Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Disagreement (Letters): Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{terms|disagree | disagreeable | disagreed | disagreeing | disagreement | disagreements | disagrees}}
<div id="compilation">
 
<div id="facts">
{{goal|56}}
{{terms|"disagree"|"disagreeable"|"disagreed"|"disagreeing"|"disagreement"|"disagreements"|"disagreements"|"disagrees"}}
 
{{notes|}}
{{notes|}}
 
{{compiler|Visnu Murti|Serene}}
{{compiler|Visnu Murti}}
{{complete|ALL}}
 
{{complete|}}
 
{{first|24Nov08}}
{{first|24Nov08}}
 
{{last|27Feb10}}
{{last|24Nov08}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=57}}
 
{{total|57}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=1}}
 
{{total|1}}
 
{{toc right}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Disagreement|1]]
[[Category:Disagreement|1]]
 
[[Category:Compilations from Letters]]
[[Category:Letters]]
</div>
 
<div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2>
== Correspondence ==
</div>
 
<div id="1967_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="2" parent="Correspondence" text="1967 Correspondence"><h3>1967 Correspondence</h3>
=== 1967 Correspondence ===
</div>
 
<div id="LettertoKrsnaDeviDelhi29September1967_0" class="quote" parent="1967_Correspondence" book="Let" index="157" link="Letter to Krsna Devi -- Delhi 29 September, 1967" link_text="Letter to Krsna Devi -- Delhi 29 September, 1967">
<span class="LET-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Krsna Devi -- Delhi 29 September, 1967|Letter to Krsna Devi -- Delhi 29 September, 1967]]:''' Please know it that I do not approve anyone's separation who are married by me. If they disagree, they may live separately, but there cannot be divorce. When one is separate, one may fully devote in Krishna, but no more marriage. If this is not followed, I will not take part in anyone's marriage in the future. I hope you will understand me right and do the needful.</span>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Krsna Devi -- Delhi 29 September, 1967|Letter to Krsna Devi -- Delhi 29 September, 1967]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Please know it that I do not approve anyone's separation who are married by me. If they disagree, they may live separately, but there cannot be divorce. When one is separate, one may fully devote in Krishna, but no more marriage. If this is not followed, I will not take part in anyone's marriage in the future. I hope you will understand me right and do the needful.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1968_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="3" parent="Correspondence" text="1968 Correspondence"><h3>1968 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoYamunaHarsaraniLosAngeles15January1968_0" class="quote" parent="1968_Correspondence" book="Let" index="10" link="Letter to Yamuna, Harsarani -- Los Angeles 15 January, 1968" link_text="Letter to Yamuna, Harsarani -- Los Angeles 15 January, 1968">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Yamuna, Harsarani -- Los Angeles 15 January, 1968|Letter to Yamuna, Harsarani -- Los Angeles 15 January, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I can understand that in some points you disagree with Gargamuni but you have not clearly mentioned what is this point of disagreement. So far I know, Gargamuni's activities are approved by the president Jayananda, and so far I know Gargamuni, he has a business tactfulness, but his aim is to help the society financially. Whatever he does is not for his personal interest but for the interest of the society. If you have any specific grievance, please let me know, but don't be disturbed by any sort of disagreement with your God-brothers and sisters. Each and every living entity is an individual soul and as such disagreement is quite possible in our dealings with one another but we have to consider the central point of interest.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoHarikrishnadasAggarwalLosAngeles3March1968_1" class="quote" parent="1968_Correspondence" book="Let" index="101" link="Letter to Harikrishnadas Aggarwal -- Los Angeles 3 March, 1968" link_text="Letter to Harikrishnadas Aggarwal -- Los Angeles 3 March, 1968">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Harikrishnadas Aggarwal -- Los Angeles 3 March, 1968|Letter to Harikrishnadas Aggarwal -- Los Angeles 3 March, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I have seen it that Swami Akhandananda worships Krishna in his apartment in Bombay. So we request everyone to worship Krishna and chant the Mantra, irrespectively, never mind whether one is a devotee, a fruitive worker, or a salvationist at the ultimate goal. We don't disagree with anyone, namely the Karmis, Jnanis, Yogis, etc, although we are devotees. We simply request everyone to worship Krishna as the Supreme Lord and join with us in this great movement of Krishna Consciousness!</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAniruddhaAllstonMass30May1968_2" class="quote" parent="1968_Correspondence" book="Let" index="178" link="Letter to Aniruddha -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968" link_text="Letter to Aniruddha -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Aniruddha -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968|Letter to Aniruddha -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">You are sinceremost servant of Krishna. I know that you have worked very good for Krishna. I think you should not be disturbed by minor disagreement. If you think that you cannot agree with Umapati, you can stop discussing with him, and if there is any point of judgment, you can refer to me. I am always at your service. So long we are individual souls, there must be disagreement also, because that is the symptom of individuality. But when such individual is surrendered unto Krishna, there should not be any disagreement.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAniruddhaAllstonMass30May1968_3" class="quote" parent="1968_Correspondence" book="Let" index="178" link="Letter to Aniruddha -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968" link_text="Letter to Aniruddha -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Aniruddha -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968|Letter to Aniruddha -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Therefore, I would advise that you should consult with Mukunda about this because he is very calm and coolheaded boy, and then decide whether to go to Santa Fe or not. I am writing separately to Mukunda also, as well as to Umapati in this connection, and I wish to know why there is disagreement. There cannot be any disagreement in discharge of duties in Krishna Consciousness</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMukundaAllstonMass30May1968_4" class="quote" parent="1968_Correspondence" book="Let" index="179" link="Letter to Mukunda -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968" link_text="Letter to Mukunda -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Mukunda -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968|Letter to Mukunda -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">In the meantime, I have received another letter from Aniruddha that he is in disagreement with Umapati. I do now know what is the basis of this disagreement, but when you are there, I request you to see to the matter and try to mitigate their illusory disagreement. Even there is disagreement, the platform should be Krishna Consciousness, and in that platform if there is disagreement there is no inebriety.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoUmapatiAllstonMass30May1968_5" class="quote" parent="1968_Correspondence" book="Let" index="181" link="Letter to Umapati -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968" link_text="Letter to Umapati -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Umapati -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968|Letter to Umapati -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">It is understood that Aniruddha and yourself are sometimes not in agreement in subjects concerning Krishna Consciousness. Of course, disagreements may be there, but there should not be dissension. I shall be glad to hear from you what is the point of dissension, and if it isn't very serious, I think you should ask Aniruddha not to be affected by such flimsy disagreement.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1969_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="4" parent="Correspondence" text="1969 Correspondence"><h3>1969 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGurudasaYamunaLosAngeles21January1969_0" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="47" link="Letter to Gurudasa, Yamuna -- Los Angeles 21 January, 1969" link_text="Letter to Gurudasa, Yamuna -- Los Angeles 21 January, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gurudasa, Yamuna -- Los Angeles 21 January, 1969|Letter to Gurudasa, Yamuna -- Los Angeles 21 January, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">To have some little disagreements amongst yourselves is not very unnatural because we are all individual beings. But as we are all working on behalf of Krishna we should always forget our personal interests and see to the prime cause.