Caitanya Was Not: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Category:Caitanya Category:Was Not Category:Caitanya Mahaprabhu - Umbrella Category category:No's and Not's - Umbrella Category Category:Was and Were - Umbre...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Category:Was Not]] | [[Category:Was Not]] | ||
[[Category:Caitanya Mahaprabhu - Umbrella Category]] | [[Category:Caitanya Mahaprabhu - Umbrella Category]] | ||
[[Category:Was and Were - Umbrella Category]] | [[Category:Was and Were - Umbrella Category]] | ||
[[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:46, 15 June 2020
Pages in category "Caitanya Was Not"
The following 18 pages are in this category, out of 18 total.
A
- Actually He (Lord Caitanya) was not at all displeased with Gadadhara Pandita. Indeed, because Gadadhara Pandita is the personal potency of Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu, there is no chance of the Lord’s being dissatisfied with him
- All the devotees were very anxious when they saw that the Lord was not in His room. They wandered about searching for Him with a warning lamp
- All these criticisms were carried to Lord Caitanya when He was at Benares, and He was not at all surprised at them (the Mayavadi philosophers). He even smiled when the news was carried to Him
- Although He (Lord Caitanya) was a brahmana and was not rich, He took sannyasa, the renounced order of life, and thus extricated Himself from family entanglement - CC Intro
H
- He (Caitanya Mahaprabhu) said that although He was certainly not advanced in a literary career, He had heard from others how to criticize such poetry, and as a sruti-dhara, possessing a complete memory, He could understand the process for such a review
- He (Caitanya) was not a farcical Narayana like the daridra-narayanas invented by so-called sannyasis
- Hearing Lord Caitanya speak in that way (about Mukuda Datta's activities), Mukunda Datta, standing outside, was exceedingly glad that the Lord would at some time be pleased with him, although He was not pleased at that moment
T
- The brahmana Jagannatha Misra saw in his dream told him that his son (Lord Caitanya) was not an ordinary human being. If He were a transcendental person, He would have self-effulgent knowledge, and thus there would be no need to educate Him
- The controversy on this subject (chanting the names of the gopis or Krsna's name) reached a point that after this incident Caitanya Mahaprabhu decided to take sannyasa because He was not taken very seriously in His grhastha-asrama
- The essence of the sastra should be presented to the fools and rascals so that, just like Caitanya Mahaprabhu, He presented Himself before His guru. Caitanya Mahaprabhu was not a rascal, but He presented Himself as a rascal because we are rascals
W
- When Mayavadi sannyasis in Benares saw that Lord Caitanya was indulging in singing, dancing, playing musical instruments and always chanting Hare Krsna, they concluded that He was not educated and that, out of sentiment, He was misleading His followers
- When Raghupati Upadhyaya saw Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu's ecstatic symptoms, he decided that the Lord was not a human being but Krsna Himself