|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{terms|"ordinary human being"|"ordinary human beings" }} | | <div id="compilation"> |
| | | <div id="facts"> |
| {{notes|}} | | {{terms|"ordinary human being"|"ordinary human beings"}} |
| | | {{notes|This page contains quotes relating to Krsna's not being an ordinary human being. It includes quotes relating to Krsna, His incarnations and His expansions, as applicable from the VedaBase query: "ordinary human being" or "ordinary human beings".}} |
| {{compiler|Visnu Murti}} | | {{compiler|Visnu Murti|Labangalatika|MadhuGopaldas}} |
| | |
| {{complete|ALL}} | | {{complete|ALL}} |
|
| |
| {{first|24Nov08}} | | {{first|24Nov08}} |
| | | {{last|05Apr10}} |
| {{last|24Nov08}} | |
| | |
| {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=4}} | | {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=4}} |
|
| |
| {{total|4}} | | {{total|4}} |
|
| |
| {{toc right}} | | {{toc right}} |
| | | [[Category:Krsna Is Not an Ordinary Human Being|1]] |
| [[Category:Krsna is Not an Ordinary Human Being|1]] | | [[Category:Compilations from Letters]] |
| | | </div> |
| [[Category:Letters]] | | <div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2> |
| | | </div> |
| == Correspondence == | | <div id="1970_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="5" parent="Correspondence" text="1970 Correspondence"><h3>1970 Correspondence</h3> |
| | | </div> |
| === 1970 Correspondence === | | <div id="LettertoEkayaniLosAngeles25July1970_0" class="quote" parent="1970_Correspondence" book="Let" index="447" link="Letter to Ekayani -- Los Angeles 25 July, 1970" link_text="Letter to Ekayani -- Los Angeles 25 July, 1970"> |
| | | <div class="heading">Because Krsna was playing as an ordinary human being, His activities here appear just like ordinary human activities, but in the Spiritual Sky there is no such requirement. |
| <span class="q_heading">'''Because Krsna was playing as an ordinary human being, His activities here appear just like ordinary human activities, but in the Spiritual Sky there is no such requirement.'''</span> | | </div> |
| | | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Ekayani -- Los Angeles 25 July, 1970|Letter to Ekayani -- Los Angeles 25 July, 1970]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions, the first answer is that it is correct that the body transcendental of Krsna and Krsna Himself are nondifferent. So what is the difficulty to understand that the soul of Aghasura merged into the body of Krsna? In other words Krsna benedicts the demons Whom He kills personally with the impersonal liberation of merging with Him.</p> |
| <span class="LET-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Ekayani -- Los Angeles 25 July, 1970|Letter to Ekayani -- Los Angeles 25 July, 1970]]:''' Regarding your questions, the first answer is that it is correct that the body transcendental of Krsna and Krsna Himself are nondifferent. So what is the difficulty to understand that the soul of Aghasura merged into the body of Krsna? In other words Krsna benedicts the demons Whom He kills personally with the impersonal liberation of merging with Him. | | <p>There is a difference between the activities of Krsna which are exhibited to the perception of the conditioned souls in this world and His activities in Goloka Vrndavana. Because Krsna was playing as an ordinary human being, His activities here appear just like ordinary human activities, but in the Spiritual Sky there is no such requirement. There in the spiritual sky Krsna has His activities also but they cannot be understood by the conditioned living entities how they are going on without any resemblance of the mechanical workings of things in this material world.</p> |
| There is a difference between the activities of Krsna which are exhibited to the perception of the conditioned souls in this world and His activities in Goloka Vrndavana. Because Krsna was playing as an ordinary human being, His activities here appear just like ordinary human activities, but in the Spiritual Sky there is no such requirement. There in the spiritual sky Krsna has His activities also but they cannot be understood by the conditioned living entities how they are going on without any resemblance of the mechanical workings of things in this material world.</span> | | </div> |
| | | </div> |
| === 1971 Correspondence === | | <div id="1971_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="6" parent="Correspondence" text="1971 Correspondence"><h3>1971 Correspondence</h3> |
| | | </div> |
| <span class="q_heading">'''"Krishna is not an ordinary human being; He is the Absolute Truth, His Body, Mind and He Himself are One and Absolute''. '''</span> | | <div id="LettertoSatsvarupaCalcutta9February1971_0" class="quote" parent="1971_Correspondence" book="Let" index="51" link="Letter to Satsvarupa -- Calcutta 9 February, 1971" link_text="Letter to Satsvarupa -- Calcutta 9 February, 1971"> |
| | | <div class="heading">"Krishna is not an ordinary human being; He is the Absolute Truth, His Body, Mind and He Himself are One and Absolute." |
| <span class="LET-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Satsvarupa -- Calcutta 9 February, 1971|Letter to Satsvarupa -- Calcutta 9 February, 1971]]:''' I hope that everything is going on well there with the production of Bhagavad-gita. In this regards please make the following addition to the text: | | </div> |
| Chapter IX, The Most Confidential Knowledge, in the purport of the 34th verse you will read "Krishna is not an ordinary human being; He is the Absolute Truth, His Body, Mind and He Himself are One and Absolute''. Immediately therefore you can add the following: In the Kurma Purana, as it is quoted by Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Goswami in his Anubhasya comments of Caitanya Caritamrta, 5th chapter Ādi lila, verses 41-48, "deha dehi bibhedo 'yang nesvare vidyate kvacit'' which means that there is no difference in Krishna, the Supreme Lord, between Himself and His body. | | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Satsvarupa -- Calcutta 9 February, 1971|Letter to Satsvarupa -- Calcutta 9 February, 1971]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I hope that everything is going on well there with the production of Bhagavad-gita. In this regards please make the following addition to the text:</p> |
