Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Could a woman be a temple president?: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Could a woman be a temple president"}}
{{terms|"Could a woman be a temple president"}}
{{notes|}}
{{notes|}}
 
{{compiler|Vrindi|MadhuGopaldas|Rishab}}
{{compiler|Vrindi}}
 
{{complete|ALL}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|20Dec08}}
{{first|20Dec08}}
 
{{last|25Apr12}}
{{last|20Dec08}}
 
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
{{toc right}}
 
[[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]]
[[Category:Women]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1975]]
 
[[Category:Questions On... Gender]]
[[Category:Temple President]]
[[Category:Questions On... ISKCON - Leadership and Management]]
 
[[Category:Questions From... Journalists, Reporters, Writers]]
== Conversations and Morning Walks ==
</div>
 
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
=== 1975 Conversations and Morning Walks ===
</div>
 
<div id="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="8" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1975 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1975 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
<span class="q_heading">''' Could a woman be a temple president?'''</span>
</div>
 
<div id="RoomConversationwithMrMrsWaxWriterandEditingManagerofPlayboyMagazineJuly51975Chicago_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="128" link="Room Conversation with Mr. &amp; Mrs. Wax, Writer and Editing Manager of Playboy Magazine -- July 5, 1975, Chicago" link_text="Room Conversation with Mr. &amp; Mrs. Wax, Writer and Editing Manager of Playboy Magazine -- July 5, 1975, Chicago">
<span class="CON-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:Room Conversation with Mr. & Mrs. Wax, Writer and Editing Manager of Playboy Magazine -- July 5, 1975, Chicago|Room Conversation with Mr. & Mrs. Wax, Writer and Editing Manager of Playboy Magazine -- July 5, 1975, Chicago]]:'''
<div class="heading">Yes, why not?
 
</div>
Prabhupāda: Anyone can become first-class. Woman can become first-class if she is chaste and very much attached to husband. And if the husband is first-class, she becomes first-class. Because woman's duty is to follow husband. So if the husband is first-class, the wife is first-class, if she sticks to the husband.
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation with Mr. &amp; Mrs. Wax, Writer and Editing Manager of Playboy Magazine -- July 5, 1975, Chicago|Room Conversation with Mr. &amp; Mrs. Wax, Writer and Editing Manager of Playboy Magazine -- July 5, 1975, Chicago]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: Anyone can become first-class. Woman can become first-class if she is chaste and very much attached to husband. And if the husband is first-class, she becomes first-class. Because woman's duty is to follow husband. So if the husband is first-class, the wife is first-class, if she sticks to the husband.</p>
 
<p>Mrs. Wax: But she can never be first-class unless she has a first class husband.</p>
Mrs. Wax: But she can never be first-class unless she has a first class husband.
<p>Prabhupāda: No, she is first class by following faithfully husband. And if the husband is first-class, then woman is first-class.</p>
 
<p>Mrs. Wax: Could a woman be a temple president?</p>
Prabhupāda: No, she is first class by following faithfully husband. And if the husband is first-class, then woman is first-class.
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes, why not?</p>
 
<p>Mrs. Wax: Glad to hear it.</p>
Mrs. Wax: Could a woman be a temple president?
<p>Prabhupāda: But because women are less intelligent, they should remain dependent on first-class father, first-class husband, and first-class son. Then she is first-class. That is the injunction. Woman should remain dependent in childhood upon first-class father, in youthhood upon first-class husband, and in old age upon first-class son. Woman is never independent. If she becomes independent, her life is not very good. She must agree to remain dependent on first-class father, first-class husband, and first-class son-three stages.</p>
 
</div>
Prabhupāda: Yes, why not?
</div>
 
</div>
Mrs. Wax: Glad to hear it.
 
Prabhupāda: But because women are less intelligent, they should remain dependent on first-class father, first-class husband, and first-class son. Then she is first-class. That is the injunction. Woman should remain dependent in childhood upon first-class father, in youthhood upon first-class husband, and in old age upon first-class son. Woman is never independent. If she becomes independent, her life is not very good. She must agree to remain dependent on first-class father, first-class husband, and first-class son-three stages.</span>

Latest revision as of 09:29, 25 April 2012

Expressions researched:
"Could a woman be a temple president"

Conversations and Morning Walks

1975 Conversations and Morning Walks

Yes, why not?
Room Conversation with Mr. & Mrs. Wax, Writer and Editing Manager of Playboy Magazine -- July 5, 1975, Chicago:

Prabhupāda: Anyone can become first-class. Woman can become first-class if she is chaste and very much attached to husband. And if the husband is first-class, she becomes first-class. Because woman's duty is to follow husband. So if the husband is first-class, the wife is first-class, if she sticks to the husband.

Mrs. Wax: But she can never be first-class unless she has a first class husband.

Prabhupāda: No, she is first class by following faithfully husband. And if the husband is first-class, then woman is first-class.

Mrs. Wax: Could a woman be a temple president?

Prabhupāda: Yes, why not?

Mrs. Wax: Glad to hear it.

Prabhupāda: But because women are less intelligent, they should remain dependent on first-class father, first-class husband, and first-class son. Then she is first-class. That is the injunction. Woman should remain dependent in childhood upon first-class father, in youthhood upon first-class husband, and in old age upon first-class son. Woman is never independent. If she becomes independent, her life is not very good. She must agree to remain dependent on first-class father, first-class husband, and first-class son-three stages.