Those who desire to eat meat may satisfy the demands of their tongues by eating lower animals, but they should never kill cows

Expressions researched:
"non-important animals"

Conversations and Morning Walks

1974 Conversations and Morning Walks

Those who are meat-eaters, they can eat other non-important animals, but cows must be saved.

Room Conversation with Scientists -- July 2, 1974, Melbourne:

Prabhupada: Cow protection means you get the milk, sufficient quantity, and from milk you get so many nutritious, full of vitamin food.

Dr. Harrap: It's a complete food in itself.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Those who are meat-eaters, they can eat other non-important animals, but cows must be saved, even from economic point of view. Here it is said that go-rakṣya. It does not say, Kṛṣṇa, "elephant-rakṣya." Elephant is a big animal, and at least fifty times more than cow, there is flesh. But it is not recommended. But the cow protection is recommended because it has got the miracle food, milk, and from milk you can prepare hundreds of preparation, all nutritious, full of vitamin A and D. So therefore it is recommended, go-rakṣya. It is not that meat-eating is stopped. Meat-eaters may kill other non-important animals but don't kill animal, er, cow. And besides that, from moral point of view, we are drinking milk from the cow, so she is mother.