| This evidence is given here to show that there is no distinction between Krishna's body and Himself since such commentators as Dr. Radhakrishnan make such distinction.</span> | | <p>Chapter IX, The Most Confidential Knowledge, in the purport of the 34th verse you will read "Krishna is not an ordinary human being; He is the Absolute Truth, His Body, Mind and He Himself are One and Absolute". Immediately therefore you can add the following: In the Kurma Purana, as it is quoted by Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Goswami in his Anubhasya comments of Caitanya Caritamrta, 5th chapter Ādi lila, verses 41-48, "deha dehi bibhedo 'yang nesvare vidyate kvacit" which means that there is no difference in Krishna, the Supreme Lord, between Himself and His body.</p> |
| | | <p>This evidence is given here to show that there is no distinction between Krishna's body and Himself since such commentators as Dr. Radhakrishnan make such distinction.</p> |
| === 1976 Correspondence === | | </div> |
| | | </div> |
| <span class="q_heading">'''Krishna is not an ordinary human being. How can you think that Krishna is contradicting Himself in His own statements? It is your concoction.'''</span> | | <div id="1976_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="11" parent="Correspondence" text="1976 Correspondence"><h3>1976 Correspondence</h3> |
| | | </div> |
| <span class="LET-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Sri K. Raghupati Rao -- Calcutta 13 January, 1976|Letter to Sri K. Raghupati Rao -- Calcutta 13 January, 1976]]:''' You say that there is some contradiction in the Bhagavad-gita, that is your defective understanding. The direct meaning of the 15th Chapter 7th verse is that every living entity is the eternal part and parcel of Krishna. How can you think of contradiction in the Bhagavad-gita? Krishna is not an ordinary human being. How can you think that Krishna is contradicting Himself in His own statements? It is your concoction. The jiva is jivatma and Krishna is paramatma. Where is the contradiction? Why do you manufacture "iva''? That is the defect of Mayavadi philosophy. They concoct ideas.</span> | | <div id="LettertoSriKRaghupatiRaoCalcutta13January1976_0" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="39" link="Letter to Sri K. Raghupati Rao -- Calcutta 13 January, 1976" link_text="Letter to Sri K. Raghupati Rao -- Calcutta 13 January, 1976"> |
| | | <div class="heading">Krishna is not an ordinary human being. How can you think that Krishna is contradicting Himself in His own statements? It is your concoction. |
| <span class="q_heading">'''In no Vedic Literature is it said that Krishna is an ordinary human being.'''</span> | | </div> |
| | | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sri K. Raghupati Rao -- Calcutta 13 January, 1976|Letter to Sri K. Raghupati Rao -- Calcutta 13 January, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">You say that there is some contradiction in the Bhagavad-gita, that is your defective understanding. The direct meaning of the 15th Chapter 7th verse is that every living entity is the eternal part and parcel of Krishna. How can you think of contradiction in the Bhagavad-gita? Krishna is not an ordinary human being. How can you think that Krishna is contradicting Himself in His own statements? It is your concoction. The jiva is jivatma and Krishna is paramatma. Where is the contradiction? Why do you manufacture "iva"? That is the defect of Mayavadi philosophy. They concoct ideas.</p> |
| <span class="LET-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Dr. Chittaranjan Mohapatra -- Mayapur 21 March, 1976|Letter to Dr. Chittaranjan Mohapatra -- Mayapur 21 March, 1976]]:''' One should not think that Krishna is an ordinary man. If you think like that then you do not know anything about Krishna. Avajananti man mudha manusim tanum asritah . . . [Bg. 9.11]. "Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My transcendental nature and My supreme dominion over all that be.'' All the mudhas or rascals consider Krishna to be an ordinary man, but He is not ordinary, He is the Supreme Being. Where do you get this information that Krishna is an ordinary man like us? In no Vedic Literature is it said that Krishna is an ordinary human being. In the Brahma-Samhita it is said: Isvara Parama Krishna . . . He is described as the Supreme Being. I do not know on what authority you can say that Krishna is an ordinary human being like you or me?</span> | | </div> |
| | </div> |
| | <div id="LettertoDrChittaranjanMohapatraMayapur21March1976_1" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="197" link="Letter to Dr. Chittaranjan Mohapatra -- Mayapur 21 March, 1976" link_text="Letter to Dr. Chittaranjan Mohapatra -- Mayapur 21 March, 1976"> |
| | <div class="heading">In no Vedic Literature is it said that Krishna is an ordinary human being. |
| | </div> |
| | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Dr. Chittaranjan Mohapatra -- Mayapur 21 March, 1976|Letter to Dr. Chittaranjan Mohapatra -- Mayapur 21 March, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">One should not think that Krishna is an ordinary man. If you think like that then you do not know anything about Krishna. Avajananti man mudha manusim tanum asritah . . . ([[Vanisource:BG 9.11 (1972)|BG 9.11]]). "Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My transcendental nature and My supreme dominion over all that be." All the mudhas or rascals consider Krishna to be an ordinary man, but He is not ordinary, He is the Supreme Being. Where do you get this information that Krishna is an ordinary man like us? In no Vedic Literature is it said that Krishna is an ordinary human being. In the Brahma-Samhita it is said: Isvara Parama Krishna . . . He is described as the Supreme Being. I do not know on what authority you can say that Krishna is an ordinary human being like you or me?</p> |
| | </div> |
| | </div> |
| | </div> |