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAniruddhaLosAngeles23January1969_1" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="53" link="Letter to Aniruddha -- Los Angeles 23 January, 1969" link_text="Letter to Aniruddha -- Los Angeles 23 January, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Aniruddha -- Los Angeles 23 January, 1969|Letter to Aniruddha -- Los Angeles 23 January, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I can understand from your letter that there has been some disagreements or misunderstandings in the temple, but I think that you should know that all such disturbances must be solved peacefully and with consideration of the entire situation. Cidananda is the president there, and I think you understand rightly that everyone must cooperate with him in keeping the temple nicely and without any unnecessary tensions.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoDayalaNitaiHawaii23March1969_2" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="199" link="Letter to Dayala Nitai -- Hawaii 23 March, 1969" link_text="Letter to Dayala Nitai -- Hawaii 23 March, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Dayala Nitai -- Hawaii 23 March, 1969|Letter to Dayala Nitai -- Hawaii 23 March, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Amongst yourselves there should not be any disagreement. Whatever you do, you do it by joint consultation. Because our center of activities is Krishna, for Krishna's sake we can sacrifice our life, wealth, words, intelligence, everything. Of course, as individuals, we have sometimes disagreements, but that should be adjusted keeping our central attention to Krishna. So what is done is done; hence forward, you do everything jointly and we shall put out at least one issue of BTG French edition every month—even it may consist of one printed page only, still it must be published once monthly.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoKrsnadasaSanFrancisco3April1969_3" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="224" link="Letter to Krsna dasa -- San Francisco 3 April, 1969" link_text="Letter to Krsna dasa -- San Francisco 3 April, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Krsna dasa -- San Francisco 3 April, 1969|Letter to Krsna dasa -- San Francisco 3 April, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So competition, disagreement, or even dissension, if they are there, and the center is Krishna, such disagreement is not material. Even in Krishna Loka, there are rival parties of Srimati Radharani whose name is Candrabali, and there is competition between the two parties how to serve Krishna the best.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSivanandaNewYork13April1969_4" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="232" link="Letter to Sivananda -- New York 13 April, 1969" link_text="Letter to Sivananda -- New York 13 April, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sivananda -- New York 13 April, 1969|Letter to Sivananda -- New York 13 April, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">You have mentioned about the disagreement amongst our god-brothers, and it is a fact. But so far as I am concerned, I am trying to execute my humble bit, and if somebody disagrees in these activities, what can I do? But so far I get their letters, they fully appreciate the work going on here, and I do not know who is the gentleman against these activities.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoVrndavanesvariAllstonMass26April1969_5" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="251" link="Letter to Vrndavanesvari -- Allston, Mass 26 April, 1969" link_text="Letter to Vrndavanesvari -- Allston, Mass 26 April, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Vrndavanesvari -- Allston, Mass 26 April, 1969|Letter to Vrndavanesvari -- Allston, Mass 26 April, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I think if you can start for Germany in the beginning of July, that will be very nice help. The boys who are working there are sometimes in disagreement, so if you go and take charge of the center, it will be a great service.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGopalaKrsnaColumbusOhio13May1969_6" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="282" link="Letter to Gopala Krsna -- Columbus, Ohio 13 May, 1969" link_text="Letter to Gopala Krsna -- Columbus, Ohio 13 May, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gopala Krsna -- Columbus, Ohio 13 May, 1969|Letter to Gopala Krsna -- Columbus, Ohio 13 May, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">But generally the wife is meant to follow wherever the husband goes. Most likely your wife would agree with you—she will not disagree to go. Rather, some girls will be very much encouraged to go to India with her husband. So you may consider on these points and inform me what you have decided.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBrahmanandaMoundsville31May1969_7" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="328" link="Letter to Brahmananda -- Moundsville 31 May, 1969" link_text="Letter to Brahmananda -- Moundsville 31 May, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Brahmananda -- Moundsville 31 May, 1969|Letter to Brahmananda -- Moundsville 31 May, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">That is his policy and the reason he does not give straight answers. Once I talked with him, so I can understand his dealings. His disagreement with the design of TLC means that he wants to do this himself and charge. So I don't think we can trust this man.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoUttamaslokaNewVrindaban7June1969_8" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="350" link="Letter to Uttamasloka -- New Vrindaban 7 June, 1969" link_text="Letter to Uttamasloka -- New Vrindaban 7 June, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Uttamasloka -- New Vrindaban 7 June, 1969|Letter to Uttamasloka -- New Vrindaban 7 June, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">As individuals there may be disagreement sometimes, but that is quite natural. Even in ordinary family affairs there is sometimes disagreement, but that does not mean immediately the disagreeing members shall leave the family. Similarly our Krishna Consciousness Movement means we are all gathering together in families of Krishna.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoLaksmimoniLosAngeles10July1969_9" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="429" link="Letter to Laksmimoni -- Los Angeles 10 July, 1969" link_text="Letter to Laksmimoni -- Los Angeles 10 July, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Laksmimoni -- Los Angeles 10 July, 1969|Letter to Laksmimoni -- Los Angeles 10 July, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">In Krishna Consciousness marriages there is no question of any separation or divorce. Any disagreement between husband and wife is not taken very seriously, as much as a disagreement between children is not taken very seriously.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBrahmanandaHamburg30August1969_10" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="535" link="Letter to Brahmananda -- Hamburg 30 August, 1969" link_text="Letter to Brahmananda -- Hamburg 30 August, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Brahmananda -- Hamburg 30 August, 1969|Letter to Brahmananda -- Hamburg 30 August, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding Hayagriva and Satsvarupa, I think they can become joint editors, and articles to be published in BTG may be jointly decided upon. In case of disagreement the matter should be referred to me, and I shall give the final decision.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBrahmanandaHamburg5September1969_11" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="546" link="Letter to Brahmananda -- Hamburg 5 September, 1969" link_text="Letter to Brahmananda -- Hamburg 5 September, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Brahmananda -- Hamburg 5 September, 1969|Letter to Brahmananda -- Hamburg 5 September, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I am just trying to hand over the whole management in the hands of my devotees, but if there is some disagreement in the management, then the whole thing may not go well. I think therefore, unless you all agree to open another branch in the East Coast, it should not be done.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoDineshTittenhurst31October1969_12" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="640" link="Letter to Dinesh -- Tittenhurst 31 October, 1969" link_text="Letter to Dinesh -- Tittenhurst 31 October, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Dinesh -- Tittenhurst 31 October, 1969|Letter to Dinesh -- Tittenhurst 31 October, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Arjuna was a disciple of Krishna and Brahma was also a disciple of Krishna. Thus there is no disagreement between the conclusions of Brahma and Arjuna. Vyasadeva is in the disciplic succession of Brahma. The teachings to Arjuna was recorded by Vyasadeva verbatim. So according to the axiomatic truth, things equal to one another are equal to each other.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBalaiLondon15November1969_13" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="677" link="Letter to Balai -- London 15 November, 1969" link_text="Letter to Balai -- London 15 November, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Balai -- London 15 November, 1969|Letter to Balai -- London 15 November, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">One thing you should know—of course, I know that you are so nice that there is no possibility amongst you for disagreement between husband and wife; but sometimes it happens—so you can let Saradia know that in our Krishna Consciousness household life there is no question of separation. Our marriage is Absolute. But if sometimes some disagreement is there, they may live separately for a few days, but that does not mean they can think of separation.