The revision #1169720 of the page named "There is no use of interpretation. Interpretation is required when you cannot understand one statement. In the law court if one statement is ambiguous then two parties argue on it. "I think it is this," "I think" does not exist.
This is usually caused by following an outdated history link to a page that has been deleted. Details can be found in the deletion log.
| Page Title: | There is no use of interpretation. Interpretation is required when you cannot understand one statement. In the law court if one statement is ambiguous then two parties argue on it. "I think it is this," "I think |
| Compiler: | Krsnadas, Rishab |
| Created: | 21 of Dec, 2011 |
| Totals by Section: | BG=0, SB=0, CC=0, OB=0, Lec=1, Con=0, Let=0 |
| No. of Quotes: | 1 |