Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Those who are actually followers of Vedas, they should understand that there is no difference between the Lord and His words - absolute. We read Bhagavad-gita, the words of Krsna. Then how we can change the meaning of Gita when it is spoken by Lord?: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"those who are actually followers of Vedas, they should understand that there is no difference between the Lord and His words"|...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id="compilation">
<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"those who are actually followers of Vedas, they should understand that there is no difference between the Lord and His words"|"absolute. We read Bhagavad-gita, the words of Krsna. Then how we can change the meaning of Gita when it is spoken by Lord"}}
{{terms|"those who are actually followers of ''Vedas'', they should understand that there is no difference between the Lord and His words—absolute. We read ''Bhagavad-gītā'', the words of Kṛṣṇa. Then how we can change the meaning of ''Gītā'' when it is spoken by Lord"}}
{{notes|}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|TariniKalindi}}
{{compiler|TariniKalindi}}
Line 10: Line 10:
{{total|1}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Those Who Are (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:We Who Are (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Actually]]
[[Category:Actually Following]]
[[Category:Followers]]
[[Category:Vedas]]
[[Category:Vedas]]
[[Category:They Should (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:We Should (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Understand]]
[[Category:Understanding the Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:That]]
[[Category:There Is No Difference]]
[[Category:There Is No Difference]]
[[Category:Between]]
[[Category:Not Different from Krsna]]
[[Category:Lord]]
[[Category:Between Krsna and]]
[[Category:His (God)]]
[[Category:Krsna and Krsna's Words are Identical]]
[[Category:Words]]
[[Category:Krsna Is Absolute]]
[[Category:Absolute]]
[[Category:We (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:We (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Reading Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Reading the Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Krsna]]
[[Category:Krsna and the Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Then]]
[[Category:How]]
[[Category:We Can (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:We Can (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Change]]
[[Category:We Can Change]]
[[Category:Meaning Of...]]
[[Category:Meaning Of...]]
[[Category:Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:When]]
[[Category:When]]
[[Category:It Is]]
[[Category:Krsna's Speaking]]
[[Category:Spoken by Krsna]]
[[Category:Questions Posed by Srila Prabhupada]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1966 - 1977]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1970]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, Srimad-Bhagavatam]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - in India, Surat]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="section">
<div id="section">
Line 44: Line 42:
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
<div class="quote_heading">
Those who are actually followers of Vedas, they should understand that there is no difference between the Lord and His words - absolute. We read Bhagavad-gita, the words of Krsna. Then how we can change the meaning of Gita when it is spoken by Lord? Does it mean that I am greater than the Lord?.
Those who are actually followers of Vedas, they should understand that there is no difference between the Lord and His words - absolute. We read Bhagavad-gita, the words of Krsna. Then how we can change the meaning of Gita when it is spoken by Lord? Does it mean that I am greater than the Lord?
</div>
</div>


<mp3player>https://vanipedia.s3.amazonaws.com/clip/701222SB-SURAT_clip001.mp3</mp3player>
<div class="quote_link">
<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:701222 - Lecture SB 06.01.40 - Surat|701222 - Lecture SB 06.01.40 - Surat]]
[[Vanisource:701222 - Lecture SB 06.01.40 - Surat|701222 - Lecture SB 06.01.40 - Surat]]
</div>
</div>
<div class="text">
<div class="text">
Therefore the science of God is for persons who are not envious. That is religion. Bhāgavata , in the Bhāgavata you will find in the beginning it is said, dharmaḥ projjhita-kaitavaḥ atra paramo nirmatsarāṇāṁ satām: [[Vanisource:SB 1.1.2|SB 1.1.2]] "Here the religion of Bhāgavata is not a cheating religion." Kaitava. Kaitava means cheating, cheating. And Śrīdhara Svāmī has remarked, commented on the statement, kaitava. He says that atra mokṣa-vāñchā-paryantaṁ nirastam:(?) "Anyone who is trying to become liberated or merge into the existence of God, that is also cheating." Nirastam: that is also nullified, nirastam. Why? Why the...? A person who is trying to be merged into the existence of God, jñānīs... Those who are philosophically advancing, they are called jñānīs. The Absolute Truth Idea is that "Because I am Brahman, and God is also Brahman, therefore, as soon as I am freed from māyā, I become one with God." In one sense it is all right because God and the living entity, they are of the same quality. As it is stated in the Vedas, nityo nityānām. There are millions and trillions of nityas, eternals. So God is the chief eternal. Therefore quality, eternity, is there both for the living entities and God. Nityo nityānāṁ cetanaś cetanānām ( Kaṭha Upaniṣad 2.2.13) . Knowledge, sense, cetana, life, activities... So God is also active; the living entities are also active. But His actions and my actions are not comparable. Just like God is creator; I am also creator. So in this way I am one. I have got creative power; God has also creative power. But God creates innumerable universes, and you can create a motorcar. That's all, no more. Or atom bomb—to kill. You cannot create a planet; you can create a sputnik. With great difficulty it flies in the sky. But God's creation—innumerable planets, they are floating without any machine. Still, the rascal says, "There is no God. I am God." You do like God; then you become God. What you have done like God? You have created a toy flying in the sky. Therefore you are so much proud that you compare yourself with God? This is called demons, demonic. Unnecessarily, without any authority, when a man claims that "I am God," that is demonic.
You cannot create a planet; you can create a sputnik. With great difficulty it flies in the sky. But God's creation—innumerable planets, they are floating without any machine. Still, the rascal says: "There is no God. I am God." You do like God; then you become God. What you have done like God? You have created a toy flying in the sky. Therefore you are so much proud that you compare yourself with God? This is called demons, demonic. Unnecessarily, without any authority, when a man claims that "I am God," that is demonic.
 