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAniruddhaLondon26November1969_14" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="698" link="Letter to Aniruddha -- London 26 November, 1969" link_text="Letter to Aniruddha -- London 26 November, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Aniruddha -- London 26 November, 1969|Letter to Aniruddha -- London 26 November, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">The parents arrange for marriage and whatever boy or girl they select for their son or daughter, that is accepted. Even there is some disagreement at times, that is not taken very seriously. In this way, in mature life they become happy. I want to introduce this system in the Western countries, amongst my disciples at least.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGopalaKrsnaLondon26November1969_15" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="701" link="Letter to Gopala Krsna -- London 26 November, 1969" link_text="Letter to Gopala Krsna -- London 26 November, 1969">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gopala Krsna -- London 26 November, 1969|Letter to Gopala Krsna -- London 26 November, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">According to our Vedic civilization, disagreements between husband and wife is not taken very seriously. But the modern age allows divorce even, either by the husband or by the wife. These things are not good. But after marrying, certainly there will be some disagreement or misunderstanding between husband and wife. So consider all these points, and you can decide yourself.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1970_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="5" parent="Correspondence" text="1970 Correspondence"><h3>1970 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSethjiLosAngeles13January1970_0" class="quote" parent="1970_Correspondence" book="Let" index="21" link="Letter to Sethji -- Los Angeles 13 January, 1970" link_text="Letter to Sethji -- Los Angeles 13 January, 1970">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sethji -- Los Angeles 13 January, 1970|Letter to Sethji -- Los Angeles 13 January, 1970]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">It is very nice and I have also mentioned it in the preface of my first volume of Srimad-Bhagavatam. Krishna Consciousness Movement is so nice that it can adjust the disagreement between socialism and capitalism. At the present moment, neither of these isms is perfect from the philosophical point of view, but if both parties take this common formula of Krishna Consciousness each one will supplement the other.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBalimardanaUpendraLosAngeles10May1970_1" class="quote" parent="1970_Correspondence" book="Let" index="300" link="Letter to Bali-mardana, Upendra -- Los Angeles 10 May, 1970" link_text="Letter to Bali-mardana, Upendra -- Los Angeles 10 May, 1970">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Bali-mardana, Upendra -- Los Angeles 10 May, 1970|Letter to Bali-mardana, Upendra -- Los Angeles 10 May, 1970]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Kindly stop this unnecessary misunderstanding. Both Upendra and yourself are competent and experienced, so please adjust your disagreement amongst your selves. It is my request. As a matter of fact, as you are the pioneer in taking all risks to go to Australia, naturally you shall be considered as the leader, but a leader's position is also very grave and responsible. A leader has to lead others very tactfully and intelligently. Kindly therefore do not quarrel, but go on with your duties progressively.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBalimardanaUpendraLosAngeles10May1970_2" class="quote" parent="1970_Correspondence" book="Let" index="300" link="Letter to Bali-mardana, Upendra -- Los Angeles 10 May, 1970" link_text="Letter to Bali-mardana, Upendra -- Los Angeles 10 May, 1970">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Bali-mardana, Upendra -- Los Angeles 10 May, 1970|Letter to Bali-mardana, Upendra -- Los Angeles 10 May, 1970]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">We have to gather our strength by chanting the beads sixteen rounds regularly and praying to the lotus feet of Krsna for guidance.</p>
<p>I hope both of you will kindly follow my instruction and forget if there is any accidental disagreement.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAdvaitaCalcutta7October1970_3" class="quote" parent="1970_Correspondence" book="Let" index="546" link="Letter to Advaita -- Calcutta 7 October, 1970" link_text="Letter to Advaita -- Calcutta 7 October, 1970">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Advaita -- Calcutta 7 October, 1970|Letter to Advaita -- Calcutta 7 October, 1970]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">What are your demands? Or have you also been contaminated? Please tell me frankly. Where is your wife and child? If there is any disagreement with your Godbrothers, you may live separately. That doesn't matter. If there is any severe misunderstanding, I request you to come to India and live with me and start a press here.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1971_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="6" parent="Correspondence" text="1971 Correspondence"><h3>1971 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSudamaSurat1January1971_0" class="quote" parent="1971_Correspondence" book="Let" index="4" link="Letter to Sudama -- Surat 1 January, 1971" link_text="Letter to Sudama -- Surat 1 January, 1971">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sudama -- Surat 1 January, 1971|Letter to Sudama -- Surat 1 January, 1971]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Married life does not mean that there will be no disagreement between husband and wife—that is a custom from time immemorial. According to Vedic system, disagreement or quarrel between husband and wife should never be taken very seriously. The Vedic system therefore gives a concession for the wife to separate from her husband for some time and go to her father's house. So Cintamani may come to me for some time, but you cannot deviate from your responsibility in Japan.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGeraldISKCONAkashGangaBldg89BhulabhaiDesaiRoadBombay26India19thFebruary1971_1" class="quote" parent="1971_Correspondence" book="Let" index="72" link="Letter to Gerald -- ISKCON Akash Ganga Bldg; 89 Bhulabhai Desai Road; Bombay-26 India 19th February, 1971" link_text="Letter to Gerald -- ISKCON Akash Ganga Bldg; 89 Bhulabhai Desai Road; Bombay-26 India 19th February, 1971">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gerald -- ISKCON Akash Ganga Bldg; 89 Bhulabhai Desai Road; Bombay-26 India 19th February, 1971|Letter to Gerald -- ISKCON Akash Ganga Bldg; 89 Bhulabhai Desai Road; Bombay-26 India 19th February, 1971]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So the method of approaching God, bhaktiyoga or devotional service, and the supreme goal of life, pure love of Krsna, is the same message taught by Lord Jesus Christ as well as Krsna Himself.  The matter is very simple:  Lord Jesus is the faithful son of God and his Father God is Krsna, so there cannot be any disagreement between them.  Therefore the Father and Son are one, in agreement.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoRupanugaBhagavanSatsvarupaBombay15June1971_2" class="quote" parent="1971_Correspondence" book="Let" index="246" link="Letter to Rupanuga, Bhagavan, Satsvarupa -- Bombay 15 June, 1971" link_text="Letter to Rupanuga, Bhagavan, Satsvarupa -- Bombay 15 June, 1971">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Rupanuga, Bhagavan, Satsvarupa -- Bombay 15 June, 1971|Letter to Rupanuga, Bhagavan, Satsvarupa -- Bombay 15 June, 1971]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I think the book fund can maintain only 10% of the books produced. That will be economical. Otherwise, whatever GBC members decide, I have nothing to disagree with. But economically the existing proposal is not very sound. Books must be produced to the extent of $15,000 per month and then it is all right.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoCitsukhanandaNairobi12October1971_3" class="quote" parent="1971_Correspondence" book="Let" index="492" link="Letter to Citsukhananda -- Nairobi 12 October, 1971" link_text="Letter to Citsukhananda -- Nairobi 12 October, 1971">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Citsukhananda -- Nairobi 12 October, 1971|Letter to Citsukhananda -- Nairobi 12 October, 1971]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I am very glad to see that Candrabali and your son have returned to you again. It is very good. Husband and wife, there may be some disagreement but it should not be taken at any time very seriously. So combinedly together, go on with your preaching work.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoVrindaNairobi14October1971_4" class="quote" parent="1971_Correspondence" book="Let" index="498" link="Letter to Vrinda -- Nairobi 14 October, 1971" link_text="Letter to Vrinda -- Nairobi 14 October, 1971">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Vrinda -- Nairobi 14 October, 1971|Letter to Vrinda -- Nairobi 14 October, 1971]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I do not know why you disagreed with such a nice husband. If you take my advice, then you will immediately return to your husband and live there peacefully. You are a qualified girl. You can do extensive service to Krishna.