User contributions for Purnamasi
5 May 2024
- 13:4513:45, 5 May 2024 diff hist +32 Lord Siva has a Vaisnava sampradaya, the disciplic succession known as the Rudra-sampradaya. Just as there is a Brahma-sampradaya coming directly from Lord Brahma, the Rudra-sampradaya comes directly from Lord Siva No edit summary current
- 13:1313:13, 5 May 2024 diff hist +32 Lord Siva also has a sampradaya party, known as the Rudra-sampradaya, and they are also known as Vaisnavas No edit summary current
- 13:0913:09, 5 May 2024 diff hist +32 Lord Rudra, or Lord Siva, is the original acarya of the Vaisnava sampradaya called the Rudra-sampradaya. Rudra-gitena indicates that under the disciplic succession of Lord Rudra, the Pracetas achieved spiritual success No edit summary current
- 13:0713:07, 5 May 2024 diff hist +32 Lord Brahma is bhrtya, a servant of Krsna, and he is adi-kavi, the original creator of this universe (SB 1.1.1). Nonetheless, even he could not obtain such mercy as mother Yasoda. As for Lord Siva, he is the topmost Vaisnava No edit summary current
- 13:0413:04, 5 May 2024 diff hist +32 In this verse (SB 4.6.37) it is specifically mentioned that he was speaking to the great sage Narada, a celebrated devotee. Narada was asking Lord Siva about devotional service, and Siva, being the topmost Vaisnava, was instructing him No edit summary
- 13:0013:00, 5 May 2024 diff hist +32 Indeed, he (Lord Siva) is one of the mahajanas, the twelve authorities on Vaisnava philosophy (svayambhur naradah sambhuh kumarah kapilo manuh, etc.) - SB 6.3.20 No edit summary current
- 12:5712:57, 5 May 2024 diff hist +32 Even though Lord Siva appeared to preach Mayavada philosophy, at the end of his pastime in the form of Sankaracarya, he preached the Vaisnava philosophy No edit summary current
- 12:5412:54, 5 May 2024 diff hist +32 Brahmaji, Lord Siva, Srimati Laksmiji and the four Kumaras (Sanaka, Sanatana, etc.) are leaders of the four desireless Vaisnava sampradayas No edit summary current
- 12:4912:49, 5 May 2024 diff hist +32 At one of the programs, somebody raised the question that we cited that Lord Siva is worshiping Krsna, that he is a Vaisnava. So that person replied that Lord Rama also worshiped Siva. So he wanted to know the explanation No edit summary current
- 12:3212:32, 5 May 2024 diff hist −17 Fight on the principle of religion. That is real fight. Otherwise fight whimsically, that is animals' fight, cats' and dogs' fight No edit summary current
- 12:3112:31, 5 May 2024 diff hist −17 Our fight is for this purpose, no more death. This is real fight. Your, what is your fight? You may save yourself for two years or three years or ten years, but you have to die. You have no such program not to die. But here is a program, no more death No edit summary current
- 12:2912:29, 5 May 2024 diff hist −17 The real fighting is now. Krsna will give you all protection. So, chant Hare Krsna and fight. One movie expert has opined there are so many ideas in our movement. Try to get our ideas into movies No edit summary current
- 12:2712:27, 5 May 2024 diff hist −17 The brainwash books are already there. Even if they stop externally, internally it will go on. Our first class campaign is book distribution. Go house to house. The real fighting is now. Krsna will give you all protection No edit summary current
4 May 2024
- 12:2412:24, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Vedas; smrti, the Puranas and other literatures, dharma-sastra, smrti-sastra and Purana, pancarati-vidhi - without reference to all these authentic literature, any kind of devotional activities are not accepted by the Gosvamis No edit summary current
- 12:2312:23, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Category:Not Accepted By Devotees of God No edit summary current
- 12:2112:21, 4 May 2024 diff hist +1 One can have any of these five forms of liberation (sayujya-mukti, sarupya-mukti, salokya-mukti, sarsti-mukti and samipya-mukti), but of the five the sayujya-mukti, merging with the impersonal aspect, is not accepted by Vaisnava devotees No edit summary current
- 12:1512:15, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Sruti, the Vedas, smrti, the Puranas and other literatures, dharma-sastra, smrti-sastra and Purana, pancarati-vidhi - without reference to all these authentic literature, any kind of devotional activities are not accepted by the Gosvamis No edit summary current
- 12:1412:14, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Some scholars argue that simply by following the principles of varna and asrama one can gradually rise up to the perfections reached by practicing devotional service, but this argument is not accepted by the great authorities No edit summary current
- 12:1112:11, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Usually the features shown in the material world have no existence in the Vaikuntha planets, and thus they are not accepted by the pure devotees No edit summary current
- 12:0612:06, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 One can have any of these five forms of liberation (sayujya-mukti, sarupya-mukti, salokya-mukti, sarsti-mukti and samipya-mukti), but of the five the sayujya-mukti, merging with the impersonal aspect, is not accepted by Vaisnava devotees No edit summary
- 12:0212:02, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 The words or songs of a person not fixed in Vaisnava behavior, not strictly following the rules and regulations and chanting the Hare Krsna mantra should not be accepted by pure devotees No edit summary current
- 11:5111:51, 4 May 2024 diff hist −44 An ordinary man not supported by authorized statements of the sastras and acaryas should not be accepted as an incarnation or devotee No edit summary current
- 11:5011:50, 4 May 2024 diff hist −44 An occupational duty of the brahmana is to teach Vedic knowledge, but unless there is an emergency, this professional duty should not be accepted by the ksatriyas, vaisyas or sudras No edit summary current
- 11:4911:49, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Herein (SB 7.11.35) it is clearly stated by Narada Muni that one should not be accepted as a brahmana, ksatriya, vaisya or sudra according to birth, for although this is going on now, it is not accepted by the sastras No edit summary current
