Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on Bhagavad-gita because he knows what is what. BG 1972 purports: Difference between revisions

(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on Bhagavad-gita because he knows what is what"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler…')
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id="compilation">
<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on Bhagavad-gita because he knows what is what"}}
{{terms|"A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on"|"Bhagavad-gītā"|"because he knows what is what"}}
{{notes|}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Visnu Murti}}
{{compiler|Visnu Murti}}
Line 10: Line 10:
{{total|1}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Pure Devotees]]
[[Category:Pure Devotees of God]]
[[Category:Pure Devotees of God Are Not Confused by Misguiding Commentaries on Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Confusion]]
[[Category:Confusion]]
[[Category:Misguidance]]
[[Category:Misguided]]
[[Category:Commentaries]]
[[Category:Commentaries on the Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Because]]
[[Category:Because]]
[[Category:Knows]]
[[Category:Devotees of God Know What Is What]]
[[Category:What Is What]]
[[Category:Know What Is What]]
[[Category:Bhagavad-gita As It Is - 1972 Purports, Chapter 11 - Vaniquotes]]
[[Category:Bhagavad-gita As It Is - 1972 Purports, Chapters 01 to 18 - Vaniquotes]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" class="section" sec_index="0" parent="compilation" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As It Is</h2>
<div id="section">
<h2>Bhagavad-gita As it is</h2>
</div>
</div>
<div id="BG_Chapters_7_-_12" class="sub_section" sec_index="2" parent="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" text="BG Chapters 7 - 12"><h3>BG Chapters 7 - 12</h3>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>BG Chapters 7 - 12</h3>
</div>
</div>
<div id="BG1151_0" class="quote" parent="BG_Chapters_7_-_12" book="BG" index="180" link="BG 11.51" link_text="BG 11.51">
<div class="quote">
<div class="heading">A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on Bhagavad-gītā because he knows what is what. The original verses of Bhagavad-gītā are as clear as the sun; they do not require lamplight from foolish commentators.
<div class="quote_heading">
Kṛṣṇa has actually shown His universal form and His fourhanded Viṣṇu form. So how can He be an ordinary human being? A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on Bhagavad-gītā because he knows what is what. The original verses of Bhagavad-gītā are as clear as the sun; they do not require lamplight from foolish commentators.
</div>
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 11.51|BG 11.51, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">When Arjuna thus saw Kṛṣṇa in His original form, he said: O Janārdana, seeing this humanlike form, so very beautiful, I am now composed in mind, and I am restored to my original nature.</p>
 
<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:BG 11.51 (1972)|BG 11.51 (1972), Translation and Purport]]
</div>
</div>
<div class="purport text"><p>Here the words mānuṣaṁ rūpam clearly indicate the Supreme Personality of Godhead to be originally two-handed. Those who deride Kṛṣṇa as if He were an ordinary person are shown here to be ignorant of His divine nature. If Kṛṣṇa is like an ordinary human being, then how is it possible for Him to show the universal form and again to show the four-handed Nārāyaṇa form? So it is very clearly stated in Bhagavad-gītā that one who thinks that Kṛṣṇa is an ordinary person and who misguides the reader by claiming that it is the impersonal Brahman within Kṛṣṇa speaking is doing the greatest injustice. Kṛṣṇa has actually shown His universal form and His four-handed Viṣṇu form. So how can He be an ordinary human being? A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on Bhagavad-gītā because he knows what is what. The original verses of Bhagavad-gītā are as clear as the sun; they do not require lamplight from foolish commentators.</p>
<div class="quote_translation">
When Arjuna thus saw Kṛṣṇa in His original form, he said: Seeing this humanlike form, so very beautiful, my mind is now pacified, and I am restored to my original nature.
</div>
<div class="text">
Here the words mānuṣaṁ rūpam clearly indicate the Supreme Personality of Godhead to be originally two-handed. Those who deride Kṛṣṇa to be an ordinary person are shown here to be ignorant of His divine nature. If Kṛṣṇa is like an ordinary human being, then how is it possible for Him to show the universal form and again to show the four-handed Nārāyaṇa form? So it is very clearly stated in Bhagavad-gītā that one who thinks that Kṛṣṇa is an ordinary person and misguides the reader by claiming that it is the impersonal Brahman within Kṛṣṇa speaking, is doing the greatest injustice. Kṛṣṇa has actually shown His universal form and His fourhanded Viṣṇu form. So how can He be an ordinary human being? A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on Bhagavad-gītā because he knows what is what. The original verses of Bhagavad-gītā are as clear as the sun; they do not require lamplight from foolish commentators.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 05:18, 30 July 2022

Expressions researched:
"A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on" |"Bhagavad-gītā" |"because he knows what is what"

Bhagavad-gita As it is

BG Chapters 7 - 12

Kṛṣṇa has actually shown His universal form and His fourhanded Viṣṇu form. So how can He be an ordinary human being? A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on Bhagavad-gītā because he knows what is what. The original verses of Bhagavad-gītā are as clear as the sun; they do not require lamplight from foolish commentators.

When Arjuna thus saw Kṛṣṇa in His original form, he said: Seeing this humanlike form, so very beautiful, my mind is now pacified, and I am restored to my original nature.

Here the words mānuṣaṁ rūpam clearly indicate the Supreme Personality of Godhead to be originally two-handed. Those who deride Kṛṣṇa to be an ordinary person are shown here to be ignorant of His divine nature. If Kṛṣṇa is like an ordinary human being, then how is it possible for Him to show the universal form and again to show the four-handed Nārāyaṇa form? So it is very clearly stated in Bhagavad-gītā that one who thinks that Kṛṣṇa is an ordinary person and misguides the reader by claiming that it is the impersonal Brahman within Kṛṣṇa speaking, is doing the greatest injustice. Kṛṣṇa has actually shown His universal form and His fourhanded Viṣṇu form. So how can He be an ordinary human being? A pure devotee is not confused by misguiding commentaries on Bhagavad-gītā because he knows what is what. The original verses of Bhagavad-gītā are as clear as the sun; they do not require lamplight from foolish commentators.