No training (Lectures)

Expressions researched:
"No other training" |"no Vedic training" |"no devotional training" |"no need of training" |"no one is trained" |"no proper training" |"no regular training" |"no separate training" |"no spiritual training" |"no such training" |"no training" |"not be trained" |"not been trained" |"not being trained" |"not fully trained" |"not give them training" |"not give them training" |"not given training" |"not instructed or trained" |"not properly being trained" |"not properly trained" |"not require any training" |"not so trained" |"not such training" |"not take personal training" |"not taking training" |"not trained" |"not undergone the training" |"not very trained" |"not well trained" |"not yet trained" |"training is not" |"untrained"

Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures

Lecture on BG 1.31 -- London, July 24, 1973:

So the king's duty is, as representative of Kṛṣṇa, to make every citizen Kṛṣṇa conscious. Then he is doing nice duty. And because the monarchs did not do so, therefore now monarchy is abolished everywhere. So again the monarchs, where there is monarchy, little, at least show of monarchy, just like here in England there is, actually if the monarch becomes Kṛṣṇa conscious, actually becomes representative of Kṛṣṇa, then the whole face of the kingdom will change. That is required. Our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is for that purpose. We don't very much like this so-called democracy. What is the value of this democracy? All fools and rascals. They vote another fool and rascal, and he becomes prime minister, or this or that. Just like... In so many cases. That is not good for the people. We are not for this so-called democracy because they are not trained. If the king is trained... That was the system of monarchy. Just like Yudhiṣṭhira Mahārāja or Arjuna or anyone. All the kings. Rājarṣi.