Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


A devoted wife, who is according to revealed scripture the better half of her husband, is justified in embracing voluntary death along with her husband if she is without issue: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"A devoted wife, who is according to revealed scripture the better half of her husband, is justified in embracing voluntary dea...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 11: Line 11:
{{toc right}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Krsna's Devotees]]
[[Category:Krsna's Devotees]]
[[Category:Wife]]
[[Category:Devoted Wife]]
[[Category:Who Is]]
[[Category:Who Is]]
[[Category:According]]
[[Category:According to the Scriptures]]
[[Category:Revealed Scripture]]
[[Category:Revealed Scripture]]
[[Category:Better]]
[[Category:Wife is Better Half of Husband]]
[[Category:Half]]
[[Category:Husband]]
[[Category:Justify]]
[[Category:Justify]]
[[Category:Embrace]]
[[Category:Embrace]]

Latest revision as of 14:36, 9 August 2023

Expressions researched:
"A devoted wife, who is according to revealed scripture the better half of her husband, is justified in embracing voluntary death along with her husband if she is without issue"

Srimad-Bhagavatam

SB Canto 1

A devoted wife, who is according to revealed scripture the better half of her husband, is justified in embracing voluntary death along with her husband if she is without issue.

He [Droṇācārya] is certainly still existing, being represented by his son. His wife Kṛpī did not undergo a satī with him because she had a son.

The wife of Droṇācārya, Kṛpī, is the sister of Kṛpācārya. A devoted wife, who is according to revealed scripture the better half of her husband, is justified in embracing voluntary death along with her husband if she is without issue. But in the case of the wife of Droṇācārya, she did not undergo such a trial because she had her son, the representative of her husband. A widow is a widow only in name if there is a son of her husband existing. So in either case Aśvatthāmā was the representative of Droṇācārya, and therefore killing Aśvatthāmā would be like killing Droṇācārya. That was the argument of Draupadī against the killing of Aśvatthāmā.