Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Have these books been reviewed in foreign papers?: Difference between revisions

(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Have these books been reviewed in foreign papers"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|SunitaS}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|17Aug11}} {{last|17A…')
 
(Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
{{terms|"Have these books been reviewed in foreign papers"}}
{{terms|"Have these books been reviewed in foreign papers"}}
{{notes|}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|SunitaS}}
{{compiler|SunitaS|Rishab}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|17Aug11}}
{{first|17Aug11}}
{{last|17Aug11}}
{{last|02Jul12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{total|1}}
Line 12: Line 12:
[[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]]
[[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1976]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1976]]
[[Category:Questions On... Prabhupada's Books, BBT and BTG]]
[[Category:Questions On... Publicity, Public Relations, Public Press]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
Line 21: Line 23:
</div>
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation -- December 29, 1976, Bombay|Room Conversation -- December 29, 1976, Bombay]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Guest (3): Have you tried to compare with Gītā written by Gyaneshvara, or by Vinoba Bhave or by somebody else?</p>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation -- December 29, 1976, Bombay|Room Conversation -- December 29, 1976, Bombay]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Guest (3): Have you tried to compare with Gītā written by Gyaneshvara, or by Vinoba Bhave or by somebody else?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: According to Bhagavad-gītā, if you don't follow the instruction of Bhagavad-gītā, you may be very learned scholar, whatever you write, it is lost. We follow that principle. As stated in the Bhagavad-gītā, evaṁ paramparā-prāptam imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 4.2|BG 4.2]]). Find out this Fourth Chapter.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: According to Bhagavad-gītā, if you don't follow the instruction of Bhagavad-gītā, you may be very learned scholar, whatever you write, it is lost. We follow that principle. As stated in the Bhagavad-gītā, evaṁ paramparā-prāptam imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 4.2 (1972)|BG 4.2]]). Find out this Fourth Chapter.</p>
<p>Guest (2): Have these books been reviewed in foreign papers?</p>
<p>Guest (2): Have these books been reviewed in foreign papers?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: It is very widely read.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: It is very widely read.</p>
Line 29: Line 31:
:sa kāleneha mahatā
:sa kāleneha mahatā
:yogo naṣṭaḥ parantapa
:yogo naṣṭaḥ parantapa
:([[Vanisource:BG 4.2|BG 4.2]])
:([[Vanisource:BG 4.2 (1972)|BG 4.2]])
<p>Prabhupāda: Kṛṣṇa says that this Bhagavad-gītā has to be received by the disciplic succession. And sa kālena yogo naṣṭaḥ parantapa. Because that disciplic succession is now broken, that yoga system is now lost. So all these interpreters, they are interpreting in their own way. Therefore it is lost. So there is no use of consulting this lost version.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Kṛṣṇa says that this Bhagavad-gītā has to be received by the disciplic succession. And sa kālena yogo naṣṭaḥ parantapa. Because that disciplic succession is now broken, that yoga system is now lost. So all these interpreters, they are interpreting in their own way. Therefore it is lost. So there is no use of consulting this lost version.</p>
<p>Guest (3): So you just give it as it is.</p>
<p>Guest (3): So you just give it as it is.</p>

Latest revision as of 03:46, 17 May 2018

Expressions researched:
"Have these books been reviewed in foreign papers"

Conversations and Morning Walks

1976 Conversations and Morning Walks

It is very widely read.
Room Conversation -- December 29, 1976, Bombay:

Guest (3): Have you tried to compare with Gītā written by Gyaneshvara, or by Vinoba Bhave or by somebody else?

Prabhupāda: According to Bhagavad-gītā, if you don't follow the instruction of Bhagavad-gītā, you may be very learned scholar, whatever you write, it is lost. We follow that principle. As stated in the Bhagavad-gītā, evaṁ paramparā-prāptam imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ (BG 4.2). Find out this Fourth Chapter.

Guest (2): Have these books been reviewed in foreign papers?

Prabhupāda: It is very widely read.

Gopāla Kṛṣṇa: For example, in the Fourth Chapter Lord Kṛṣṇa says,

evaṁ paramparā-prāptam
imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ
sa kāleneha mahatā
yogo naṣṭaḥ parantapa
(BG 4.2)

Prabhupāda: Kṛṣṇa says that this Bhagavad-gītā has to be received by the disciplic succession. And sa kālena yogo naṣṭaḥ parantapa. Because that disciplic succession is now broken, that yoga system is now lost. So all these interpreters, they are interpreting in their own way. Therefore it is lost. So there is no use of consulting this lost version.

Guest (3): So you just give it as it is.

Prabhupāda: That is... Therefore my Bhagavad-gītā is named Bhagavad-gītā As It Is. No interpretation.

Gopāla Kṛṣṇa: Each word is the original Sanskrit śloka, English transliteration, word by word meaning, so there's no room for manipulation. There's a translation and purport. Every book that Śrīla Prabhupāda has written has the same format and each book is illustrated.

Guest (3): Do you believe that the Gītā should be followed as it is or interpretation...

Prabhupāda: Yes, yes. If you read somebody's book, you must read the author's version. Why should you bring interpretation? This is... You have no business. If you want to say something of your philosophy, you can say, but why do you take Bhagavad-gītā and give your own interpretation? That is very bad.