Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Battlefield or no battlefield, wherever there is Krsna, that is transcendental. This has to be understood: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"battlefield or no battlefield, wherever there is Kṛṣṇa, that is transcendental. This has to be understood"}} {{notes|}}...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 10: Line 10:
{{total|1}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Battlefield]]
[[Category:Krsna on Different Battlefields]]
[[Category:Not]]
[[Category:Wherever]]
[[Category:Wherever]]
[[Category:There Is]]
[[Category:Krsna Is There]]
[[Category:Krsna]]
[[Category:That Is]]
[[Category:That Is]]
[[Category:Transcendental]]
[[Category:Krsna Is Transcendental]]
[[Category:This Is]]
[[Category:This Is]]
[[Category:To Be]]
[[Category:Understanding Krsna]]
[[Category:Understand]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1966 - 1977]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1976]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, Srimad-Bhagavatam]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - in India, Vrndavana]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="section">
<div id="section">
Line 32: Line 33:
</div>
</div>


<mp3player>https://vanipedia.s3.amazonaws.com/clip/760911SB-VRNDAVAN_clip.mp3</mp3player>
<div class="quote_link">
<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:760911 - Lecture SB 01.07.12 - Vrndavana|760911 - Lecture SB 01.07.12 - Vrndavana]]
[[Vanisource:760911 - Lecture SB 01.07.12 - Vrndavana|760911 - Lecture SB 01.07.12 - Vrndavana]]
</div>
</div>
<div class="text">
<div class="text">
This Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is another Purāṇa, history. We have already explained. So sometimes a class of devotees known as sahajiyā, they say that "What we have got to do with the narration of Kurukṣetra battle?" They immediately jump to the kṛṣṇa-līlā, directly with the gopīs. And Kṛṣṇa's activities in other field, they think it is useless. But that is not the fact. Anywhere Kṛṣṇa is acting, that is transcendental. The battlefield of Kurukṣetra, historical references, description, so superficially it appears that what a devotee has got to do with this battlefield? But battlefield or no battlefield, wherever there is Kṛṣṇa, that is transcendental. This has to be understood. Otherwise, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, why he should indulge in describing how Uttarā's pregnancy was saved by Kṛṣṇa, how the brahmāstra was thrown by Aśvatthāmā? So Śukadeva Gosvāmī is liberated person. Why he should indulge in these material things? No. Those who are advanced, they know that Kṛṣṇa's dancing with the gopīs, that līlā and Kṛṣṇa's playing as the leader of the battlefield of Kurukṣetra, is the same. It is all transcendental. One should not make any distinction between the two. Saṁsthāṁ ca pāṇḍu-putrāṇāṁ vakṣye kṛṣṇa-kathodayam. Pāṇḍu-putrāṇām, the pāṇḍu-putras, or the Pāṇḍavas, son of Pāṇḍu, they're all devotees. Even their political affairs, because there is connection with Kṛṣṇa, it is kṛṣṇa-kathā. Those who are with poor fund of knowledge...
This ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ''is another ''Purāṇa'', history. We have already explained. So sometimes a class of devotees known as ''sahajiyā'', they say that "What we have got to do with the narration of Kurukṣetra battle?" They immediately jump to the ''kṛṣṇa-līlā'', directly with the ''gopīs''. And Kṛṣṇa's activities in other field, they think it is useless. But that is not the fact. Anywhere Kṛṣṇa is acting, that is transcendental. The battlefield of Kurukṣetra, historical references, description, so superficially it appears that what a devotee has got to do with this battlefield? But battlefield or no battlefield, wherever there is Kṛṣṇa, that is transcendental. This has to be understood. Otherwise, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, why he should indulge in describing how Uttarā's pregnancy was saved by Kṛṣṇa, how the ''brahmāstra ''was thrown by Aśvatthāmā? So Śukadeva Gosvāmī is liberated person. Why he should indulge in these material things? No. Those who are advanced, they know that Kṛṣṇa's dancing with the ''gopīs'', that ''līlā ''and Kṛṣṇa's playing as the leader of the battlefield of Kurukṣetra, is the same. It is all transcendental. One should not make any distinction between the two. ''Saṁsthāṁ ca pāṇḍu-putrāṇāṁ vakṣye kṛṣṇa-kathodayam''. ''Pāṇḍu-putrāṇām'', the ''pāṇḍu-putras'', or the Pāṇḍavas, son of Pāṇḍu, they're all devotees. Even their political affairs, because there is connection with Kṛṣṇa, it is ''kṛṣṇa-kathā''.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 06:10, 21 July 2021

Expressions researched:
"battlefield or no battlefield, wherever there is Kṛṣṇa, that is transcendental. This has to be understood"

Lectures

Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures

The battlefield of Kurukṣetra, historical references, description, so superficially it appears that what a devotee has got to do with this battlefield? But battlefield or no battlefield, wherever there is Kṛṣṇa, that is transcendental. This has to be understood.


This Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is another Purāṇa, history. We have already explained. So sometimes a class of devotees known as sahajiyā, they say that "What we have got to do with the narration of Kurukṣetra battle?" They immediately jump to the kṛṣṇa-līlā, directly with the gopīs. And Kṛṣṇa's activities in other field, they think it is useless. But that is not the fact. Anywhere Kṛṣṇa is acting, that is transcendental. The battlefield of Kurukṣetra, historical references, description, so superficially it appears that what a devotee has got to do with this battlefield? But battlefield or no battlefield, wherever there is Kṛṣṇa, that is transcendental. This has to be understood. Otherwise, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, why he should indulge in describing how Uttarā's pregnancy was saved by Kṛṣṇa, how the brahmāstra was thrown by Aśvatthāmā? So Śukadeva Gosvāmī is liberated person. Why he should indulge in these material things? No. Those who are advanced, they know that Kṛṣṇa's dancing with the gopīs, that līlā and Kṛṣṇa's playing as the leader of the battlefield of Kurukṣetra, is the same. It is all transcendental. One should not make any distinction between the two. Saṁsthāṁ ca pāṇḍu-putrāṇāṁ vakṣye kṛṣṇa-kathodayam. Pāṇḍu-putrāṇām, the pāṇḍu-putras, or the Pāṇḍavas, son of Pāṇḍu, they're all devotees. Even their political affairs, because there is connection with Kṛṣṇa, it is kṛṣṇa-kathā.