One should not wrongly conclude that the Lord was formerly unmanifested and has now manifested Himself in the human form: Difference between revisions
(Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"one should not wrongly conclude that the Lord was formerly unmanifested and has now manifested Himself in the human form"}} {{not…') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{toc right}} | {{toc right}} | ||
[[Category:One Should Not]] | [[Category:One Should Not]] | ||
[[Category:Wrongly]] | [[Category:Wrongly Conclude]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Concluding about God]] | ||
[[Category:Was Formerly]] | [[Category:Was Formerly]] | ||
[[Category:Unmanifested]] | [[Category:Unmanifested]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:God's Manifesting]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:God in Human Form]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 02 Chapter 05 Purports - The Cause of All Causes]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 02 Purports]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2> | <div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2> | ||
Latest revision as of 11:43, 12 March 2022
Expressions researched:
"one should not wrongly conclude that the Lord was formerly unmanifested and has now manifested Himself in the human form"
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 2
O Brāhmaṇa Nārada, the Superseer, the transcendent Lord, is beyond the perception of the material senses of the living entities because of the above-mentioned three modes of nature. But He is the controller of everyone, including me.
In the Bhagavad-gītā (7.24-25) the Lord has declared very clearly that the impersonalist, who gives more importance to the transcendental rays of the Lord as brahma-jyotir and who concludes that the Absolute Truth is ultimately impersonal and only manifests a form at a time of necessity, is less intelligent than the personalist, however much the impersonalist may be engaged in studying the Vedānta. The fact is that such impersonalists are covered by the above-mentioned three modes of material nature; therefore, they are unable to approach the transcendental Personality of the Lord. The Lord is not approachable by everyone because He is curtained by His yogamāyā potency. But one should not wrongly conclude that the Lord was formerly unmanifested and has now manifested Himself in the human form. This misconception of the formlessness of the Supreme Personality of Godhead is due to the yogamāyā curtain of the Lord and can be removed only by the Supreme Will, as soon as the conditioned soul surrenders unto Him. The devotees of the Lord who are transcendental to the above-mentioned three modes of material nature can see the all-blissful transcendental form of the Lord with their vision of love in the attitude of pure devotional service.