Diacritic Marks: Difference between revisions
Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) (Created page with '"Diacritic spelling"|"diacritic mark"|"diacritic markings"|"diacritic marks"|"diacritic signs"|"diacritic transliteration"|"diacritical markings"|"diacritical marks"|"mark Diacri…') |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 09:49, 26 July 2010
"Diacritic spelling"|"diacritic mark"|"diacritic markings"|"diacritic marks"|"diacritic signs"|"diacritic transliteration"|"diacritical markings"|"diacritical marks"|"mark Diacritic"
Pages in category "Diacritic Marks"
The following 13 pages are in this category, out of 13 total.
I
- I am expecting this printing of our literature, especially Srimad-Bhagavatam, with devanagari type and diacritic transliteration will be completely entrusted to you
- I want that in all of our books, magazines and other writings the scholarly presentation be given in all instances, so for every Sanskrit word there must be the appropriate spelling and diacritic marks
- If we publish our Srimad-Bhagavatam exactly in the way I have already begun it, it will be a unique contribution. The scholars only require diacritic marks
- In reply to Jayadvaita's questions, henceforward the policy for using diacritic markings is that I want them used everywhere, on large books, small books and also BTG
W
- We are publishing all our books in a scholarly way so that professors, teachers, philosophers, they . . . they can read it. And it is very easily done. Word-to-word, Sanskrit word, English, and diacritic marks. So we are working very hard
- We should not have to reduce our standard on account of the ignorant masses. Diacritic spelling is accepted internationally, and no learned person will even care to read our books unless this system is maintained