Considering to be God: Difference between revisions
Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) (Created page with "^ Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes Category:Wanted Categories - Vaniquotes") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:God - Umbrella Category | [[Category:Consider]] | ||
[[Category:Considered To Be...]] | |||
[[Category:Becoming God]] | |||
[[Category:God - Umbrella Category]] | |||
[[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | [[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:52, 22 October 2024
Pages in category "Considering to be God"
The following 8 pages are in this category, out of 8 total.
I
- If vedo narayanah saksat, if Vedas are to be considered as Narayana directly, then Krsna is accepted by the acaryas as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. That is a conclusion of the Vedas also
- Indeed, one falls down again onto the material platform because considering oneself the Supreme Person, the Supreme Absolute Truth, is offensive
T
- The leaders of the world may be famous for a few years only, but Lord Sri Krsna appeared 5,000 years ago and is still being worshiped. So one who possesses all six of these opulences in completeness is considered to be God
- The philosophers known as kevaladvaita-vadis generally occupy themselves with hearing the Sariraka-bhasya, a commentary by Sankaracarya advocating that one impersonally consider oneself the Supreme Lord
- The story of King Paundraka is very interesting because it proves that there have always been many rascals and fools who have considered themselves God