Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Without interpretation (Letters)

Revision as of 12:25, 27 February 2012 by Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) (Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Not by interpretation"|"Not that interpreting"|"no interpretation"|"not allowed interpretation"|"not be interpreted"|"not by inte…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Expressions researched:
"Not by interpretation" |"Not that interpreting" |"no interpretation" |"not allowed interpretation" |"not be interpreted" |"not by interpreting" |"not create interpretations" |"not create interpretations" |"not foolishly interpret" |"not interpret" |"not interpretation" |"not interpreted" |"not interpreting" |"not my interpretation" |"not to interpret" |"not unnecessarily interpret" |"without a wrong interpretation" |"without any false interpretation" |"without any foolish interpretation" |"without any interpretation" |"without any nonsense interpretation" |"without any nonsensical interpretation" |"without any speculation, or interpretation" |"without any unnecessary interpretation" |"without any wishful interpretation" |"without any wrong interpretation" |"without having fashionable interpretation" |"without interpretation" |"without interpretation" |"without manufacturing rubbish interpretations" |"without motivated interpretation" |"without mundane interpretation" |"without my interpretation"

Notes from the compiler: VedaBase query: "without * interpretation*" or "no interpretation" or "without interpretation*" or "without * * interpretation*" or "not interpret*" or "without * * * interpretation*" or "not * interpret*"

Correspondence

1947 to 1965 Correspondence

Letter to Mr. Bailey -- Allahabad 2 October, 1951:

I am in due receipt of your letter No. AR-2732 of the 26th ultimo, and I am very glad to note your frankness to admit that you cannot go so far at present to disseminate the basic principles of Indian philosophies.

Indian philosophies mean generally the Sada Darsana or the six different schools of philosophers namely, 1. the Mimamsa, 2. Sankhya, 3. Nyaya, 4. Mayavada, 5. Patanjal and 6. the Vedanta.

The last named Vedanta Darsana was compiled by Sri Vyasa after a thorough refutation of all other five Darsanas and therefore Vedanta is accepted by all Indian scholars and no body is recognized as bona fide who has no interpretation of this Vedanta Darsana.

The Western philosophers mostly of the Sankhya school have less aquaintance with the Vedanta Darsana and philosophers like Kant, Mill, Aristotle or Schopenhauer etc all belong to either of the above five Darsanas except Vedanta because limited human thinking power cannot go beyond that stage. But Vedanta Darsana is far beyond the limited mental speculation of the human brain conditioned by material nature. Unfortunately Sankara who belonged to the Mayavada school made a misinterpretation of the Vedanta for his own purpose to convert the Buddhists in India.

Page Title:Without interpretation (Letters)
Compiler:Visnu Murti
Created:27 of Feb, 2012
Totals by Section:BG=0, SB=0, CC=0, OB=0, Lec=0, Con=0, Let=9
No. of Quotes:9