Regarding Prayag Devi Dasi, yes, a woman requires protection. But normally we regard that any unmarried woman with children should take security of the temple—that is more secure than the protection of Krishna—and be satisfied with her children. Marriage is simply a license for having sex, so we are not very fond of sanctioning unnecessary sense gratification. However in this case, if you think the match is favorable for their advancing nicely in Krishna Consciousness, then I shall agree with your judgement. One thing is, there should be a formal contract signed by both parties at each marriage, voting that there will be no separation and that man and wife will work cooperatively in Krishna Consciousness.
Marriage is simply a license for having sex, so we are not very fond of sanctioning unnecessary sense gratification
Expressions researched:
"Marriage is simply a license for having sex, so we are not very fond of sanctioning unnecessary sense gratification"
Correspondence
1971 Correspondence
Marriage is simply a license for having sex, so we are not very fond of sanctioning unnecessary sense gratification. However in this case, if you think the match is favorable for their advancing nicely in Krishna Consciousness, then I shall agree with your judgement.
Letter to Sridama -- Delhi 17 November, 1971: Page Title: | Marriage is simply a license for having sex, so we are not very fond of sanctioning unnecessary sense gratification |
Compiler: | Rishab |
Created: | 20 of Oct, 2011 |
Totals by Section: | BG=0, SB=0, CC=0, OB=0, Lec=0, Con=0, Let=1 |
No. of Quotes: | 1 |