Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Authoritative picture of the hand symbols: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"authoritative picture of the hand symbols"}}
{{terms|"authoritative picture of the hand symbols"}}


Line 21: Line 23:
[[Category:Picture]]
[[Category:Picture]]


[[Category:Hand]]
[[Category:Hand of God]]


[[Category:Symbol]]
[[Category:Symbol]]
</div>


== Correspondence ==
<div class="section" id="Correspondence" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2></div>


=== 1971 Correspondence ===
<div class="sub_section" id="1971_Correspondence" text="1971 Correspondence"><h3>1971 Correspondence</h3></div>


<span class="q_heading">'''In reply to your question whether TLC or the original cover of Srimad-Bhagavatam gives the authoritative picture of the hand symbols, what is written in TLC is correct.'''</span>
<div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 31 December, 1971" link_text="Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 31 December, 1971">
<div class="heading">In reply to your question whether TLC or the original cover of Srimad-Bhagavatam gives the authoritative picture of the hand symbols, what is written in TLC is correct.</div>


<span class="LET-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 31 December, 1971|Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 31 December, 1971]]:''' In reply to your question whether TLC or the original cover of Srimad-Bhagavatam gives the authoritative picture of the hand symbols, what is written in TLC is correct. On page 69 of TLC first there is a description of the symbols for Vasudeva, Sankarsana, Pradyumna, and Aniruddha. Then follows a description of the representations of Narayana. Although there should be twenty, only eighteen are given. The two who are missing are Sri Kesava who is represented holding from the lower right hand lotus, conch, disk, club; and Sri Vamana holding conch, disk, club, and lotus flower. So altogether this makes twenty-four. The twenty-two as they are written in TLC are correct.</span>
<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 31 December, 1971|Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 31 December, 1971]]:''' In reply to your question whether TLC or the original cover of Srimad-Bhagavatam gives the authoritative picture of the hand symbols, what is written in TLC is correct. On page 69 of TLC first there is a description of the symbols for Vasudeva, Sankarsana, Pradyumna, and Aniruddha. Then follows a description of the representations of Narayana. Although there should be twenty, only eighteen are given. The two who are missing are Sri Kesava who is represented holding from the lower right hand lotus, conch, disk, club; and Sri Vamana holding conch, disk, club, and lotus flower. So altogether this makes twenty-four. The twenty-two as they are written in TLC are correct.</div>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 13:11, 30 June 2012

Expressions researched:
"authoritative picture of the hand symbols"

Correspondence

1971 Correspondence

In reply to your question whether TLC or the original cover of Srimad-Bhagavatam gives the authoritative picture of the hand symbols, what is written in TLC is correct.
Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 31 December, 1971: In reply to your question whether TLC or the original cover of Srimad-Bhagavatam gives the authoritative picture of the hand symbols, what is written in TLC is correct. On page 69 of TLC first there is a description of the symbols for Vasudeva, Sankarsana, Pradyumna, and Aniruddha. Then follows a description of the representations of Narayana. Although there should be twenty, only eighteen are given. The two who are missing are Sri Kesava who is represented holding from the lower right hand lotus, conch, disk, club; and Sri Vamana holding conch, disk, club, and lotus flower. So altogether this makes twenty-four. The twenty-two as they are written in TLC are correct.