Imperfect senses (Lectures, Other)

Expressions researched:
"imperfect experience of the senses" |"imperfect in his senses" |"imperfect material senses" |"imperfect of senses" |"imperfect sense" |"imperfect senses" |"imperfect, illusioned, and cheating senses" |"sense - they are all imperfect" |"sense are not the perfect" |"sense impressions, imperfect" |"sense is always imperfect" |"sense perception are all imperfect" |"sense perception for their imperfect knowledge" |"sense perception, that is imperfect" |"sense, it is imperfect" |"sense, they are imperfect" |"senses are admittedly imperfect" |"senses are all imperfect" |"senses are also imperfect" |"senses are blunt, imperfect" |"senses are faulty, imperfect" |"senses are imperfect" |"senses are neither imperfect" |"senses are not imperfect" |"senses are not perfect" |"senses are so imperfect" |"senses are so imperfect" |"senses are so limited, imperfect" |"senses are very blunt, imperfect" |"senses are very imperfect" |"senses is always imperfect" |"senses must be imperfect" |"senses you will find imperfect" |"senses, all are imperfect" |"senses, you become imperfect" |"senses? They are all imperfect"

Notes from the compiler: VedaBase query: "imperfect sense*"

Nectar of Devotion Lectures

The Nectar of Devotion -- Vrndavana, October 17, 1972:

It is not a question of any personal religion or personal ambition or something manufactured by some imperfect sense enjoyer. It is authorized because Bhagavad-gītā is authorized. Bhagavad-gītā is accepted... First of all, He was, it was accepted by Arjuna in toto. Sarvam etad ṛtaṁ manye yad vadasi keśava (BG 10.14). "My dear Kṛṣṇa, whatever You are saying, I accept it in toto, without any interpretation, without any rejection." Somebody says, somebody may say, "Arjuna was Kṛṣṇa's friend. To praise Him, he might have said like that." No. Arjuna immediately gives evidence that "It is not that I am accepting but you are accepted as, as such by such great personalities as, like Vyāsadeva, Nārada, Asita." He gives authority. So that was five thousand years ago. Later on, all the ācāryas, Rāmānujācārya, Madhvācārya, Viṣṇu Svāmī, Nimbārka, even Śaṅkarācārya. We Vaiṣṇava ācāryas, they differ little with Śaṅkarācārya. Impersonalist and personalist. But Śaṅkarācārya even, even though he was impersonalist, he accepted Kṛṣṇa in his commentary on Bhagavad-gītā. Sai bhagavān svayaṁ kṛṣṇa. So Kṛṣṇa is accepted as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. There is no doubt about it. By all authorities. And Kṛṣṇa Himself says in the Bhagavad-gītā, mattaḥ parataraṁ nānyat (BG 7.7). "There is no more superior authority than Me."