Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


So far we are concerned we are following the Bhagavad-gita As It Is and we see the knowledge given in the Bhagavad-gita is quite perfect in the matter of understanding God: Difference between revisions

(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"So far we are concerned we are following the Bhagavad-gita As It Is"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} {{complete|ALL}} {{f…')
 
m (Moved from category 'Understand God' to category 'Understanding God')
 
Line 3: Line 3:
{{terms|"So far we are concerned we are following the Bhagavad-gita As It Is"}}
{{terms|"So far we are concerned we are following the Bhagavad-gita As It Is"}}
{{notes|}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}}
{{compiler|MadhuGopaldas|Rishab}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|05Dec10}}
{{first|05Dec10}}
Line 13: Line 13:
[[Category:We Are (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:We Are (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:I Am (Prabhupada)]]
[[Category:I Am (Prabhupada)]]
[[Category:Following]]
[[Category:My Following (Prabhupada)]]
[[Category:Our Following (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Following the Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Bhagavad-gita As It Is]]
[[Category:Bhagavad-gita As It Is]]
[[Category:I See (Prabhupada)]]
[[Category:I See (Prabhupada)]]
[[Category:Knowledge]]
[[Category:Knowledge]]
[[Category:Given By Krsna]]
[[Category:Knowledge of the Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Krsna's Giving]]
[[Category:What is the Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Quite]]
[[Category:Quite]]
[[Category:Perfect]]
[[Category:Perfect]]
[[Category:In the Matter Of]]
[[Category:In the Matter Of]]
[[Category:Understanding]]
[[Category:Understanding God]]
[[Category:God]]
[[Category:Understanding the Bhagavad-gita]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2>
<div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2>
Line 30: Line 33:
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAndrewParcoSanFranciscoCalif7October1972_0" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="534" link="Letter to Andrew Parco -- San Francisco Calif. 7 October, 1972" link_text="Letter to Andrew Parco -- San Francisco Calif. 7 October, 1972">
<div id="LettertoAndrewParcoSanFranciscoCalif7October1972_0" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="534" link="Letter to Andrew Parco -- San Francisco Calif. 7 October, 1972" link_text="Letter to Andrew Parco -- San Francisco Calif. 7 October, 1972">
<div class="heading">So far we are concerned we are following the Bhagavad-gita As It Is and we see the knowledge given in the Bhagavad-gita is quite perfect in the matter of understanding God.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Andrew Parco -- San Francisco Calif. 7 October, 1972|Letter to Andrew Parco -- San Francisco Calif. 7 October, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I beg to thank you for your letter dated Oct. 4. 1972. If you are actually very much eager to search out God, you should know that logic and argument cannot help you because the opposing elements may be better logicians and may convert your decision by better logical arguments. So far books are concerned, they are differently described for different types of men and a philosopher. So we cannot decide either from the books or by philosophical speculation or by argument and logic. So the best thing is that you find out yourself who you think is the right person in the matter of science of God.</p>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Andrew Parco -- San Francisco Calif. 7 October, 1972|Letter to Andrew Parco -- San Francisco Calif. 7 October, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I beg to thank you for your letter dated Oct. 4. 1972. If you are actually very much eager to search out God, you should know that logic and argument cannot help you because the opposing elements may be better logicians and may convert your decision by better logical arguments. So far books are concerned, they are differently described for different types of men and a philosopher. So we cannot decide either from the books or by philosophical speculation or by argument and logic. So the best thing is that you find out yourself who you think is the right person in the matter of science of God.</p>
<p>So far we are concerned we are following the Bhagavad-gita As It Is and we see the knowledge given in the Bhagavad-gita is quite perfect in the matter of understanding God. If we compare the truth mentioned in the Bhagavad-gita with other books, sometimes there may not be equal standard of understanding. So it is better to accept some recognized authority and follow his footsteps, and that is the best way for understanding God. we simply want that people should understand God, and love him also, because human life is meant for this purpose. So if a man loves God more than anything else, he is the perfect man.</p>
<p>So far we are concerned we are following the Bhagavad-gita As It Is and we see the knowledge given in the Bhagavad-gita is quite perfect in the matter of understanding God. If we compare the truth mentioned in the Bhagavad-gita with other books, sometimes there may not be equal standard of understanding. So it is better to accept some recognized authority and follow his footsteps, and that is the best way for understanding God. we simply want that people should understand God, and love him also, because human life is meant for this purpose. So if a man loves God more than anything else, he is the perfect man.</p>

Latest revision as of 15:23, 3 July 2020

Expressions researched:
"So far we are concerned we are following the Bhagavad-gita As It Is"

Correspondence

1972 Correspondence

So far we are concerned we are following the Bhagavad-gita As It Is and we see the knowledge given in the Bhagavad-gita is quite perfect in the matter of understanding God.
Letter to Andrew Parco -- San Francisco Calif. 7 October, 1972:

I beg to thank you for your letter dated Oct. 4. 1972. If you are actually very much eager to search out God, you should know that logic and argument cannot help you because the opposing elements may be better logicians and may convert your decision by better logical arguments. So far books are concerned, they are differently described for different types of men and a philosopher. So we cannot decide either from the books or by philosophical speculation or by argument and logic. So the best thing is that you find out yourself who you think is the right person in the matter of science of God.

So far we are concerned we are following the Bhagavad-gita As It Is and we see the knowledge given in the Bhagavad-gita is quite perfect in the matter of understanding God. If we compare the truth mentioned in the Bhagavad-gita with other books, sometimes there may not be equal standard of understanding. So it is better to accept some recognized authority and follow his footsteps, and that is the best way for understanding God. we simply want that people should understand God, and love him also, because human life is meant for this purpose. So if a man loves God more than anything else, he is the perfect man.

I wish that you may follow this principle and be happy.