|
|
Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| {{total|1}} | | {{total|1}} |
| {{toc right}} | | {{toc right}} |
| [[Category:We Are]] | | [[Category:I Am Presenting (Prabhupada)]] |
| [[Category:Presented]]
| |
| [[Category:Fact]] | | [[Category:Fact]] |
| [[Category:Myth]] | | [[Category:Myth]] |
| [[Category:That]]
| |
| [[Category:Should Be]] | | [[Category:Should Be]] |
| [[Category:Spirit Of]] | | [[Category:Spirit Of]] |
| [[Category:our]] | | [[Category:our]] |
| [[Category:Artist]] | | [[Category:Our Artists - Their Paintings & Pictures (Disciples of SP)]] |
| [[Category:Our Philosophy]] | | [[Category:Our Philosophy]] |
| [[Category:Writing Our Books]] | | [[Category:Writing My Books (Prabhupada)]] |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2> | | <div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2> |
Line 29: |
Line 27: |
| <div class="heading">So we are presenting facts, not mythology. That should be the spirit of all our artists and philosophy, writing. | | <div class="heading">So we are presenting facts, not mythology. That should be the spirit of all our artists and philosophy, writing. |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation -- July 4, 1972, New York|Room Conversation -- July 4, 1972, New York]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Devotee (9): Śrīla Prabhupāda? You said you want to present more philosophy in Back to Godhead magazine. Does that mean that we should make it more and more sophisticated? Or does that mean that we should try to present the philosophy in the easiest way?</p> | | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:720704 - Conversation with Yadurani - New York|Conversation with Yadurani - July 4, 1972, New York]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Devotee (9): Śrīla Prabhupāda? You said you want to present more philosophy in Back to Godhead magazine. Does that mean that we should make it more and more sophisticated? Or does that mean that we should try to present the philosophy in the easiest way?</p> |
| <p>Prabhupāda: You should insert articles. It is reality. It is not speculation. Nothing, our activity, is speculation or imaginary. Everything is fact. We should present in that way. Either picture or philosophy, anything. They are all facts. People may not take it as something imagination. That argument will be there. Just like here there is a picture, Dakṣa is with a goat head. But they may not take it as imagination. That is possible. It is fact.</p> | | <p>Prabhupāda: You should insert articles. It is reality. It is not speculation. Nothing, our activity, is speculation or imaginary. Everything is fact. We should present in that way. Either picture or philosophy, anything. They are all facts. People may not take it as something imagination. That argument will be there. Just like here there is a picture, Dakṣa is with a goat head. But they may not take it as imagination. That is possible. It is fact.</p> |
| <p>Devotee (9): So the..., our business is to present it in such a way that people will...</p> | | <p>Devotee (9): So the..., our business is to present it in such a way that people will...</p> |