Now, just like Hiraṇyakaśipu, Rāvaṇa. Rāvaṇa was materially very much powerful, but he defied Rāma: "What is Rāma? I am more than Rāma. I shall kidnap His wife, and I shall enjoy." So this is Rāvaṇa, Rāvaṇa spirit. Sītā . . . Sītā is Lakṣmī. Lakṣmī is the goddess of fortune. So God is the husband of the goddess of fortune, and goddess of fortune is under His control.
 
''Lakṣmī-sahasra-śata-sambhrama-sevyamānam'' (Bs. 5.29). Thousands and millions of goddesses of fortune are serving the Supreme Lord, and I am thinking that "God has become poor, ''daridra'', ''daridra-nārāyaṇa''." And what does . . .? Nārāyaṇa, He is so great authority that His words are accepted as Vedic truth, and He has become ''daridra''? These are all demonic declaration.
 
So sincere . . . those who are actually followers of ''Vedas'', they should understand that there is no difference between the Lord and His words—absolute. We read ''Bhagavad-gītā'', the words of Kṛṣṇa. Then how we can change the meaning of ''Gītā'' when it is spoken by Lord? Does it mean that I am greater than the Lord? "Kṛṣṇa left something to be told by some rascals later on"—is that the meaning of ''Bhagavad-gītā''? Then where is the authority of ''Bhagavad-gītā''? If the meaning was to be corrected and commented by a conditioned soul, then where is the authority of ''Bhagavad-gītā''? Then what is the necessity of reading ''Bhagavad-gītā''? Simply because it is written in Sanskrit? No. That is not the fact.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 06:39, 16 July 2022

Expressions researched:
"those who are actually followers of Vedas, they should understand that there is no difference between the Lord and His words—absolute. We read Bhagavad-gītā, the words of Kṛṣṇa. Then how we can change the meaning of Gītā when it is spoken by Lord"

Lectures

Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures

Those who are actually followers of Vedas, they should understand that there is no difference between the Lord and His words - absolute. We read Bhagavad-gita, the words of Krsna. Then how we can change the meaning of Gita when it is spoken by Lord? Does it mean that I am greater than the Lord?


You cannot create a planet; you can create a sputnik. With great difficulty it flies in the sky. But God's creation—innumerable planets, they are floating without any machine. Still, the rascal says: "There is no God. I am God." You do like God; then you become God. What you have done like God? You have created a toy flying in the sky. Therefore you are so much proud that you compare yourself with God? This is called demons, demonic. Unnecessarily, without any authority, when a man claims that "I am God," that is demonic.

Now, just like Hiraṇyakaśipu, Rāvaṇa. Rāvaṇa was materially very much powerful, but he defied Rāma: "What is Rāma? I am more than Rāma. I shall kidnap His wife, and I shall enjoy." So this is Rāvaṇa, Rāvaṇa spirit. Sītā . . . Sītā is Lakṣmī. Lakṣmī is the goddess of fortune. So God is the husband of the goddess of fortune, and goddess of fortune is under His control.

Lakṣmī-sahasra-śata-sambhrama-sevyamānam (Bs. 5.29). Thousands and millions of goddesses of fortune are serving the Supreme Lord, and I am thinking that "God has become poor, daridra, daridra-nārāyaṇa." And what does . . .? Nārāyaṇa, He is so great authority that His words are accepted as Vedic truth, and He has become daridra? These are all demonic declaration.

So sincere . . . those who are actually followers of Vedas, they should understand that there is no difference between the Lord and His words—absolute. We read Bhagavad-gītā, the words of Kṛṣṇa. Then how we can change the meaning of Gītā when it is spoken by Lord? Does it mean that I am greater than the Lord? "Kṛṣṇa left something to be told by some rascals later on"—is that the meaning of Bhagavad-gītā? Then where is the authority of Bhagavad-gītā? If the meaning was to be corrected and commented by a conditioned soul, then where is the authority of Bhagavad-gītā? Then what is the necessity of reading Bhagavad-gītā? Simply because it is written in Sanskrit? No. That is not the fact.