The same concise form of the Bhagavatam concerned the pastimes of Lord Krsna and was never meant for impersonal indulgence: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"the same concise form of the Bhagavatam concerned the pastimes of Lord Krsna and was never meant for impersonal indulgence"}} {{n…') |
(Removed from deleted category 'Was') |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[Category:Same]] | [[Category:Same]] | ||
[[Category:Concise]] | [[Category:Concise]] | ||
[[Category:Form]] | [[Category:Form of the Srimad-Bhagavatam]] | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam | [[Category:Krsna and the Srimad-Bhagavatam]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Krsna's Concerns]] | ||
[[Category:Krsna's Pastimes]] | [[Category:Krsna's Pastimes]] | ||
[[Category:Never]] | [[Category:Never]] | ||
[[Category:Not Meant For]] | [[Category:Not Meant For]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:13, 3 March 2021
Expressions researched:
"the same concise form of the Bhagavatam concerned the pastimes of Lord Krsna and was never meant for impersonal indulgence"
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 3
O Uddhava, in the lotus millennium in the days of yore, at the beginning of the creation, I spoke unto Brahmā, who is situated on the lotus that grows out of My navel, about My transcendental glories, which the great sages describe as Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.
The explanation of the Supreme Self, as given to Brahmā and already explained in the Second Canto of this great literature, is further clarified herein. The Lord said that the concise form of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam as explained to Brahmā was meant to elucidate His personality. The impersonal explanation of those four verses in the Second Canto is nullified herewith. Śrīdhara Svāmī also explains in this connection that the same concise form of the Bhāgavatam concerned the pastimes of Lord Kṛṣṇa and was never meant for impersonal indulgence.