Please accept my blessings. I beg to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated October 22, 1969. I have duly made corrections on the Isopanisad glossary you had enclosed, and I shall send it to Brahmananda as requested by you. I want that in all of our books, magazines and other writings the scholarly presentation be given in all instances, so for every Sanskrit word there must be the appropriate spelling and diacritic marks. Regarding your question about BTG containing more than one essay by me in certain issues, you may use your own judgement in this connection. Enclosed is a tape for Krsna, and at the part on this tape where Kamsa is killed, that is the end of the first volume of Krsna. The remaining portion shall be published as the second volume. Now we must make arrangements for its publication. Please consult with Advaita as to the price for 10,000 copies on the style of TLC. There will be approximately 350 printed pages and 50 pages of paintings. So combinedly you determine what the production costs will be and let me know your figures. Regarding your final question, you are correct that Garbhodakasayi Visnu and Karanodakasayi Visnu are not divisions of Paramatma. So you may change the words "divided into" into "is one of". I am so pleased to learn that already the press is ready to begin printing some Krsna Consciousness booklet, and please keep me informed on your progress.
Regarding your final question, I thought that Garbhodakasayi Visnu and Karanodakasayi Visnu are not divisions of Paramatma?: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Regarding your final question"|"that Garbhodakasayi Visnu and Karanodakasayi Visnu are not divisions of Paramatma"}} {{notes|}} {…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{terms|"Regarding your final question"|"that Garbhodakasayi Visnu and Karanodakasayi Visnu are not divisions of Paramatma"}} | {{terms|"Regarding your final question"|"that Garbhodakasayi Visnu and Karanodakasayi Visnu are not divisions of Paramatma"}} | ||
{{notes|}} | {{notes|}} | ||
{{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} | {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas|Rishab}} | ||
{{complete|ALL}} | {{complete|ALL}} | ||
{{first|05Jan12}} | {{first|05Jan12}} | ||
{{last| | {{last|11Jan13}} | ||
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=1}} | {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=1}} | ||
{{total|1}} | {{total|1}} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]] | [[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]] | ||
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1969]] | [[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1969]] | ||
[[Category:Questions | [[Category:Questions On... Supersoul, Paramatma]] | ||
[[Category:Questions On... Krsna, His Expansions, Associates, Paraphernalia]] | |||
[[Category:Questions | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2> | <div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 14 January 2013
Expressions researched:
"Regarding your final question"
|"that Garbhodakasayi Visnu and Karanodakasayi Visnu are not divisions of Paramatma"
Correspondence
1969 Correspondence
Regarding your final question, you are correct that Garbhodakasayi Visnu and Karanodakasayi Visnu are not divisions of Paramatma. So you may change the words "divided into" into "is one of".
Letter to Satsvarupa -- Tittenhurst 26 October, 1969: