Impudence (Letters): Difference between revisions
Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(Change of category of page from Letters, Conversations and Lectures to Compilations from Letters, Conversations or Lectures) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div id="compilation"> | |||
<div id="facts"> | |||
{{terms|impudence | impudences | impudency | impudent | impudently }} | {{terms|impudence | impudences | impudency | impudent | impudently }} | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
[[Category:Impudence|1]] | [[Category:Impudence|1]] | ||
[[Category:Letters]] | [[Category:Compilations from Letters]] | ||
</div> | |||
== Correspondence = | <div class="section" id="Correspondence" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2></div> | ||
=== 1968 Correspondence | <div class="sub_section" id="1968_Correspondence" text="1968 Correspondence"><h3>1968 Correspondence</h3></div> | ||
< | <div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Brahmananda -- Los Angeles 2 November, 1968" link_text="Letter to Brahmananda -- Los Angeles 2 November, 1968"> | ||
<div class="heading">This Parvat is one of the disciples of my God-brother but he is so salient that he has not replied to my letters, but, instead of replying my letter, he has the impudency of writing to Rayarama.</div> | |||
< | <div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Brahmananda -- Los Angeles 2 November, 1968|Letter to Brahmananda -- Los Angeles 2 November, 1968]]:''' I wrote one letter jointly addressed to Acyutananda and Jaya Govinda but they have not replied the same. I think as Bon Maharaja poisoned the mind of Hrsikesa, similarly these boys have been entrapped by Parvat. This Parvat is one of the disciples of my God-brother but he is so salient that he has not replied to my letters, but, instead of replying my letter, he has the impudency of writing to Rayarama. Rayarama may not reply this letter until I have seen it. He appears to be as venomous as Bon Maharaja. They are all envious of my activities here. As Jaya Govinda has not yet left for Bombay, there is no need of issuing indemnity letter in his favor. I do not understand why he has requested to address the indemnity letter to Parvat Maharaja. These are very doubtful things. I do not know how to deal with these boys. Both of them are silent about my letter of Oct. 13, 1968 which I wrote them about realizing the money from Hitsaran. I am really very sorry for them. I am enclosing the copy of the above mentioned letter.</div> | ||
</div> | |||
=== 1970 Correspondence | <div class="sub_section" id="1970_Correspondence" text="1970 Correspondence"><h3>1970 Correspondence</h3></div> | ||
< | <div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Jayadvaita -- Los Angeles 30 January, 1970" link_text="Letter to Jayadvaita -- Los Angeles 30 January, 1970"> | ||
<div class="heading">Simply add commas after the preceeding symptoms namely "prestige'' and "impudence'' respectively.</div> | |||
< | <div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Jayadvaita -- Los Angeles 30 January, 1970|Letter to Jayadvaita -- Los Angeles 30 January, 1970]]:''' Regarding your second question, Byabhaichary, you have got 31 only out of 33. I think some of the brackets are not counted. So if the parentheses are removed from "intoxication'' and "impotency'' and they are also counted, the total of symptoms will come to 33. Simply add commas after the preceeding symptoms namely "prestige'' and "impudence'' respectively.</div> | ||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:25, 1 November 2009
Correspondence
1968 Correspondence
This Parvat is one of the disciples of my God-brother but he is so salient that he has not replied to my letters, but, instead of replying my letter, he has the impudency of writing to Rayarama.
Letter to Brahmananda -- Los Angeles 2 November, 1968: I wrote one letter jointly addressed to Acyutananda and Jaya Govinda but they have not replied the same. I think as Bon Maharaja poisoned the mind of Hrsikesa, similarly these boys have been entrapped by Parvat. This Parvat is one of the disciples of my God-brother but he is so salient that he has not replied to my letters, but, instead of replying my letter, he has the impudency of writing to Rayarama. Rayarama may not reply this letter until I have seen it. He appears to be as venomous as Bon Maharaja. They are all envious of my activities here. As Jaya Govinda has not yet left for Bombay, there is no need of issuing indemnity letter in his favor. I do not understand why he has requested to address the indemnity letter to Parvat Maharaja. These are very doubtful things. I do not know how to deal with these boys. Both of them are silent about my letter of Oct. 13, 1968 which I wrote them about realizing the money from Hitsaran. I am really very sorry for them. I am enclosing the copy of the above mentioned letter.
1970 Correspondence
Simply add commas after the preceeding symptoms namely "prestige and "impudence respectively.
Letter to Jayadvaita -- Los Angeles 30 January, 1970: Regarding your second question, Byabhaichary, you have got 31 only out of 33. I think some of the brackets are not counted. So if the parentheses are removed from "intoxication and "impotency and they are also counted, the total of symptoms will come to 33. Simply add commas after the preceeding symptoms namely "prestige and "impudence respectively.