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoVrindaNairobi14October1971_5" class="quote" parent="1971_Correspondence" book="Let" index="498" link="Letter to Vrinda -- Nairobi 14 October, 1971" link_text="Letter to Vrinda -- Nairobi 14 October, 1971">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Vrinda -- Nairobi 14 October, 1971|Letter to Vrinda -- Nairobi 14 October, 1971]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">If sometimes there are any disagreements, we should try to forget such incidences and be always in friendship with each other. So I hope you will immediately return to your husband and forget all these disagreements and fully cooperate for developing our Berlin center.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1972_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="7" parent="Correspondence" text="1972 Correspondence"><h3>1972 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoRanadhiraBombay5January1972_0" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="24" link="Letter to Ranadhira -- Bombay 5 January, 1972" link_text="Letter to Ranadhira -- Bombay 5 January, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Ranadhira -- Bombay 5 January, 1972|Letter to Ranadhira -- Bombay 5 January, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I can understand there is some disagreement with Hayagriva. From your letter the indication is like that. Under the circumstances, you may go with Kirtanananda Maharaja with his touring party.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAtreyaRsiBombay4February1972_1" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="71" link="Letter to Atreya Rsi -- Bombay 4 February, 1972" link_text="Letter to Atreya Rsi -- Bombay 4 February, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Atreya Rsi -- Bombay 4 February, 1972|Letter to Atreya Rsi -- Bombay 4 February, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So if there is sometimes slight disagreements between devotees, it is not due to impersonalism, but it is because they are persons, and such disagreements should not be taken very seriously. The devotee is always pessimistic about the material world, but he is very optimistic about the spiritual life; so in this way, you should consider that anyone engaged in Krishna's service is always the best person.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMissesSarnadaughtersLosAngeles19June1972_2" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="331" link="Letter to Misses Sarna daughters -- Los Angeles 19 June, 1972" link_text="Letter to Misses Sarna daughters -- Los Angeles 19 June, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Misses Sarna daughters -- Los Angeles 19 June, 1972|Letter to Misses Sarna daughters -- Los Angeles 19 June, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">That is Vedic civilization. Under the circumstances, I request you both to go back to your father immediately. If there is any disagreement, you can settle up personally, but you cannot disobey your father.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGargamuniMahamsaNaranarayaGirirajaLosAngeles19June1972_3" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="332" link="Letter to Gargamuni, Mahamsa, Naranaraya, Giriraja -- Los Angeles 19 June, 1972" link_text="Letter to Gargamuni, Mahamsa, Naranaraya, Giriraja -- Los Angeles 19 June, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gargamuni, Mahamsa, Naranaraya, Giriraja -- Los Angeles 19 June, 1972|Letter to Gargamuni, Mahamsa, Naranaraya, Giriraja -- Los Angeles 19 June, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Please help me in this ambition. If we can manage successfully, we will be attractive for the whole of India. Our task is very heavy, do not neglect by paltry disagreement. I hope Krishna will bless you to understand my heart and oblige.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoYadubaraLosAngeles20June1972_4" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="335" link="Letter to Yadubara -- Los Angeles 20 June, 1972" link_text="Letter to Yadubara -- Los Angeles 20 June, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Yadubara -- Los Angeles 20 June, 1972|Letter to Yadubara -- Los Angeles 20 June, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Today I have received one telephone call from Giriraja and he has informed me that there is some disagreement among you leaders there in our Bombay Center. This is not at all a pleasant situation for anyone. I am entrusting this huge task to all of you for working together cooperatively for doing something wonderful.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoYadubaraLosAngeles20June1972_5" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="335" link="Letter to Yadubara -- Los Angeles 20 June, 1972" link_text="Letter to Yadubara -- Los Angeles 20 June, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Yadubara -- Los Angeles 20 June, 1972|Letter to Yadubara -- Los Angeles 20 June, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Please help me in this ambition. If we can manage successfully, we will be attractive for the whole of India. Our task is very heavy, do not neglect by paltry disagreement. I hope Krishna will bless you to understand my heart and oblige.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoCyavanaLosAngeles28June1972_6" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="343" link="Letter to Cyavana -- Los Angeles 28 June, 1972" link_text="Letter to Cyavana -- Los Angeles 28 June, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Cyavana -- Los Angeles 28 June, 1972|Letter to Cyavana -- Los Angeles 28 June, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">If you are in disagreement at every point, how it will be possible to finish this important work? Anyway, please cooperate with Giriraja and the others, and if this is impossible then I will have to take other steps. If you want to go to Jaipur and Vrndavana for a little while, I have no objection, do it immediately.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGurudasaLondon1August1972_7" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="408" link="Letter to Gurudasa -- London 1 August, 1972" link_text="Letter to Gurudasa -- London 1 August, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gurudasa -- London 1 August, 1972|Letter to Gurudasa -- London 1 August, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">After I have discussed this matter thoroughly with Ksirodakasayi, I will let you know. But one thing is, why there should be disagreement between you? Our process is to work cooperatively, otherwise how the things will go on? And whether Acyutananda will stick there? If you and Acyutananda can manage, then there is no need of Ksirodakasayi coming there.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGaurasundaraLosAngeles26August1972_8" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="458" link="Letter to Gaurasundara -- Los Angeles 26 August, 1972" link_text="Letter to Gaurasundara -- Los Angeles 26 August, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gaurasundara -- Los Angeles 26 August, 1972|Letter to Gaurasundara -- Los Angeles 26 August, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">If one moment you are willing and the next moment there is some small disagreement and immediately you all go away, how can I be calm in my mind?</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSudeviLosAngeles15September1972_9" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="500" link="Letter to Sudevi -- Los Angeles 15 September, 1972" link_text="Letter to Sudevi -- Los Angeles 15 September, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sudevi -- Los Angeles 15 September, 1972|Letter to Sudevi -- Los Angeles 15 September, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Marriage between husband and wife means that the husband must forever be responsible for the wife's well-being and protection in all cases. That does not mean that now there is agreement between us, therefore I am responsible, but as soon as there is some disagreement then I immediately flee the scene and become so-called renounced. Whether your husband likes to take responsibility as your spiritual guide or not, that does not matter.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBhanutanyaHyderabad18November1972_10" class="quote" parent="1972_Correspondence" book="Let" index="582" link="Letter to Bhanutanya -- Hyderabad 18 November, 1972" link_text="Letter to Bhanutanya -- Hyderabad 18 November, 1972">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Bhanutanya -- Hyderabad 18 November, 1972|Letter to Bhanutanya -- Hyderabad 18 November, 1972]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Now if you have got the right idea how to do it, you may go there again and take some responsible post for correcting the situation, that will be your real duty, not that there is some disagreement and I go away disgusted, no. That is not Vaisnava standard.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1973_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="8" parent="Correspondence" text="1973 Correspondence"><h3>1973 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBhumataCalcutta10March1973_0" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="97" link="Letter to Bhumata -- Calcutta 10 March, 1973" link_text="Letter to Bhumata -- Calcutta 10 March, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Bhumata -- Calcutta 10 March, 1973|Letter to Bhumata -- Calcutta 10 March, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Because we are all individuals sometimes there is disagreement between devotees. When non-devotees quarrel they cannot stop and end up killing each other. But the devotees' disagreement does not last long because they patch it up for Krsna's sake, because they are all working for the same end—Krsna's service.