|
|
Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| {{terms|"Do you believe that the Gita should be followed as it is or interpretation"}} | | {{terms|"Do you believe that the Gita should be followed as it is or interpretation"}} |
| {{notes|}} | | {{notes|}} |
| {{compiler|SunitaS}} | | {{compiler|SunitaS|Rishab}} |
| {{complete|ALL}} | | {{complete|ALL}} |
| {{first|17Aug11}} | | {{first|17Aug11}} |
| {{last|17Aug11}} | | {{last|23May12}} |
| {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}} | | {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}} |
| {{total|1}} | | {{total|1}} |
Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| [[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]] | | [[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]] |
| [[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1976]] | | [[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1976]] |
| | [[Category:Questions On... Bhagavad-gita]] |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2> | | <div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2> |
Line 25: |
Line 26: |
| <p>Prabhupāda: Yes, yes. If you read somebody's book, you must read the author's version. Why should you bring interpretation? This is... You have no business. If you want to say something of your philosophy, you can say, but why do you take Bhagavad-gītā and give your own interpretation? That is very bad.</p> | | <p>Prabhupāda: Yes, yes. If you read somebody's book, you must read the author's version. Why should you bring interpretation? This is... You have no business. If you want to say something of your philosophy, you can say, but why do you take Bhagavad-gītā and give your own interpretation? That is very bad.</p> |
| <p>Guest (3): But can you not apply your own philos...</p> | | <p>Guest (3): But can you not apply your own philos...</p> |
| <p>Prabhupāda: Why? Why should you? If you take Bhagavad-gītā, you should speak what Bhagavad-gītā is saying. And interpretation is required when the thing is not understood clearly. There you get interpretation. Unnecessarily, why should you interpret Bhagavad-gītā? You have no right. Dharma-kṣetre kuru-kṣetre samavetā yuyutsavaḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 1.1|BG 1.1]]). So anyone can understand there is a place Kurukṣetra still. Why should you interpret, "Kurukṣetra means this body and this and that," why? What is the necessity? Do you think there is necessity?</p> | | <p>Prabhupāda: Why? Why should you? If you take Bhagavad-gītā, you should speak what Bhagavad-gītā is saying. And interpretation is required when the thing is not understood clearly. There you get interpretation. Unnecessarily, why should you interpret Bhagavad-gītā? You have no right. Dharma-kṣetre kuru-kṣetre samavetā yuyutsavaḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 1.1 (1972)|BG 1.1]]). So anyone can understand there is a place Kurukṣetra still. Why should you interpret, "Kurukṣetra means this body and this and that," why? What is the necessity? Do you think there is necessity?</p> |
| <p>Guest (3): But just as...</p> | | <p>Guest (3): But just as...</p> |
| <p>Prabhupāda: No, no. First of all let us settle, that Bhagavad-gītā begins</p> | | <p>Prabhupāda: No, no. First of all let us settle, that Bhagavad-gītā begins</p> |
Line 32: |
Line 33: |
| :māmakāḥ pāṇḍavāś caiva | | :māmakāḥ pāṇḍavāś caiva |
| :kim akurvata sañjaya | | :kim akurvata sañjaya |
| :([[Vanisource:BG 1.1|BG 1.1]]) | | :([[Vanisource:BG 1.1 (1972)|BG 1.1]]) |
| <p>So Mahābhārata is the history and there was Battle of Kurukṣetra. And that Kurukṣetra is mentioned there in the Bhagavad-gītā, and it is dharma-kṣetra since Vedic age. So the word used, dharma-kṣetre and kuru-kṣetre, it is completely understood. Why should you interpret unless you have got a motive. And why a sane man accepts that interpretation? If you have got a different philosophy you can write your own book. Why should you cheat others, taking Bhagavad-gītā and interpreting in your own way? This has spoiled the whole thing. And Kṛṣṇa says that as soon as you deviate from the disciplic succession system then it will be lost. So what is the use of reading something which is already lost? If I want to supply you something food, it must be fresh and palatable. Then you'll enjoy. But if it is rotten, decomposed, and if we supply you that foodstuff, what you will enjoy and what you will get benefit out of it?</p> | | <p>So Mahābhārata is the history and there was Battle of Kurukṣetra. And that Kurukṣetra is mentioned there in the Bhagavad-gītā, and it is dharma-kṣetra since Vedic age. So the word used, dharma-kṣetre and kuru-kṣetre, it is completely understood. Why should you interpret unless you have got a motive. And why a sane man accepts that interpretation? If you have got a different philosophy you can write your own book. Why should you cheat others, taking Bhagavad-gītā and interpreting in your own way? This has spoiled the whole thing. And Kṛṣṇa says that as soon as you deviate from the disciplic succession system then it will be lost. So what is the use of reading something which is already lost? If I want to supply you something food, it must be fresh and palatable. Then you'll enjoy. But if it is rotten, decomposed, and if we supply you that foodstuff, what you will enjoy and what you will get benefit out of it?</p> |
| </div> | | </div> |
| </div> | | </div> |
| </div> | | </div> |