|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <div id="compilation"> | | <div id="compilation"> |
| <div id="facts"> | | <div id="facts"> |
| {{terms|"So Vedic culture is very old. It is not a concocted thing or a new pattern. It is eternal. Therefore it is called sanatana"}} | | {{terms|"So Vedic culture is very old, it is not a concocted thing or a new pattern. It is eternal; therefore it is called ''sanātana''"}} |
| {{notes|}} | | {{notes|}} |
| {{compiler|Rishab}} | | {{compiler|Rishab}} |
| {{complete|ALL}} | | {{complete|ALL}} |
| {{first|22Sep11}} | | {{first|22Sep11}} |
| {{last|22Sep11}} | | {{last|23Sep11}} |
| {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} | | {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} |
| {{total|1}} | | {{total|1}} |
| {{toc right}} | | {{toc right}} |
| | [[Category:Vedic Culture]] |
| | [[Category:very]] |
| | [[Category:Old]] |
| | [[Category:It Is Not]] |
| | [[Category:Concoction]] |
| | [[Category:thing]] |
| | [[Category:New]] |
| | [[Category:Pattern]] |
| | [[Category:Eternal]] |
| | [[Category:therefore]] |
| | [[Category:It Is Called...]] |
| | [[Category:Sanatana]] |
| | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1966 - 1977]] |
| | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1971]] |
| | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, Srimad-Bhagavatam]] |
| | [[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - in Europe, England - London]] |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2> | | <div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2> |
| Line 18: |
Line 34: |
| <div class="heading">So Vedic culture is very old. It is not a concocted thing or a new pattern. It is eternal. Therefore it is called sanātana. Sanātana means eternal. It has no beginning, no end. | | <div class="heading">So Vedic culture is very old. It is not a concocted thing or a new pattern. It is eternal. Therefore it is called sanātana. Sanātana means eternal. It has no beginning, no end. |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 1.1.4 -- London, August 22, 1971|Lecture on SB 1.1.4 -- London, August 22, 1971]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: So the Vedic literatures, one cannot say that it is concocted. One reference is there, one reference in another place. Sometimes there are some rascal philosophers, they say that Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam has been compiled for, I mean to say, eulogizing Kṛṣṇa, who was the son of a leader, (indistinct) like that. So many they manufacture. But you cannot do so, because the reference is there. Very old Purāṇas. Some rascal philosopher says Bhāgavata Purāṇa was compiled recently. How there is a reference within the Purāṇas? So this rascaldom has spoiled the whole Vedic culture. The so-called Westernized scholars... Because the real purpose was that the rulers(?), they did not want to present Indian culture as very old, because then their Darwin's theory will be spoiled. That was their nonsense proposition, that they are proposing that human brain is being developed. But if they accept that millions of years ago the brain was already there, then their rascals theory of Darwin will be spoiled.</p> | | |
| <p>So actual fact is this, that this verse Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, was compiled five thousand years ago. Not that Vyāsadeva manufactured something. All Vedic literatures were existing. Vyāsadeva only... Just like I am presenting. I am presenting the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement. It is not it is manufactured by me, it is concocted by me, that I have introduced... Just like so many things are there—this samāja, that samāja, this samāja. We are not like that. As Kṛṣṇa is old, so this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is also old. It is as old as Kṛṣṇa. And Kṛṣṇa says that "Forty millions of years ago I spoke this Bhagavad-gītā to sun-god." So where is the history? Where your history stands? Your history cannot give chronological table more than three thousand years.</p>
| | |