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBabhruLosAngeles9December1973_1" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="329" link="Letter to Babhru -- Los Angeles 9 December, 1973" link_text="Letter to Babhru -- Los Angeles 9 December, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Babhru -- Los Angeles 9 December, 1973|Letter to Babhru -- Los Angeles 9 December, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Now, we have by Krsna's Grace built up something significant in the shape of this ISKCON and we are all one family. Sometimes there may be disagreement and quarrel but we should not go away. These inebrieties can be adjusted by the cooperative spirit, tolerance and maturity so I request you to kindly remain in the association of our devotees and work together.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoKirtananandaBombay18October1973_2" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="349" link="Letter to Kirtanananda -- Bombay 18 October, 1973" link_text="Letter to Kirtanananda -- Bombay 18 October, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Kirtanananda -- Bombay 18 October, 1973|Letter to Kirtanananda -- Bombay 18 October, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Material nature means dissension and disagreement, especially in this Kali yuga. But, for this Krsna consciousness movement its success will depend on agreement, even though there are varieties of engagements. In the material world there are varieties, but there is no agreement. In the spiritual world there are varieties, but there is agreement. That is the difference. The materialist without being able to adjust the varieties and the disagreements makes everything zero.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoTustaKrsnaNewDelhi7November1973_3" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="370" link="Letter to Tusta Krsna -- New Delhi 7 November, 1973" link_text="Letter to Tusta Krsna -- New Delhi 7 November, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Tusta Krsna -- New Delhi 7 November, 1973|Letter to Tusta Krsna -- New Delhi 7 November, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Please therefore all of you go to your respective positions and revive your devotional activities without any further delay, and if you cannot cope with the GBC men, which I suppose there must have been some disagreement, I shall deal with you directly. But, do not leave the Krsna consciousness movement, at any cost.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1974_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="9" parent="Correspondence" text="1974 Correspondence"><h3>1974 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSudamaVipraLosAngeles16July1974_0" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="274" link="Letter to Sudama Vipra -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974" link_text="Letter to Sudama Vipra -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sudama Vipra -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974|Letter to Sudama Vipra -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So let us cojointly work for the satisfaction of Krishna. So long I am living I wish you all be strictly under my guidance without any fratricidal disagreement. There is very good scope for preaching our cult all over the world, so let us do it cojointly.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoParvatiBombay27December1974_1" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="714" link="Letter to Parvati -- Bombay 27 December, 1974" link_text="Letter to Parvati -- Bombay 27 December, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Parvati -- Bombay 27 December, 1974|Letter to Parvati -- Bombay 27 December, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Even if it is very difficult and there may be many problems or disagreements still simply by remaining in the association of devotees and follow our regulative principles, chanting 16 rounds, rising early etc., you will become purified. If you leave the association of devotees to follow these regulative principles will be very difficult.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1975_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="10" parent="Correspondence" text="1975 Correspondence"><h3>1975 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAsitaBombay10January1975_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="37" link="Letter to Asita -- Bombay 10 January, 1975" link_text="Letter to Asita -- Bombay 10 January, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Asita -- Bombay 10 January, 1975|Letter to Asita -- Bombay 10 January, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">It is a big establishment and sometimes disagreement happens and I am helpless. I am enquiring from Mayapur why you were asked to leave there. If you want to take initiation from madhava Gosvami Maharaja I have no objection.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBhanutanyaTehran14March1975_1" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="158" link="Letter to Bhanutanya -- Tehran 14 March, 1975" link_text="Letter to Bhanutanya -- Tehran 14 March, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Bhanutanya -- Tehran 14 March, 1975|Letter to Bhanutanya -- Tehran 14 March, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">The fact that you have left our movement just on account of some minor disagreements shows that you are not actually serious about going back to home, back to Godhead.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMahajanaLosAngeles23June1975_2" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="356" link="Letter to Mahajana -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975" link_text="Letter to Mahajana -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Mahajana -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975|Letter to Mahajana -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Now I have given the guideline that 50% of a householder's income should be donated to the temple. If there is any disagreement, it may be taken up with Jayatirtha.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoCyavanaDallas29July1975_3" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="436" link="Letter to Cyavana -- Dallas 29 July, 1975" link_text="Letter to Cyavana -- Dallas 29 July, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Cyavana -- Dallas 29 July, 1975|Letter to Cyavana -- Dallas 29 July, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">They may have had some disagreement with you, but expert management means to engage all of the devotees and not allow them to split into different parties. Your action of sending a letter to the pleader has disturbed me. Why have you taken this rash action without consulting me or Brahmananda Maharaja? You should immediately withdraw that letter.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMrLongoAAliNairobi29October1975_4" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="627" link="Letter to Mr. Longo A. Ali -- Nairobi 29 October, 1975" link_text="Letter to Mr. Longo A. Ali -- Nairobi 29 October, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Mr. Longo A. Ali -- Nairobi 29 October, 1975|Letter to Mr. Longo A. Ali -- Nairobi 29 October, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I am glad to note your determination to be freed from the material entanglement by chanting Hare Krishna mantra. This is the recommended process for this age of disagreement for achieving Krishna consciousness.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1976_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="11" parent="Correspondence" text="1976 Correspondence"><h3>1976 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoRajaLaksmiMayapur17February1976_0" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="149" link="Letter to Raja Laksmi -- Mayapur 17 February, 1976" link_text="Letter to Raja Laksmi -- Mayapur 17 February, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Raja Laksmi -- Mayapur 17 February, 1976|Letter to Raja Laksmi -- Mayapur 17 February, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Let one live anywhere, but stick to the principles. Disagreements will continue in this material world. So one may live in a suitable place, but one must follow these five principles. My disciples must follow these principles living either in heaven or hell.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSrutakirtiMayapur14March1976_1" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="190" link="Letter to Srutakirti -- Mayapur 14 March, 1976" link_text="Letter to Srutakirti -- Mayapur 14 March, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Srutakirti -- Mayapur 14 March, 1976|Letter to Srutakirti -- Mayapur 14 March, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Boston is a very good city for there are many, many young people and a Hare Krishna Restaurant where we serve delicious Prasadam will be appreciated there. So there is some disagreement that you are having there in Hawaii so better that you immediately go to Boston and work with Ambarisa das to open another successful restaurant.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 11:40, 27 February 2010