- 11:3711:37, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Blind men may lead many other blind followers without true knowledge of material conditions, but they are not accepted by devotees like Prahlada Maharaja No edit summary current
- 11:3511:35, 4 May 2024 diff hist −44 A Krsna conscious person should not be disturbed whether his preaching work is being accepted by the people or not No edit summary current
- 11:3411:34, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 A Krsna conscious person should not be disturbed whether his preaching work is being accepted by the people or not No edit summary
- 11:2811:28, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 As such, the argument of the Mayavadi philosophers that this world is false is not accepted by the Vaisnava philosophers No edit summary current
- 11:2711:27, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 An ordinary man not supported by authorized statements of the sastras and acaryas should not be accepted as an incarnation or devotee No edit summary
- 11:2611:26, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 An occupational duty of the brahmana is to teach Vedic knowledge, but unless there is an emergency, this professional duty should not be accepted by the ksatriyas, vaisyas or sudras No edit summary
- 11:2311:23, 4 May 2024 diff hist +46 Anything not given by the Supreme Personality of Godhead is not accepted by the Bhagavat school as religion. In the beginning of SB it is said, Dharmah projita kaitavo. This kaitavo religion means cheating religion No edit summary current
- 11:1711:17, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Although brahmajyoti is not different from His (the Supreme Person) personal body, that sort of oneness (merging into the bodily luster of the Personality of Godhead) is not accepted by a pure devotee No edit summary current
- 11:1411:14, 4 May 2024 diff hist +33 The modern theory that starvation is due to an increase in population is not accepted by the demigods or the devotees of the Lord No edit summary current
- 11:1311:13, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 The modern theory that starvation is due to an increase in population is not accepted by the demigods or the devotees of the Lord No edit summary
- 11:1111:11, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 In this conception (of pancopasana) the impersonalists imagine one of these five deities (Visnu, Siva etc.) as supreme and reject the others. Such philosophical speculation, which is certainly idol worship, is not accepted by Sri Caitanya or by Vaisnavas No edit summary current
- 10:5110:51, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 Category:Real Fight No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 10:4610:46, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 The real fighting is now. Krsna will give you all protection. So, chant Hare Krsna and fight. One movie expert has opined there are so many ideas in our movement. Try to get our ideas into movies No edit summary
- 10:4310:43, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 The brainwash books are already there. Even if they stop externally, internally it will go on. Our first class campaign is book distribution. Go house to house. The real fighting is now. Krsna will give you all protection No edit summary
- 10:3910:39, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 Real religious fighting No edit summary current
- 10:3410:34, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 Our fight is for this purpose, no more death. This is real fight. Your, what is your fight? You may save yourself for two years or three years or ten years, but you have to die. You have no such program not to die. But here is a program, no more death No edit summary
- 10:3010:30, 4 May 2024 diff hist +25 Fight on the principle of religion. That is real fight. Otherwise fight whimsically, that is animals' fight, cats' and dogs' fight No edit summary
- 10:2810:28, 4 May 2024 diff hist 0 A ksatriya is profited, either dead or alive. That will be explained. Because in a fighting, I mean to say, real religious fighting, on principle it is a ksatriya is not responsible for killing No edit summary current
- 10:2710:27, 4 May 2024 diff hist +1 A ksatriya is profited, either dead or alive. That will be explained. Because in a fighting, I mean to say, real religious fighting, on principle it is a ksatriya is not responsible for killing No edit summary
- 10:2610:26, 4 May 2024 diff hist +23 A ksatriya is profited, either dead or alive. That will be explained. Because in a fighting, I mean to say, real religious fighting, on principle it is a ksatriya is not responsible for killing No edit summary
- 10:2210:22, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 Arjuna was Krsna's friend, but He never said that "You stop your working." Rather, He engaged him in his real work. He was a fighter No edit summary current
- 10:2010:20, 4 May 2024 diff hist 0 Arjuna, while fighting on the Battlefield of Kuruksetra, was not really fighting at all; he was simply carrying out the orders of Krsna in full Krsna consciousness. Such a person is never entangled in the reactions of work. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:1610:16, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 Arjuna, while fighting on the Battlefield of Kuruksetra, was not really fighting at all; he was simply carrying out the orders of Krsna in full Krsna consciousness. Such a person is never entangled in the reactions of work. BG 1972 purports No edit summary
1 May 2024
- 11:0611:06, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 Yamunakarsana-lila is the pastime of attracting the Yamuna. One day, Sri Baladeva wanted the Yamuna River to come before Him, and when the river Yamuna refused, He took His plow, wanting to dig a canal so that the Yamuna would be obliged to come there No edit summary current
- 11:0211:02, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 These calves were grown up, but still the mothers wanted to feed them. Therefore Balarama was a little surprised, and He wanted to inquire from Krsna about the reason for their behavior No edit summary current
- 11:0111:01, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 Sri Baladeva was very angry at Arjuna (for kidnapping Subhadra), and He wanted to kill him, but Lord Krsna implored His brother to excuse Arjuna No edit summary current