All public logs
Combined display of all available logs of Vaniquotes. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).
- 02:14, 15 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs deleted page So all living entities, as Krishna said, existed in a different body. Now existing in a different body. This is called evolution or transmigration. Evolution theory is there. Not theory, fact. In the Padma Purana. It is not Darwin's invention (content was: '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Evolution theory is there. Not theory, fact. In the Padma Purana... It is not Darwin's invention"}} {{notes|}…' (and the only contributor was 'MayapurUK'))
- 14:40, 14 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs moved page Even Darwin's theory. He's proposing, Perhaps; it may be, and he's writing a big book, anthropology. And people are taking knowledge from that book. So if his knowledge based on Perhaps; maybe, what is the value of that knowledge? to Even Darwin's theory. He's proposing, "Perhaps; it may be," and he's writing a big book, anthropology. And people are taking knowledge from that book. So if his knowledge based on "Perhaps; maybe," what is the value
- 13:34, 14 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs deleted page So if his (Darwin's) knowledge is based on perhaps and maybe, what is the value of that knowledge? (content was: '#REDIRECT Even Darwin's theory. He's proposing, Perhaps; it may be, and he's writing a big book, anthropology. And people are taking knowledge from that boo…' (and the only contributor was 'MayapurUK'))
- 13:33, 14 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs moved page So if his (Darwin's) knowledge is based on perhaps and maybe, what is the value of that knowledge? to Even Darwin's theory. He's proposing, Perhaps; it may be, and he's writing a big book, anthropology. And people are taking knowledge from that book. So if his knowledge based on Perhaps; maybe, what is the value of that knowledge?
- 12:44, 11 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs deleted page According to Darwin's theory, 5000 years ago, men were uncivilized. Now this literature is written by uncivilized men (content was: '#REDIRECT According to Darwin's theory, 5000 years ago, men were uncivilized. Now this literature is written by uncivilized men.Just see. So highly intellec…' (and the only contributor was 'MayapurUK'))
- 12:44, 11 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs moved page According to Darwin's theory, 5000 years ago, men were uncivilized. Now this literature is written by uncivilized men to According to Darwin's theory, 5000 years ago, men were uncivilized. Now this literature is written by uncivilized men.Just see. So highly intellectual writings, they were uncivilized. Now they have become civilized. That is Darwin's theory
- 11:53, 9 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs deleted page It is not a new idea, but educators are giving stress only to Darwin's theory, although in Vedic literature we have immense information of the living conditions in this material world (content was: '#REDIRECT It (evolution) is not a new idea, but educators are giving stress only to Darwin's theory, although in Vedic literature we have immense informatio…' (and the only contributor was 'MayapurUK'))
- 11:52, 9 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs moved page It is not a new idea, but educators are giving stress only to Darwin's theory, although in Vedic literature we have immense information of the living conditions in this material world to It (evolution) is not a new idea, but educators are giving stress only to Darwin's theory, although in Vedic literature we have immense information of the living conditions in this material world
- 11:51, 9 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs deleted page Darwin's theory of evolution from animal to man is incomplete because the theory does not present the reverse condition, namely evolution from man to animal (content was: '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Darwin's theory of evolution from animal to man is incomplete because the theory does not present the reverse condition, namely evolution from man to animal"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Alakan…')
- 11:41, 9 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs deleted page Then there is anumana, inductive knowledge: "It may be like this"—hypothesis. For instance, Darwin's theory says it may be like this, it may be like that. But that is not science (content was: '#REDIRECT Then there is anumana, inductive knowledge - hypothesis. For instance, Darwin's theory says it may be like this, it may be like that. But that is …' (and the only contributor was 'MayapurUK'))
- 11:40, 9 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs moved page Then there is anumana, inductive knowledge: "It may be like this"—hypothesis. For instance, Darwin's theory says it may be like this, it may be like that. But that is not science to Then there is anumana, inductive knowledge - hypothesis. For instance, Darwin's theory says it may be like this, it may be like that. But that is not science
- 11:39, 9 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs deleted page For materialistic anthropologists speculating on the evolution of the body, a person like Darwin is a mahajan (content was: '#REDIRECT For materialistic anthropologists speculating on the evolution of the body, a person like Darwin is a mahajana' (and the only contributor was 'MayapurUK'))
- 11:39, 9 May 2012 MayapurUK talk contribs moved page For materialistic anthropologists speculating on the evolution of the body, a person like Darwin is a mahajan to For materialistic anthropologists speculating on the evolution of the body, a person like Darwin is a mahajana