Correspondence

1967 Correspondence

Letter to Krsna Devi -- Delhi 29 September, 1967:

Please know it that I do not approve anyone's separation who are married by me. If they disagree, they may live separately, but there cannot be divorce. When one is separate, one may fully devote in Krishna, but no more marriage. If this is not followed, I will not take part in anyone's marriage in the future. I hope you will understand me right and do the needful.

1968 Correspondence

Letter to Yamuna, Harsarani -- Los Angeles 15 January, 1968:

I can understand that in some points you disagree with Gargamuni but you have not clearly mentioned what is this point of disagreement. So far I know, Gargamuni's activities are approved by the president Jayananda, and so far I know Gargamuni, he has a business tactfulness, but his aim is to help the society financially. Whatever he does is not for his personal interest but for the interest of the society. If you have any specific grievance, please let me know, but don't be disturbed by any sort of disagreement with your God-brothers and sisters. Each and every living entity is an individual soul and as such disagreement is quite possible in our dealings with one another but we have to consider the central point of interest.

Letter to Harikrishnadas Aggarwal -- Los Angeles 3 March, 1968:

I have seen it that Swami Akhandananda worships Krishna in his apartment in Bombay. So we request everyone to worship Krishna and chant the Mantra, irrespectively, never mind whether one is a devotee, a fruitive worker, or a salvationist at the ultimate goal. We don't disagree with anyone, namely the Karmis, Jnanis, Yogis, etc, although we are devotees. We simply request everyone to worship Krishna as the Supreme Lord and join with us in this great movement of Krishna Consciousness!

Letter to Aniruddha -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968:

You are sinceremost servant of Krishna. I know that you have worked very good for Krishna. I think you should not be disturbed by minor disagreement. If you think that you cannot agree with Umapati, you can stop discussing with him, and if there is any point of judgment, you can refer to me. I am always at your service. So long we are individual souls, there must be disagreement also, because that is the symptom of individuality. But when such individual is surrendered unto Krishna, there should not be any disagreement.

Letter to Aniruddha -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968:

Therefore, I would advise that you should consult with Mukunda about this because he is very calm and coolheaded boy, and then decide whether to go to Santa Fe or not. I am writing separately to Mukunda also, as well as to Umapati in this connection, and I wish to know why there is disagreement. There cannot be any disagreement in discharge of duties in Krishna Consciousness

Letter to Mukunda -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968:

In the meantime, I have received another letter from Aniruddha that he is in disagreement with Umapati. I do now know what is the basis of this disagreement, but when you are there, I request you to see to the matter and try to mitigate their illusory disagreement. Even there is disagreement, the platform should be Krishna Consciousness, and in that platform if there is disagreement there is no inebriety.

Letter to Umapati -- Allston, Mass 30 May, 1968:

It is understood that Aniruddha and yourself are sometimes not in agreement in subjects concerning Krishna Consciousness. Of course, disagreements may be there, but there should not be dissension. I shall be glad to hear from you what is the point of dissension, and if it isn't very serious, I think you should ask Aniruddha not to be affected by such flimsy disagreement.

1969 Correspondence

Letter to Gurudasa, Yamuna -- Los Angeles 21 January, 1969:

To have some little disagreements amongst yourselves is not very unnatural because we are all individual beings. But as we are all working on behalf of Krishna we should always forget our personal interests and see to the prime cause.

Letter to Aniruddha -- Los Angeles 23 January, 1969:

I can understand from your letter that there has been some disagreements or misunderstandings in the temple, but I think that you should know that all such disturbances must be solved peacefully and with consideration of the entire situation. Cidananda is the president there, and I think you understand rightly that everyone must cooperate with him in keeping the temple nicely and without any unnecessary tensions.

Letter to Dayala Nitai -- Hawaii 23 March, 1969:

Amongst yourselves there should not be any disagreement. Whatever you do, you do it by joint consultation. Because our center of activities is Krishna, for Krishna's sake we can sacrifice our life, wealth, words, intelligence, everything. Of course, as individuals, we have sometimes disagreements, but that should be adjusted keeping our central attention to Krishna. So what is done is done; hence forward, you do everything jointly and we shall put out at least one issue of BTG French edition every month—even it may consist of one printed page only, still it must be published once monthly.

Letter to Krsna dasa -- San Francisco 3 April, 1969:

So competition, disagreement, or even dissension, if they are there, and the center is Krishna, such disagreement is not material. Even in Krishna Loka, there are rival parties of Srimati Radharani whose name is Candrabali, and there is competition between the two parties how to serve Krishna the best.

Letter to Sivananda -- New York 13 April, 1969:

You have mentioned about the disagreement amongst our god-brothers, and it is a fact. But so far as I am concerned, I am trying to execute my humble bit, and if somebody disagrees in these activities, what can I do? But so far I get their letters, they fully appreciate the work going on here, and I do not know who is the gentleman against these activities.

