|
|
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| {{terms|"Can one be a householder, I mean, with his normal worldly life, and at the same time be a"}} | | {{terms|"Can one be a householder, I mean, with his normal worldly life, and at the same time be a"}} |
| {{notes|}} | | {{notes|}} |
| {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} | | {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas|Rishab}} |
| {{complete|ALL}} | | {{complete|ALL}} |
| {{first|30Aug11}} | | {{first|30Aug11}} |
| {{last|30Aug11}} | | {{last|18May12}} |
| {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}} | | {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}} |
| {{total|1}} | | {{total|1}} |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| [[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]] | | [[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]] |
| [[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1977]] | | [[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1977]] |
| | [[Category:Questions On... Family Life, Family Members]] |
| | [[Category:Questions On... Varna, Asrama]] |
| | [[Category:Questions On... Devotees of the Hare Krsna Movement]] |
| | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Room Conversations, 1966 - 1977]] |
| | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Room Conversations, 1977]] |
| | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - in India, Hrishikesh]] |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2> | | <div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2> |
| Line 20: |
Line 26: |
| <div class="heading">First of all, what do you mean by householder?... Say me. Explain what is householder. | | <div class="heading">First of all, what do you mean by householder?... Say me. Explain what is householder. |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <span class="link">[[Vanisource: Room Conversation - - May 8, 1977, Hrishikesh| Room Conversation - - May 8, 1977, Hrishikesh]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;" >Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Does anyone have any questions they would like to ask Śrīla Prabhupāda?</p> | | <mp3player>https://s3.amazonaws.com/vanipedia/clip/770508R3-HRISHIKESH_clip1.mp3</mp3player> |
| <p>Indian man (2): Can one be a householder, I mean, with his normal worldly life, and at the same time be a...</p>
| | <span class="link">[[Vanisource: 770508 - Conversation C - Hrishikesh| 770508 - Conversation C - Hrishikesh]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Indian man (2): Can one be a householder, I mean, with his normal worldly life, and at the same time be a...</p> |
| <p>Prabhupāda: First of all, what do you mean by householder?</p> | | <p>Prabhupāda: First of all, what do you mean by householder?</p> |
| <p>Indian man (2): I mean continue the normal, occupation of one's...</p> | | <p>Indian man (2): I mean continue the normal, occupation of one's...</p> |
| Line 28: |
Line 34: |
| <p>Prabhupāda: So that is... Dog is also doing that business.</p> | | <p>Prabhupāda: So that is... Dog is also doing that business.</p> |
| <p>Indian man (2): Pardon?</p> | | <p>Indian man (2): Pardon?</p> |
| <p>Prabhupāda: Dog is also doing that. Is he householder? Taking care of children, the dog is also doing that. So is he householder? First of all, you do not know what is meant by householder. Taking care of children, that is done by the birds. In the nest the small kiddies are there, and they are bringing food and pushing in the mouth, (makes bird noise:) "Tee, tee, tee, tee, tee." Are they householder? And if you think they are householder, you are also householder like the dogs and birds. You do not know what is householder. Therefore you have to consult śāstra, who is a householder. Śāstra says, pitā na sa syāj jananī na sā syāt, na mocayed yaḥ samupeta-mṛtyum: "You should not become a father and mother unless you take the responsibility for children that no more birth." Because this is the problem, janma-mṛtyu-jarā-vyādhi-duḥkha-doṣānudarśanam ([[Vanisource:BG 13.9|BG 13.9]]). If you are so able father and mother that you can stop this miserable condition of your children, then you become householder. That is householder. Otherwise what is the use of becoming a householder like dogs and cats? There is no use. There are so many cats and dogs. What is use of increasing? Now government is forcing: "Do not produce cats and dogs. Take these inhibitions(?)