| <p>So Vedic culture is very old. It is not a concocted thing or a new pattern. It is eternal. Therefore it is called sanātana. Sanātana means eternal. It has no beginning, no end. Sanātana. So Vedic culture means sanātana, eternal. Kṛṣṇa is eternal. We living entities, we are eternal. And our relationship and exchange of loving service with Kṛṣṇa is also eternal. Kṛṣṇa is eternal, we are eternal, and our dealings with Kṛṣṇa is also eternal. But sometimes it becomes interrupted by the māyā, which is called svapna. Svapna means dreamlike. As dream has no fact, it is all hallucination, similarly our detachment from Kṛṣṇa is also a hallucination. Actually, there is no detachment. And when we are covered by this hallucination... Just like in dream we cry, "Oh, here is a tiger! Here is a tiger!" Tiger. Where is tiger? Similarly, this forgetfulness of Kṛṣṇa is like that. So if we simply follow the rules and regulations given by the great ācāryas, then immediately we can revive our Kṛṣṇa consciousness. It doesn't take even second. The method...(?) Just like you are dreaming, crying, "There is tiger, tiger." And if somebody pushes you, "Why you are doing that?" And if you immediately become awake "Oh! All tiger finished." (laughter) "All tiger finished." So one has to give the push that "There is no tiger." Then immediately the whole hallucination will go.</p>
| | <mp3player>https://vanipedia.s3.amazonaws.com/clip/720714SB-LONDON_clip003.mp3</mp3player> |
| </div>
| | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 1.1.4 -- London, August 22, 1971|Lecture on SB 1.1.4 -- London, August 22, 1971]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;"> |
| </div>
| | Prabhupāda: So the Vedic literatures, one cannot say that it is concocted—one reference is there, one reference is another ''Purāṇa''. Sometimes there are some rascal philosophers, they say that ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' has been compiled by . . . for, I mean to say, eulogizing Kṛṣṇa, who was the son of a leader. Like that. But you cannot do that, because the reference is there, very old ''Purāṇas''. Some rascal philosopher says ''Bhāgavata'' was compiled recently. So how it is the reference should be in the ''Purāṇas''? |
| </div>
| | |
| | So this rascaldom has spoiled the whole Vedic culture, the so-called westernized scholars, because the real purpose was that the rulers, they did not want to present Indian culture as very old, because then their Darwin's theory will be spoiled. That was their nonsense proposition, that they are proposing that human brain is being developed, but if they accept that millions of years ago the brain was already there, then their rascal theory of Darwin will be spoiled. |
| | |
| | So actual fact is this, that this verse . . . ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' was compiled five thousand years ago. Not that Vyāsadeva manufactured something. All Vedic literature were existing. Vyāsadeva only . . . just like I am presenting. I am presenting the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement. It is not it is manufactured by me, it is concocted by me, that I have introduced. Just like so many things are there, these ''samāj'', that ''samāj'', this ''samāj''. |
| | |
| | We are not like that. As Kṛṣṇa is old, so this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is also old. It is as old as Kṛṣṇa, and Kṛṣṇa says that, "Forty millions of years ago I spoke this ''Bhagavad-gītā'' to sun god." So where is the history? Where does your history stand? Your history cannot give chronological table more than three thousand years. |
| | |
| | So Vedic culture is very old, it is not a concocted thing or a new pattern. It is eternal; therefore it is called ''sanātana''. ''Sanātana'' means eternal. It has no beginning, no end. ''Sanātana''. So Vedic culture means ''sanātana'', eternal. Kṛṣṇa is eternal; we living entities, we are eternal; and our relationship and exchange of loving service with Kṛṣṇa is also eternal. |
| | |
| | Kṛṣṇa is eternal, we are eternal, and our dealings with Kṛṣṇa is also eternal, but sometimes it becomes interrupted by this ''māyā'', which is called ''svapna''. ''Svapna'' means dream life. As dream has no fact—it is all hallucination—similarly, our detachment from Kṛṣṇa is also an hallucination. Actually there is no detachment. And when we are covered by this hallucination, just like in dream we cry, "Oh, here is a tiger! Here is a tiger!" "Tiger? Where is tiger?" Similarly, this forgetfulness of Kṛṣṇa is like that. |
| | |
| | So if we simply follow the rules and regulation given by the great ''ācāryas'', then immediately we can revive our Kṛṣṇa consciousness. It doesn't take even a second. The method, just like you are dreaming, crying, "There is tiger! Tiger!" And if somebody pushes you, "Why are you doing that?" and if you immediately become aware: "Where . . ." all tiger, finished. All tiger, finished. So one has to give this push that there is no tiger, then immediately the whole hallucination is gone. |