Letter to Vrndavanesvari -- Allston, Mass 26 April, 1969:

I think if you can start for Germany in the beginning of July, that will be very nice help. The boys who are working there are sometimes in disagreement, so if you go and take charge of the center, it will be a great service.

Letter to Gopala Krsna -- Columbus, Ohio 13 May, 1969:

But generally the wife is meant to follow wherever the husband goes. Most likely your wife would agree with you—she will not disagree to go. Rather, some girls will be very much encouraged to go to India with her husband. So you may consider on these points and inform me what you have decided.

Letter to Brahmananda -- Moundsville 31 May, 1969:

That is his policy and the reason he does not give straight answers. Once I talked with him, so I can understand his dealings. His disagreement with the design of TLC means that he wants to do this himself and charge. So I don't think we can trust this man.

Letter to Uttamasloka -- New Vrindaban 7 June, 1969:

As individuals there may be disagreement sometimes, but that is quite natural. Even in ordinary family affairs there is sometimes disagreement, but that does not mean immediately the disagreeing members shall leave the family. Similarly our Krishna Consciousness Movement means we are all gathering together in families of Krishna.

Letter to Laksmimoni -- Los Angeles 10 July, 1969:

In Krishna Consciousness marriages there is no question of any separation or divorce. Any disagreement between husband and wife is not taken very seriously, as much as a disagreement between children is not taken very seriously.

Letter to Brahmananda -- Hamburg 30 August, 1969:

Regarding Hayagriva and Satsvarupa, I think they can become joint editors, and articles to be published in BTG may be jointly decided upon. In case of disagreement the matter should be referred to me, and I shall give the final decision.

Letter to Brahmananda -- Hamburg 5 September, 1969:

I am just trying to hand over the whole management in the hands of my devotees, but if there is some disagreement in the management, then the whole thing may not go well. I think therefore, unless you all agree to open another branch in the East Coast, it should not be done.

Letter to Dinesh -- Tittenhurst 31 October, 1969:

Arjuna was a disciple of Krishna and Brahma was also a disciple of Krishna. Thus there is no disagreement between the conclusions of Brahma and Arjuna. Vyasadeva is in the disciplic succession of Brahma. The teachings to Arjuna was recorded by Vyasadeva verbatim. So according to the axiomatic truth, things equal to one another are equal to each other.

Letter to Balai -- London 15 November, 1969:

One thing you should know—of course, I know that you are so nice that there is no possibility amongst you for disagreement between husband and wife; but sometimes it happens—so you can let Saradia know that in our Krishna Consciousness household life there is no question of separation. Our marriage is Absolute. But if sometimes some disagreement is there, they may live separately for a few days, but that does not mean they can think of separation.

Letter to Aniruddha -- London 26 November, 1969:

The parents arrange for marriage and whatever boy or girl they select for their son or daughter, that is accepted. Even there is some disagreement at times, that is not taken very seriously. In this way, in mature life they become happy. I want to introduce this system in the Western countries, amongst my disciples at least.

Letter to Gopala Krsna -- London 26 November, 1969:

According to our Vedic civilization, disagreements between husband and wife is not taken very seriously. But the modern age allows divorce even, either by the husband or by the wife. These things are not good. But after marrying, certainly there will be some disagreement or misunderstanding between husband and wife. So consider all these points, and you can decide yourself.

1970 Correspondence

Letter to Sethji -- Los Angeles 13 January, 1970:

It is very nice and I have also mentioned it in the preface of my first volume of Srimad-Bhagavatam. Krishna Consciousness Movement is so nice that it can adjust the disagreement between socialism and capitalism. At the present moment, neither of these isms is perfect from the philosophical point of view, but if both parties take this common formula of Krishna Consciousness each one will supplement the other.

Letter to Bali-mardana, Upendra -- Los Angeles 10 May, 1970:

Kindly stop this unnecessary misunderstanding. Both Upendra and yourself are competent and experienced, so please adjust your disagreement amongst your selves. It is my request. As a matter of fact, as you are the pioneer in taking all risks to go to Australia, naturally you shall be considered as the leader, but a leader's position is also very grave and responsible. A leader has to lead others very tactfully and intelligently. Kindly therefore do not quarrel, but go on with your duties progressively.

Letter to Bali-mardana, Upendra -- Los Angeles 10 May, 1970:

We have to gather our strength by chanting the beads sixteen rounds regularly and praying to the lotus feet of Krsna for guidance.

I hope both of you will kindly follow my instruction and forget if there is any accidental disagreement.

Letter to Advaita -- Calcutta 7 October, 1970:

What are your demands? Or have you also been contaminated? Please tell me frankly. Where is your wife and child? If there is any disagreement with your Godbrothers, you may live separately. That doesn't matter. If there is any severe misunderstanding, I request you to come to India and live with me and start a press here.

1971 Correspondence

Letter to Sudama -- Surat 1 January, 1971:

Married life does not mean that there will be no disagreement between husband and wife—that is a custom from time immemorial. According to Vedic system, disagreement or quarrel between husband and wife should never be taken very seriously. The Vedic system therefore gives a concession for the wife to separate from her husband for some time and go to her father's house. So Cintamani may come to me for some time, but you cannot deviate from your responsibility in Japan.

Letter to Gerald -- ISKCON Akash Ganga Bldg; 89 Bhulabhai Desai Road; Bombay-26 India 19th February, 1971:

So the method of approaching God, bhaktiyoga or devotional service, and the supreme goal of life, pure love of Krsna, is the same message taught by Lord Jesus Christ as well as Krsna Himself. The matter is very simple: Lord Jesus is the faithful son of God and his Father God is Krsna, so there cannot be any disagreement between them. Therefore the Father and Son are one, in agreement.

Letter to Rupanuga, Bhagavan, Satsvarupa -- Bombay 15 June, 1971:

I think the book fund can maintain only 10% of the books produced. That will be economical. Otherwise, whatever GBC members decide, I have nothing to disagree with. But economically the existing proposal is not very sound. Books must be produced to the extent of $15,000 per month and then it is all right.

Letter to Citsukhananda -- Nairobi 12 October, 1971:

I am very glad to see that Candrabali and your son have returned to you again. It is very good. Husband and wife, there may be some disagreement but it should not be taken at any time very seriously. So combinedly together, go on with your preaching work.

Letter to Vrinda -- Nairobi 14 October, 1971:

I do not know why you disagreed with such a nice husband. If you take my advice, then you will immediately return to your husband and live there peacefully. You are a qualified girl. You can do extensive service to Krishna.

Letter to Vrinda -- Nairobi 14 October, 1971:

If sometimes there are any disagreements, we should try to forget such incidences and be always in friendship with each other. So I hope you will immediately return to your husband and forget all these disagreements and fully cooperate for developing our Berlin center.

