Dr. Radhakrishnan: Difference between revisions
(Created page with 'Radhakrishnan Category:Contemporary Personalities Mentioned by Srila Prabhupada') |
m (Pywikibot v.2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Radhakrishnan | Radhakrishnan|Radhakrishnan's|Radhakrishnans | ||
[[Category:Contemporary Personalities Mentioned by Srila Prabhupada]] | *"Dr. Radhakrishnan"; "Dr. S. Radhakrishnan"; "Dr. Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan, who is a spiritualist of sorts and an erudite scholar"; "Śrī Radhakrishnan (former president of India)" | ||
[[Category:Mayavadis]] | |||
[[Category:Personalities from Academia]] | |||
[[Category:Names of Contemporary Personalities Mentioned by Srila Prabhupada]] | |||
[[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | |||
Latest revision as of 02:44, 25 June 2017
Radhakrishnan|Radhakrishnan's|Radhakrishnans
- "Dr. Radhakrishnan"; "Dr. S. Radhakrishnan"; "Dr. Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan, who is a spiritualist of sorts and an erudite scholar"; "Śrī Radhakrishnan (former president of India)"
Pages in category "Dr. Radhakrishnan"
The following 33 pages are in this category, out of 33 total.
1
A
- According to Dr. Radhakrishnan, since there is a difference between Krsna's body and His soul, we must surrender to Krsna's soul and not His body
- After writing this and thus accepting the real purport of the Gita, how can Dr. Radhakrishnan later state that Lord Krsna's body and soul are different? Such an idea must be a result of his materialistic education
- Aurobindo or Dr. Radhakrishnan, they have written Bhagavad-gita, annotation, so many others also, but Krsna is missing. They're faulty. Krsna is missing. Through Bhagavad-gita, they want to make the society Krsna-less
D
- Dr. Radhakrishnan interprets: It is not the personal Krsna to whom we have to give ourselves up utterly but the Unborn, Beginningless, Eternal who speaks through Krsna
- Dr. Radhakrishnan's misinterpretation of Text 34 of Chapter 9 of Bhagavad-gita
- Dr. Radhakrishnan's writing lacked spiritual insight: in many places he had mishandled and misinterpreted the text, and thus he had made his book unacceptable to spiritualists in the line of pure devotion
I
- I've (Prabhupada) written state letter to Dr. Radhakrishnan. "So if you want to, I mean to say, compensate the greatest sin you have committed in your Bhagavad-gita, then you join this Krsna conscious movement and rectify yourself."
- If Dr. Radhakrishnan really accepts Lord Krsna as the absolute God, then what inspired him to see another being within Krsna and to write, "It is not the personal Krsna to whom we have to give ourselves up
- In general, the monists cannot grasp the intricate philosophy of nondualism. So Dr. Radhakrishnan has spun out of his imagination a theory by which he tries to establish dualism in nondualism
- It is quite understandable that an ordinary mortal like Dr. Radhakrishnan is illusioned about Lord Krsna, since even the residents of the heavenly planets are illusioned about Him
S
- Since Dr. Radhakrishnan implies that the impersonal Brahman alone possesses such transcendental qualities as being inexhaustible, imperishable, and unborn, we must turn to the Gita for a proper reply
- So Dr. Radhakrishnan was a big rascal
- So if it is the deluded who despise Lord Krsna, then is it not time for Dr. Radhakrishnan himself to admit that he is guilty of this crime? Let him realize how he has abused the "Lord of all existences," equating Him with a mere mortal
T
- The Bhagavad-gita is the standard book of knowledge in India and many eminent persons like Gandhi, Aurobindo, Dr. RadhaKrishnan, etc. they tried to understand the Bhagavad-gita, but could not do it
- The brahmacari read the book and came to us a little dissatisfied, though the book itself was deeply esoteric. The reason for his dissatisfaction was that Dr. Radhakrishnan's writing lacked spiritual insight
- The goddess of learning, Sarasvati, inspired Dr. Radhakrishnan to say "Man cannot become God." We would like to clarify this statement by saying "Even after becoming liberated, a man cannot become God
- The jnanis they are also second-class rascal. Even a big scholar like Dr. Radhakrishnan, he is how, I mean to say, deforming the meaning of Bhagavad-gita
- The scriptural conclusion is that mundane philosophers like Dr. Radhakrishnan are not qualified to delve into spiritual subjects. The devotees of the Lord alone are eligible to understand Lord Krsna
- The truth is that only those who have been blessed by the Lord can fathom the spiritual science dealing with God. Dr. Radhakrishnan's book irrefutably proves this
- They are following blindly, nonsense, the Radhakrishnan and company. Therefore our Dr. Svarupa Damodara has said: "Krsna, the greatest scientist." We are following the greatest scientist. They are rascals
W
- We have not the slightest intention of confronting a world-famous philosopher like Dr. Radhakrishnan with arguments, yet on the brahmacari's repeated request we have to scrutinize the text and point out the discrepancies
- We would like to quote the substance of a speech delivered by Sri Radhakrishnan at a recent meeting of UNESCO in Paris. He said that when a nation proudly turns away from God and concentrates on worldly success and prosperity, it meets its doom
- Who cares for Radhakrishnan? There are so many atheists came and gone; things are going on as it is. This is culture