed by the four Kumāras, they did not become harsh towards them; rather, they submitted. That should be the way of treating brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas. One may sometimes be faced with a grievous situation created by a brāhmaṇa, but instead of meeting him with a similar mood, one should try to pacify him with a smiling face and mild treatment. Brāhmaṇas and Vaiṣṇavas should be accepted as earthly representatives of Nārāyaṇa. Nowadays some foolish persons have manufactured the term daridra-nārāyaṇa, indicating that the poor man should be accepted as the representative of Nārāyaṇa. But in Vedic literature we do not find that poor men should be treated as representatives of Nārāyaṇa. Of course, "those who are unprotected" are mentioned here, but the definition of this phrase is clear from the śāstras. The poor man should not be unprotected, but the brāhmaṇa should especially be treated as the representative of Nārāyaṇa and should be worshiped like Him. It is specifically said that to pacify the brāhmaṇas, one's face should be lotuslike. A lotuslike face is exhibited when one is adorned with love and affection. In this respect, the example of the father's being angry at the son and the son's trying to pacify the father with smiling and sweet words is very appropriate.