1972 Correspondence

Letter to Ranadhira -- Bombay 5 January, 1972:

I can understand there is some disagreement with Hayagriva. From your letter the indication is like that. Under the circumstances, you may go with Kirtanananda Maharaja with his touring party.

Letter to Atreya Rsi -- Bombay 4 February, 1972:

So if there is sometimes slight disagreements between devotees, it is not due to impersonalism, but it is because they are persons, and such disagreements should not be taken very seriously. The devotee is always pessimistic about the material world, but he is very optimistic about the spiritual life; so in this way, you should consider that anyone engaged in Krishna's service is always the best person.

Letter to Misses Sarna daughters -- Los Angeles 19 June, 1972:

That is Vedic civilization. Under the circumstances, I request you both to go back to your father immediately. If there is any disagreement, you can settle up personally, but you cannot disobey your father.

Letter to Gargamuni, Mahamsa, Naranaraya, Giriraja -- Los Angeles 19 June, 1972:

Please help me in this ambition. If we can manage successfully, we will be attractive for the whole of India. Our task is very heavy, do not neglect by paltry disagreement. I hope Krishna will bless you to understand my heart and oblige.

Letter to Yadubara -- Los Angeles 20 June, 1972:

Today I have received one telephone call from Giriraja and he has informed me that there is some disagreement among you leaders there in our Bombay Center. This is not at all a pleasant situation for anyone. I am entrusting this huge task to all of you for working together cooperatively for doing something wonderful.

Letter to Yadubara -- Los Angeles 20 June, 1972:

Please help me in this ambition. If we can manage successfully, we will be attractive for the whole of India. Our task is very heavy, do not neglect by paltry disagreement. I hope Krishna will bless you to understand my heart and oblige.

Letter to Cyavana -- Los Angeles 28 June, 1972:

If you are in disagreement at every point, how it will be possible to finish this important work? Anyway, please cooperate with Giriraja and the others, and if this is impossible then I will have to take other steps. If you want to go to Jaipur and Vrndavana for a little while, I have no objection, do it immediately.

Letter to Gurudasa -- London 1 August, 1972:

After I have discussed this matter thoroughly with Ksirodakasayi, I will let you know. But one thing is, why there should be disagreement between you? Our process is to work cooperatively, otherwise how the things will go on? And whether Acyutananda will stick there? If you and Acyutananda can manage, then there is no need of Ksirodakasayi coming there.

Letter to Gaurasundara -- Los Angeles 26 August, 1972:

If one moment you are willing and the next moment there is some small disagreement and immediately you all go away, how can I be calm in my mind?

Letter to Sudevi -- Los Angeles 15 September, 1972:

Marriage between husband and wife means that the husband must forever be responsible for the wife's well-being and protection in all cases. That does not mean that now there is agreement between us, therefore I am responsible, but as soon as there is some disagreement then I immediately flee the scene and become so-called renounced. Whether your husband likes to take responsibility as your spiritual guide or not, that does not matter.

Letter to Bhanutanya -- Hyderabad 18 November, 1972:

Now if you have got the right idea how to do it, you may go there again and take some responsible post for correcting the situation, that will be your real duty, not that there is some disagreement and I go away disgusted, no. That is not Vaisnava standard.

1973 Correspondence

Letter to Bhumata -- Calcutta 10 March, 1973:

Because we are all individuals sometimes there is disagreement between devotees. When non-devotees quarrel they cannot stop and end up killing each other. But the devotees' disagreement does not last long because they patch it up for Krsna's sake, because they are all working for the same end—Krsna's service.

Letter to Babhru -- Los Angeles 9 December, 1973:

Now, we have by Krsna's Grace built up something significant in the shape of this ISKCON and we are all one family. Sometimes there may be disagreement and quarrel but we should not go away. These inebrieties can be adjusted by the cooperative spirit, tolerance and maturity so I request you to kindly remain in the association of our devotees and work together.

Letter to Kirtanananda -- Bombay 18 October, 1973:

Material nature means dissension and disagreement, especially in this Kali yuga. But, for this Krsna consciousness movement its success will depend on agreement, even though there are varieties of engagements. In the material world there are varieties, but there is no agreement. In the spiritual world there are varieties, but there is agreement. That is the difference. The materialist without being able to adjust the varieties and the disagreements makes everything zero.

Letter to Tusta Krsna -- New Delhi 7 November, 1973:

Please therefore all of you go to your respective positions and revive your devotional activities without any further delay, and if you cannot cope with the GBC men, which I suppose there must have been some disagreement, I shall deal with you directly. But, do not leave the Krsna consciousness movement, at any cost.

1974 Correspondence

Letter to Sudama Vipra -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974:

So let us cojointly work for the satisfaction of Krishna. So long I am living I wish you all be strictly under my guidance without any fratricidal disagreement. There is very good scope for preaching our cult all over the world, so let us do it cojointly.

Letter to Parvati -- Bombay 27 December, 1974:

Even if it is very difficult and there may be many problems or disagreements still simply by remaining in the association of devotees and follow our regulative principles, chanting 16 rounds, rising early etc., you will become purified. If you leave the association of devotees to follow these regulative principles will be very difficult.

1975 Correspondence

Letter to Asita -- Bombay 10 January, 1975:

It is a big establishment and sometimes disagreement happens and I am helpless. I am enquiring from Mayapur why you were asked to leave there. If you want to take initiation from madhava Gosvami Maharaja I have no objection.

Letter to Bhanutanya -- Tehran 14 March, 1975:

The fact that you have left our movement just on account of some minor disagreements shows that you are not actually serious about going back to home, back to Godhead.

Letter to Mahajana -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975:

Now I have given the guideline that 50% of a householder's income should be donated to the temple. If there is any disagreement, it may be taken up with Jayatirtha.

Letter to Cyavana -- Dallas 29 July, 1975:

They may have had some disagreement with you, but expert management means to engage all of the devotees and not allow them to split into different parties. Your action of sending a letter to the pleader has disturbed me. Why have you taken this rash action without consulting me or Brahmananda Maharaja? You should immediately withdraw that letter.

Letter to Mr. Longo A. Ali -- Nairobi 29 October, 1975:

I am glad to note your determination to be freed from the material entanglement by chanting Hare Krishna mantra. This is the recommended process for this age of disagreement for achieving Krishna consciousness.

1976 Correspondence

Letter to Raja Laksmi -- Mayapur 17 February, 1976:

Let one live anywhere, but stick to the principles. Disagreements will continue in this material world. So one may live in a suitable place, but one must follow these five principles. My disciples must follow these principles living either in heaven or hell.

Letter to Srutakirti -- Mayapur 14 March, 1976:

Boston is a very good city for there are many, many young people and a Hare Krishna Restaurant where we serve delicious Prasadam will be appreciated there. So there is some disagreement that you are having there in Hawaii so better that you immediately go to Boston and work with Ambarisa das to open another successful restaurant.