Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


The self-evident Vedic literatures are the highest evidence of all, but if these literatures are interpreted, their self-evident nature is lost: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The self-evident Vedic literatures are the highest evidence of all, but if these literatures are interpreted, their self-evide...")
 
(Removed from deleted category 'But')
 
Line 12: Line 12:
[[Category:Self-evident]]
[[Category:Self-evident]]
[[Category:Vedic Literature]]
[[Category:Vedic Literature]]
[[Category:Are]]
[[Category:Highest]]
[[Category:Highest]]
[[Category:Vedic Evidence]]
[[Category:Vedic Evidence]]
[[Category:But]]
[[Category:These]]
[[Category:These]]
[[Category:Interpretation]]
[[Category:Interpretation]]
Line 22: Line 20:
[[Category:Lost]]
[[Category:Lost]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila Chapter 07 - Lord Caitanya in Five Features]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila Chapter 07 - Lord Caitanya in Five Features]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - 62 Chapters]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Adi-lila 17 Chapters]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="section">
<div id="section">

Latest revision as of 11:22, 3 March 2021

Expressions researched:
"The self-evident Vedic literatures are the highest evidence of all, but if these literatures are interpreted, their self-evident nature is lost"

Sri Caitanya-caritamrta

CC Adi-lila

The self-evident Vedic literatures are the highest evidence of all, but if these literatures are interpreted, their self-evident nature is lost.

The self-evident Vedic literatures are the highest evidence of all, but if these literatures are interpreted, their self-evident nature is lost.

We quote Vedic evidence to support our statements, but if we interpret it according to our own judgment, the authority of the Vedic literature is rendered imperfect or useless. In other words, by interpreting the Vedic version one minimizes the value of Vedic evidence. When one quotes from Vedic literature, it is understood that the quotations are authoritative. How can one bring the authority under his own control? That is a case of principiis obsta.