." Because the whole world is fed up with these cats and dogs householders. Real householder is, śāstra says, "Don't become a father, don't become a mother, if you cannot protect your children..." Samupeta-mṛtyum. And they are required. If you can do that, then you are welcome. You can produce hundreds of children. But you cannot protect yourself; how you'll be able to protect your children? All bogus. Householder is allowed, as brahmacārī-āśrama, gṛhastha-āśrama. It is not meant that... Big, big personality were householder. Lord Rāmacandra was householder. Arjuna was householder. Prahlāda Mahārāja was a householder. Janaka Mahārāja was householder. But they were not cats and dogs. So be householder. You do the duty of real householder. Don't become cats and dogs. Then where is human civili...? What is the distinct between cats and dogs and human civilization if you do the same thing? Āhāra-nidrā-bhaya-maithuna. Then you are huma..., not even human being. What is the question of householder? Be householder as it is in the civilized codes, human history, they are... Otherwise refrain. Householder does not mean to satisfy, what is called, itching sensation of the genitals. That is not householder. Yan maithunādi-gṛhamedhi-sukhaṁ hi tuccham ([[Vanisource:SB 7.9.45|SB 7.9.45]]). To satisfy the itching sensation, that is not householder. Here is householder. Protect your children from death. Can you do that? That kind of householder, at least, the trees on the street, everywhere... There is no question of becoming householder. The whole Bhagavad-gītā... Arjuna, he was householder. He was politician. So he did not give up anything. Before his hearing Bhagavad-gītā he was the same, a large family, and he was fighting for some material interests. And after hearing Bhagavad-gītā he remained the same, not that he gave up fighting and went to the forest. These things are not required. But he changed his consciousness-kariṣye vacanaṁ tava ([[Vanisource:BG 18.73|BG 18.73]]). And that is required. You remain in any condition of life, but follow the instruction of Kṛṣṇa. That is the perfection.</p> | | <p>Prabhupāda: Dog is also doing that. Is he householder? Taking care of children, the dog is also doing that. So is he householder? First of all, you do not know what is meant by householder. Taking care of children, that is done by the birds. In the nest the small kiddies are there, and they are bringing food and pushing in the mouth, (makes bird noise:) "Tee, tee, tee, tee, tee." Are they householder? And if you think they are householder, you are also householder like the dogs and birds. You do not know what is householder. Therefore you have to consult śāstra, who is a householder. Śāstra says, pitā na sa syāj jananī na sā syāt, na mocayed yaḥ samupeta-mṛtyum: "You should not become a father and mother unless you take the responsibility for children that no more birth." Because this is the problem, janma-mṛtyu-jarā-vyādhi-duḥkha-doṣānudarśanam ([[Vanisource:BG 13.8-12 (1972)|BG 13.9]]). If you are so able father and mother that you can stop this miserable condition of your children, then you become householder. That is householder. Otherwise what is the use of becoming a householder like dogs and cats? There is no use. There are so many cats and dogs. What is use of increasing? Now government is forcing: "Do not produce cats and dogs. Take these inhibitions(?)." Because the whole world is fed up with these cats and dogs householders. Real householder is, śāstra says, "Don't become a father, don't become a mother, if you cannot protect your children..." Samupeta-mṛtyum. And they are required. If you can do that, then you are welcome. You can produce hundreds of children. But you cannot protect yourself; how you'll be able to protect your children? All bogus. Householder is allowed, as brahmacārī-āśrama, gṛhastha-āśrama. It is not meant that... Big, big personality were householder. Lord Rāmacandra was householder. Arjuna was householder. Prahlāda Mahārāja was a householder. Janaka Mahārāja was householder. But they were not cats and dogs. So be householder. You do the duty of real householder. Don't become cats and dogs. Then where is human civili...? What is the distinct between cats and dogs and human civilization if you do the same thing? Āhāra-nidrā-bhaya-maithuna. Then you are huma..., not even human being. What is the question of householder? Be householder as it is in the civilized codes, human history, they are... Otherwise refrain. Householder does not mean to satisfy, what is called, itching sensation of the genitals. That is not householder. Yan maithunādi-gṛhamedhi-sukhaṁ hi tuccham ([[Vanisource:SB 7.9.45|SB 7.9.45]]). To satisfy the itching sensation, that is not householder. Here is householder. Protect your children from death. Can you do that? That kind of householder, at least, the trees on the street, everywhere... There is no question of becoming householder. The whole Bhagavad-gītā... Arjuna, he was householder. He was politician. So he did not give up anything. Before his hearing Bhagavad-gītā he was the same, a large family, and he was fighting for some material interests. And after hearing Bhagavad-gītā he remained the same, not that he gave up fighting and went to the forest. These things are not required. But he changed his consciousness-kariṣye vacanaṁ tava ([[Vanisource:BG 18.73 (1972)|BG 18.73]]). And that is required. You remain in any condition of life, but follow the instruction of Kṛṣṇa. That is the perfection.</p> |
| </div> | | </div> |
| </div> | | </div> |
| </div> | | </div> |
